Impact of Class III Obesity (Morbid Obesity) on the Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Jaber, Abdel Rahman [1 ]
Saikali, Shady [1 ]
Moschovas, Marcio Covas [1 ,2 ]
Gamal, Ahmed [1 ]
Patel, Ela [1 ]
Sandri, Marco [3 ]
Rogers, Travis [1 ]
Patel, Vipul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] AdventHlth Global Robot Inst, Celebration, FL 34747 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida UCF, Urol Dept, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[3] Big & Open Data Innovat Lab BODaI Lab & Data Metho, I-25122 Brescia, Italy
关键词
class III obesity; morbid obesity; radical prostatectomy; robotic-assisted; CANCER;
D O I
10.3390/cancers17040709
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The growing prevalence of obesity, particularly morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2), presents unique challenges in surgical management. In robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer, morbid obesity is associated with longer operative times, increased blood loss, and complex nerve-sparing procedures. These challenges may impact functional and oncological outcomes, making it essential to understand how high BMI affects RARP results. However, data on outcomes for patients with morbid obesity remain limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 14,444 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon from 2008 to 2023. A total of 183 patients with morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2) were matched 1:1 with 183 normal-weight patients (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)) using propensity-score matching based on age, PSA levels, clinical staging, ISUP grade, comorbidities, and baseline urinary and sexual function scores. We compared perioperative variables, complications, and oncological and functional outcomes between groups. Results: Patients with morbid obesity had longer console times (median 90 vs. 75 min, p < 0.001) and higher rates of estimated blood loss over 100 mL (39% vs. 22%, p = 0.001). Full nerve-sparing was less frequent in this group (16.9% vs. 38.8%, p < 0.001), and postoperative lymphocele formation rates were higher (12.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.021). While patients with morbid obesity demonstrated a higher incidence of pT3a disease (34.4% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.015), no significant differences were observed in BCR and PSM (24% vs. 18%, p = 0.25) or functional outcomes, such as potency and urinary continence, at 12 and 24 months after operation. Conclusions: RARP in patients with morbid obesity is safe and feasible, with low rates of complications and no observed differences in functional and oncological outcomes compared to normal-weight patients. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes in this growing patient population.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of obesity on pulmonary deterioration in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Blecha, Sebastian
    Harth, Marion
    Zeman, Florian
    Seyfried, Timo
    Lubnow, Matthias
    Burger, Maximilian
    Denzinger, Stefan
    Pawlik, Michael T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2019, 33 (01) : 133 - 143
  • [42] Does Presence of a Median Lobe Affect Perioperative Complications, Oncological Outcomes and Urinary Continence Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
    Hamidi, Nurullah
    Atmaca, Ali Fuat
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    Keske, Murat
    Gok, Bahri
    Koc, Erdem
    Asil, Erem
    Ardicoglu, Arslan
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (05) : 248 - 255
  • [43] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Patel, Manoj B.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) : 1428 - 1435
  • [44] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES IN AFRICAN-AMERICANS AFTER ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Decastro, G. Joel
    Jayram, Gautam
    Shikanov, Sergey
    Razmaria, Aria
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E416 - E416
  • [45] Anatomical Fundamentals and Current Surgical Knowledge of Prostate Anatomy Related to Functional and Oncological Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Wenzel, Mike
    Hohenhorst, Lukas
    Koellermann, Jens
    Graefen, Markus
    Haese, Alexander
    Tilki, Derya
    Walz, Jochen
    Kosiba, Marina
    Becker, Andreas
    Banek, Severine
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Mandel, Philipp
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Preisser, Felix
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 8
  • [46] Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy
    Ahlering, TE
    Eichel, L
    Edwards, R
    Skarecky, DW
    UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) : 740 - 744
  • [47] The impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 : A127 - A127
  • [48] Impact of trainee involvement with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Thomas A.A.
    Derboghossians A.
    Chang A.
    Karia R.
    Finley D.S.
    Slezak J.
    Jacobsen S.J.
    Chien G.W.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (3) : 289 - 293
  • [49] Consumerism and its impact on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Alkhateeb, Sultan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1874 - 1878
  • [50] Re: Clipless Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Impact on Outcomes Editorial Comment
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (03): : 735 - 736