Clinical factors influencing residual subcutaneous tissue after skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Turna, Menekse [1 ]
Caglar, Hale Basak [1 ]
机构
[1] Anadolu Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kocaeli, Turkiye
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
residual fibroglandular tissue; skin-sparing mastectomy; nipple-sparing mastectomy; breast reconstruction; postoperative radiotherapy; CONSERVING SURGERY; RECURRENCE RATES; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2025.1516479
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have emerged as increasingly preferred alternatives to traditional mastectomy, largely due to their enhanced cosmetic outcomes and elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, the oncological safety and implications associated with residual breast tissue in these surgical procedures continue to raise significant concerns. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of various clinical and surgical factors on residual subcutaneous tissue in patients undergoing SSM and NSM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed breast cancer patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy following SSM and NSM with immediate breast reconstruction from November 2020 to April 2024. Clinical and demographic data, including age, tumor size, axillary staging, molecular subtype, genetic analysis, and surgical details, were systematically collected. Additionally, radiation treatment planning CT scans were assessed to measure residual subcutaneous tissue thickness at multiple anatomical regions. The correlation between residual subcutaneous tissue thickness and clinical factors was subsequently analyzed. Results: The median age was 45 years (range, 31-61). Among the total patients, 20 underwent SSM (52.63%), and 18 underwent NSM (47.37%). An acceptable residual subcutaneous tissue distance (<= 5 mm) was observed in 21 breasts (55.26%), while 17 breasts (44.74%) did not meet this criterion. Analysis demonstrated a statistically significant but modest positive correlation between RFT thickness and age (r = 0.38, p = 0.02), minimal positive correlation was observed between RFT thickness and clinical tumor size (r = 0.08, p = 0.042). A significant effect of contralateral breast surgery on residual subcutaneous tissue thickness was noted (F = 8.38, p < 0.001). Additionally, the results also revealed a statistically significant inverse correlation between RFT thickness and axillary involvement (r = -0.18, p = 0.005), suggesting that thicker flaps are associated with reduced axillary involvement. There was no significant difference in RFT thickness between NSM and SSM groups (Chi(2) = 0.47, p = 0.491). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients undergoing SSM and NSM exhibit residual subcutaneous tissue thickness that exceeds acceptable limits, which may vary based on clinical and pathological factors. Further research involving larger cohorts and prospective designs is essential to identify additional contributing factors and optimize indications for postoperative radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy
    Agha, R. A.
    Al Omran, Y.
    Wellstead, G.
    Sagoo, H.
    Barai, I
    Rajmohan, S.
    Borrelli, M. R.
    Vella-Baldacchino, M.
    Orgill, D. P.
    Rusby, J. E.
    BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (02): : 135 - 145
  • [22] Immediate reconstruction after complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autologous tissue
    Hidalgo, DA
    Borgen, PJ
    Petrek, JA
    Heerdt, AH
    Cody, HS
    Disa, JJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 187 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [23] Nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by the "moving window" operation
    Ohno, Yukako
    Noguchi, Masakuni
    Yokoi-Noguchi, Miki
    Nakano, Yasuharu
    Shimada, Ken-ichi
    Yamamoto, Yasunori
    Kawakami, Shigehiko
    BREAST CANCER, 2013, 20 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [24] Results ed immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy
    Carlson, GW
    Losken, A
    Moore, B
    Thornton, J
    Elliott, M
    Bolitho, G
    Denson, DD
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 46 (03) : 222 - 228
  • [25] Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    van Verschuer, Victorien M. T.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Gopie, Jessica P.
    Vos, Elvira L.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [26] Nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by the “moving window” operation
    Yukako Ohno
    Masakuni Noguchi
    Miki Yokoi-Noguchi
    Yasuharu Nakano
    Ken-ichi Shimada
    Yasunori Yamamoto
    Shigehiko Kawakami
    Breast Cancer, 2013, 20 : 54 - 61
  • [27] Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    Brooks, Ashton J.
    Myckatyn, Terence
    Margenthaler, Julie A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 2) : S389 - S390
  • [28] IS THE SENSITIVITY OF SKIN-SPARING MASTECTOMY OR NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY SUPERIOR TO CONVENTIONAL MASTECTOMY WITH INNERVATED FLAP?
    Mori, Hiroki
    Okazaki, Mutsumi
    MICROSURGERY, 2011, 31 (06) : 428 - 433
  • [29] Nipple Pathology in Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Implications for Immediate Reconstruction
    Wong, Lesley
    Wilson, Ryan M.
    Snapp, W. Kelsey
    Bole, Raevti
    Vyas, Krishna S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 : S340 - S343
  • [30] Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy
    van Verschuer, Victorien M. T.
    Maijers, Marike C.
    van Deurzen, Carolien H. M.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2015, 4 (06) : 467 - 475