Short-term Safety of Robot-assisted Rectal Surgery in Patients Aged ≥75 Years: A Single-center Retrospective Study

被引:0
|
作者
Teraishi, Fuminori [1 ,2 ]
Yoshida, Yusuke [1 ]
Shoji, Ryohei [1 ]
Kanaya, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Matsumi, Yuki [1 ,2 ]
Shigeyasu, Kunitoshi [1 ]
Kondo, Yoshitaka [1 ]
Kagawa, Shunsuke [1 ]
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, 2-5-1 Shikata Cho,Kita Ku, Okayama 7008558, Japan
[2] Okayama Univ Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas Therapy Ctr, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Robot assisted surgery; older patients; rectal cancer; short - term outcome; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; OLDER;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.17516
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: The aging population challenges surgical management of rectal cancer. This study evaluated the short-term safety of robot-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) in patients aged 75 years and older, examining perioperative complications and surgical outcomes in this vulnerable population. Patients and Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at Okayama University Hospital from September 2020 to December 2024, including 109 patients undergoing RARS. Patients were divided into older (>= 75 years, n=19) and non-older (<75 years, n=90) groups. Surgical procedures utilized the da Vinci Xi system, with comprehensive assessment of perioperative characteristics and complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: The older group demonstrated significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (89.5% >= 2 vs. 58.9% in non-older group, p=0.036). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the older group (8 vs. 18 cases, p=0.04), though severe complications were similar to those in the non-older group. Median postoperative hospital stay was longer in the older group (12 vs. 9 days, p=0.01), but this difference disappeared when excluding stoma cases. Critically, no postoperative mortality was observed within 30 days in either group. Conclusion: Robot-assisted rectal surgery appears safe for patients aged 75 years and older. While the older group experienced more complications, these were predominantly manageable. The findings suggest that careful patient selection and experienced surgical teams can successfully employ robotic techniques in older patients while maintaining oncological standards.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resections for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes of a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial
    Xu, J.
    Wei, Y.
    Ren, L.
    Feng, Q.
    Chen, J.
    Zhu, D.
    Chang, W.
    Yi, T.
    Yang, L.
    Qin, X.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [22] Impact of ERAS compliance on the short-term outcomes for distal radius surgery: a single-center retrospective study
    Zha, Mi Er A. Li Mu Mu Er Ti
    Sun, Zhi Jian
    Li, Ting
    Ti, Re Zi Ya Ai Mai
    Fu, Gang
    Yao, Dong Chen
    Yu, Xiang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [23] Impact of ERAS compliance on the short-term outcomes for distal radius surgery: a single-center retrospective study
    Mi Er A. Li Mu Mu Er Ti Zha
    Zhi Jian Sun
    Ting Li
    Re Zi Ya Ai Mai Ti
    Gang Fu
    Dong Chen Yao
    Xiang Yu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [24] Predictors of short-term mortality after rheumatic heart valve surgery: A single-center retrospective study
    Ibrahim, Khalid S.
    Kheirallah, Khalid A.
    Mayyas, Fadia A.
    Alwaqfi, Nizar R.
    Alawami, Murtada H.
    Aljarrah, Qusai M.
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 62 : 395 - 401
  • [25] Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study
    Yamanashi, Takahiro
    Miura, Hirohisa
    Tanaka, Toshimichi
    Watanabe, Akiko
    Goto, Takuya
    Yokoi, Keigo
    Kojo, Ken
    Niihara, Masahiro
    Hosoda, Kei
    Kaizu, Takashi
    Yamashita, Keishi
    Sato, Takeo
    Kumamoto, Yusuke
    Hiki, Naoki
    Naitoh, Takeshi
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (04) : 794 - 804
  • [26] Patient satisfaction analysis of robot-assisted minimally invasive adrenalectomy: a single-center retrospective study
    Xue, Yao
    Luo, Xiaoyan
    Tai, Yanghao
    Kang, Wang
    Shang, Jiwen
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [27] Comparing short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients
    Yang, Hao
    Yang, Gang
    Wu, Wen-Ya
    Wang, Fang
    Yao, Xue-Quan
    Wu, Xiao-Yu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (05):
  • [28] Impact of surgical site infection on short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a two-center retrospective study
    Lin, Shuangming
    Zeng, Hao
    Wang, Xiaojie
    Xue, Xueyi
    Chen, Yushuo
    Liao, Baodong
    Huang, Ying
    Xu, Dongbo
    Chi, Pan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2025, 40 (01)
  • [29] Characteristics and outcomes of 3099 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for renal tumors: A 10-year single-center retrospective study
    Guo, H.
    Yang, W.
    Chen, Z.
    Chen, Z.
    Liu, G.
    Ji, C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S1520 - S1520
  • [30] Short-Term Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Ankle Fracture Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Yao, Yuefeng
    Li, Guoqing
    Li, Jing
    Liu, Su
    Chen, Yixiao
    Deng, Jiapeng
    Wei, Yihao
    Gao, Liang
    Wang, Deli
    Zeng, Hui
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (03) : 766 - 776