Texture Feature Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastases Based on Tumor and Tumor-brain Interface

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Yini [1 ]
Lin, Hongsen [1 ]
Sun, Jiayi [1 ,2 ]
Pu, Renwang [1 ]
Zhou, Yujing [1 ]
Sun, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Med Univ, Coll Med Imaging, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Glioblastoma; Radiomics; Machine learning; Tumor-to-brain interface region; Metastasis; MRI FEATURES; INVASION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.025
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: Texture features, derived from both the entire tumor area and the region of the tumor-to-brain interface, are crucial indicators for distinguishing tumor types and their degrees of malignancy. However, the discriminative value of texture features from both regions for identifying glioblastomas and metastatic tumors has not been thoroughly explored. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a diagnostic model that combines texture features from the entire tumor area and a 10 mm tumor-to-brain interface region, in an attempt to identify more stable and effective texture features. Method: We retrospectively collected enhanced T1-weighted imaging data from 97 patients with glioblastoma (GBM) and 90 patients with single brain metastasis (SBM) between 2010 and 2024. Machine learning is used to establish multiple diagnostic models for discriminating GBM and SBM based on texture features of the entire tumor and 10 mm tumor-to-brain interface regions. Results underwent evaluation through 5-fold cross-validation analysis, calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each model. The performance of each model was compared using the Delong test, and the interpretability of the optimized model was further augmented by employing Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: The AUCs for all pipelines in the validation dataset were compared using FeAture Explorer (FAE) software. Among the models established by Kruskal-Wallis(KW) and Logistic Regression(LR), the AUC was highest using the "one-standard error" rule. '10mm_glrlm_GrayLevelNonUniformity' was considered the most stable and predictive feature. The best models in the training set, test set, and validation set were not the same. In the test set, the KW1LR model had the highest AUC of 0.880 and an accuracy of 0.824. Conclusion: The texture feature model that combines the overall tumor and the tumor-brain interface is beneficial for distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary metastatic tumors, and the texture features of the tumor interface exhibit higher heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 410
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Differentiation between brain metastases and glioblastoma multiforme based on MRI, MRS and MRSI
    Luts, Jan
    Suykens, Johan A. K.
    Van Huffel, Sabine
    Laudadio, Teresa
    Van Cauter, Sofie
    Himmelreich, Uwe
    Molla, Enrique
    Piquer, Jose
    Martinez-Bisbal, M. Carmen
    Celda, Bernardo
    2009 22ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2009, : 146 - +
  • [32] Principal Risk of Peritumoral Edema After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Meningioma Is Tumor-Brain Contact Interface Area
    Cai, Rongsheng
    Barnett, Gene H.
    Novak, Eric
    Chao, Samuel T.
    Suh, John H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 66 (03) : 513 - 522
  • [33] Average Threshold Based Fractal Texture Feature Extraction on Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Brain Tumor Images
    Anithadevi, D.
    Perumal, K.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART TECHNOLOGIES AND MANAGEMENT FOR COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROLS, ENERGY AND MATERIALS (ICSTM), 2017, : 216 - 220
  • [34] Tumor microenvironment differences between primary tumor and brain metastases
    Bernardo Cacho-Díaz
    Donovan R. García-Botello
    Talia Wegman-Ostrosky
    Gervith Reyes-Soto
    Elizabeth Ortiz-Sánchez
    Luis Alonso Herrera-Montalvo
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 18
  • [35] Tumor microenvironment differences between primary tumor and brain metastases
    Cacho-Diaz, Bernardo
    Garcia-Botello, Donovan R.
    Wegman-Ostrosky, Talia
    Reyes-Soto, Gervith
    Ortiz-Sanchez, Elizabeth
    Herrera-Montalvo, Luis Alonso
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [36] Brain Tumor Classification: Feature Fusion
    Amin, Javeria
    Sharif, Muhammad
    Raza, Mudassar
    Saba, Tanzila
    Rehman, Amjad
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES (ICCIS), 2019, : 497 - 502
  • [37] PREOPERATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RADIOLOGICAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH TUMOR-BRAIN ADHESION IN INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMA
    Joo, W.
    Hong, Y.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (06) : 1094 - 1094
  • [38] A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique to Evaluate Tumor-Brain Adhesion in Meningioma: Brain-Surface Motion Imaging
    Yamada, Shuichi
    Taoka, Toshiaki
    Nakagawa, Ichiro
    Nishimura, Fumihiko
    Motoyama, Yasushi
    Park, Young S.
    Nakase, Hiroyuki
    Kichikawa, Kimihiko
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 83 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [39] An In Vitro Model of Glioblastoma and the Brain Tumor Microenvironment
    Sivakumar, H.
    Devarasetty, M.
    Skardal, A.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2016, 22 : S44 - S44
  • [40] Advances in Brain Tumor Surgery for Glioblastoma in Adults
    Lara-Velazquez, Montserrat
    Al-Kharboosh, Rawan
    Jeanneret, Stephanie
    Vazquez-Ramos, Carla
    Mahato, Deependra
    Tavanaiepour, Daryoush
    Rahmathulla, Gazanfar
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2017, 7 (12)