Accurate Event Camera Calibration With Fourier Transform

被引:0
|
作者
Cai, Bolin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zi, Ami [1 ]
Yang, Jun [4 ]
Li, Guoliang [4 ]
Zhang, Yang [4 ]
Wu, Qiujie [1 ]
Tong, Chenen
Liu, Wenxiang
Chen, Xiangcheng [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Internet, Hefei 230039, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Natl Engn Res Ctr Agroecol Big Data Anal & Applica, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Hefei Inst Technol Innovat Engn, Hefei 230094, Peoples R China
[4] Northwest Inst Nucl Technol, Xian 710613, Peoples R China
[5] Anhui Univ, Sch Artificial Intelligence & Informat Mat, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[6] Anhui Univ, Intelligent Sensing Lab Anhui Prov, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Event camera calibration; feature points; Fourier transform; phase domain;
D O I
10.1109/TIM.2024.3470063
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Event camera calibration plays an irreplaceable role in event camera-based visual applications. Event cameras report per-pixel brightness changes as a stream of asynchronous events, making them insensitive to the spatial distribution of feature points. Consequently, traditional methods such as checkerboard and circle calibration algorithms, which rely on spatial intensity distribution for feature point extraction, are ill-suited for event camera calibration. To address this issue, a flexible and accurate event camera calibration method is presented in this work. The method analyzes the frequency characteristics of event data streams, introducing the groundbreaking use of Fourier transform in event camera calibration. Instead of relying on intensity, we extract feature points from the robust phase domain, which mitigates the impact of event camera noise. Event frames are derived from the event data streams, and we recover two crossed-phase maps using the Fourier transform. Feature points are then detected using the law of phase distribution and refined with sub-pixel accuracy. Subsequently, camera parameters are estimated. The performance of our method was rigorously validated from different perspectives, and the results show that the accuracy of the proposed method is substantially improved compared to the conventional methods. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the proposed method are consistently below 0.06 pixels, with some cases achieving an impressive 0.03 pixels. The accuracy of binocular reconstruction reaches 0.394 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accurate and Practical Calibration of a Depth and Color Camera Pair
    Herrera C, Daniel
    Kannala, Juho
    Heikkila, Janne
    COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF IMAGES AND PATTERNS: 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, CAIP 2011, PT 2, 2011, 6855 : 437 - 445
  • [42] Accurate and robust marker localization algorithm for camera calibration
    Redert, A
    Hendriks, E
    Biemond, J
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON 3D DATA PROCESSING VISUALIZATION AND TRANSMISSION, 2002, : 522 - 525
  • [43] Accurate numerical Fourier transform in d-dimensions
    Beaudoin, N
    Beauchemin, SS
    SYMBOLIC AND NUMERICAL SCIENTIFIC COMPUTATION, 2003, 2630 : 266 - 278
  • [45] The accurate calculation of the Fourier transform of the pure Voigt function
    He, J
    Zhang, CM
    JOURNAL OF OPTICS A-PURE AND APPLIED OPTICS, 2005, 7 (10): : 613 - 616
  • [46] An accurate error analysis model for fast Fourier transform
    Ma, YT
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1997, 45 (06) : 1641 - 1645
  • [47] RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF FOURIER-TRANSFORM SEMICONDUCTOR PHOTOLUMINESCENCE
    ROWELL, NL
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOURIER TRANSFORM SPECTROSCOPY, 1989, 1145 : 636 - 638
  • [48] Calibration algorithm for Fourier transform spectrometer with thermal instabilities
    Turbide, Simon
    Smithson, Tracy
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2010, 49 (17) : 3411 - 3417
  • [49] Fast Fourier Transform based calibration in remote sensing
    Peleg, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 19 (12) : 2301 - 2315
  • [50] Accurate mass measurements by Fourier transform mass spectrometry
    Zhang, LK
    Rempel, D
    Pramanik, BN
    Gross, ML
    MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS, 2005, 24 (02) : 286 - 309