Advancing pumped thermal energy storage performance and cost using silica storage media

被引:1
|
作者
Mctigue, Joshua [1 ]
Hirschey, Jason [1 ]
Ma, Zhiwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
Pumped thermal energy storage; Carnot battery; Particle thermal energy storage; Long duration energy storage; Molten salts; INTEGRATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125567
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Pumped Thermal Energy Storage (PTES) is an electricity storage system that is suitable for long-duration energy storage (10-1000 h) due to its low marginal cost of energy capacity. We present a techno-economic model of a PTES system that uses particle thermal energy storage. Particles have low costs and can be operated over a wide temperature range leading to increased efficiency and reduced costs compared to other PTES designs. We show how the round-trip efficiency, specific power output, capital cost, and levelized cost of storage (LCOS) depend on parameters such as the pressure ratio, heat exchanger approach temperature and pressure loss, and maximum temperature. We compare particle-PTES (P-PTES) performance to PTES which uses liquid thermal energy storage - i.e. molten salt hot storage and methanol cold storage (MS-PTES). We find that using silica particles for storage advances PTES technology: P-PTES can be operated at higher maximum temperatures than MS-PTES. Furthermore, P-PTES can achieve lower approach temperatures in the heat exchangers than MS-PTES without increasing capital costs, because P-PTES uses direct-contact heat transfer in fluidized bed heat exchangers. As a result, we find that P-PTES systems achieve higher round-trip efficiency than MS-PTES (66 % versus 57 %) and lower LCOS (e.g. 0.115 +/- 0.03 $/kWhe versus 0.171 +/- 0.04 $/kWhe for 10 h discharge). The low cost of particles and containment means that P-PTES can provide long-duration energy storage at low capital cost per unit energy capacity. For example, the total capital cost per unit energy reduces from 245 $/kWhe at 10 h to 38 $/kWhe at 100 h. These costs are considerably lower than MS-PTES (72 $/kWhe at 100 h) and also outcompete current and future Li-ion battery system projections (100-265 $/kWhe).
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost Minimization using Renewable Cooling and Thermal Energy Storage in CDNs
    Lee, Stephen
    Urgaonkar, Rahul
    Sitaraman, Ramesh
    Shenoy, Prashant
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMIC COMPUTING, 2015, : 121 - 126
  • [32] Levelised Cost of Storage for Pumped Heat Energy Storage in comparison with other energy storage technologies (vol 152, pg 221, 2017)
    Smallbone, Andrew
    Juelch, Verena
    Wardle, Robin
    Roskilly, Anthony Paul
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 210
  • [33] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE USING NATURAL POROUS MEDIA
    Al Edhari, A. J.
    Ngo, C. C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2017 VOL 8, 2018,
  • [34] Thermal conductivity enhancement of energy storage media using carbon fibers
    Fukai, J
    Kanou, M
    Kodama, Y
    Miyatake, O
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 41 (14) : 1543 - 1556
  • [35] On the operational characteristics and economic value of pumped thermal energy storage
    Martinek, Janna
    Jorgenson, Jennie
    McTigue, Joshua D.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2022, 52
  • [36] Thermal performance of organic PCMs/micronized silica composite for latent heat thermal energy storage
    Chung, Okyoung
    Jeong, Su-Gwang
    Yu, Seulgi
    Kim, Sumin
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 70 : 180 - 185
  • [37] Simplified pumped thermal energy storage using a two-way Stirling cycle
    Nilsson, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 73
  • [38] Pumped storage technology combined with thermal energy storage – Power station and pressure tunnel concept
    Pumpspeichertechnologie kombiniert mit thermischer Energiespeicherung – Kraftwerks- und Druckstollenkonzept
    1600, Ernst und Sohn (10):
  • [39] An Evaluation of Energy Storage Cost and Performance Characteristics
    Mongird, Kendall
    Viswanathan, Vilayanur
    Balducci, Patrick
    Alam, Jan
    Fotedar, Vanshika
    Koritarov, Vladimir
    Hadjerioua, Boualem
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (13)
  • [40] Pumped Thermal Energy Storage and Bottoming System Part B: Sensitivity analysis and baseline performance
    Abarr, Miles
    Hertzberg, Jean
    Montoya, Lupita D.
    ENERGY, 2017, 119 : 601 - 611