Refurbishing used GPS transmitters improves performance for subsequent deployments on greater sage-grouse

被引:0
|
作者
Chelak, Melissa S. [1 ]
Kohl, Michel T. [2 ]
Small, Justin R. [3 ]
Smith, Kurt T. [4 ]
Pratt, Aaron C. [4 ]
Beck, Jeffrey L. [4 ]
Backen, Codi R. [1 ]
Flack, M. Brandon [5 ]
Wayment, Hailey P. [1 ]
Wood, Jason A. [6 ]
Howell, Ryan [6 ]
Strange, Trevon D. [1 ]
Mcdonald, Lucian R. [1 ]
Manlove, Kezia R. [1 ]
Frey, Shandra N. [1 ]
Larsen, Randy T. [6 ]
Maxfield, Brian A. [7 ]
Dahlgren, David K. [1 ]
Messmer, Terry A. [1 ]
Stoner, David C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, 180 Green St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Nevada Dept Wildlife, 6980 Sierra Ctr Pkwy, Reno, NV 89511 USA
[4] Univ Wyoming, 1000 Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[5] Idaho Dept Fish & Game, 600 S Walnut St, Boise, ID 83712 USA
[6] Brigham Young Univ, 800 N 580 E St, Provo, UT 84606 USA
[7] Utah Div Wildlife Resources, 318 North Vernal Ave, Vernal, UT 84078 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2025年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
<italic>Centrocercus urophasianus</italic>; fix success; GPS location error; GPS performance; greater sage-grouse; solar-powered GPS transmitters; Utah; Wyoming; COLLAR PERFORMANCE; FIX SUCCESS; HABITAT; TECHNOLOGY; MOVEMENTS; SELECTION; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; RATES; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1566
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) radio transmitters are increasingly used across taxa to monitor animal populations. However, GPS transmitters can be susceptible to malfunctions that may result in location errors or data loss causing potential inferential bias that can have important implications for monitored species. Research using GPS transmitters on greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) has increased, but few sage-grouse studies have evaluated GPS performance. Because sage-grouse management has been subject to intense legal and political scrutiny with consequential economic implications, reliable data acquisition is central to informed decision-making for the species. We evaluated differences in the performance of 2 commonly used solar-powered GPS transmitters (Microwave Telemetry, Inc. [MTI], Columbia, MD, USA and GeoTrak, Inc., Apex, NC, USA) deployed on sage-grouse throughout Wyoming from 2011 to 2017 and Utah from 2013 to 2019. Our investigation of GPS performance included daily fix inefficiency, the number of 1-day fix gaps, and transmitter loss rate. We also evaluated transmitter functionality during the nesting period including daily nesting fix inefficiency, fix error distance mean and standard deviation (i.e., accuracy and precision), and mean fix error direction. New and refurbished MTI transmitters outperformed GeoTrak transmitters in daily fix inefficiency and day gaps during most seasons. Cumulatively redeployed MTI transmitters did not perform differently than GeoTrak transmitters. Transmitter loss, daily nesting fix inefficiency, and nest fix precision did not vary significantly between the 2 transmitters. GeoTrak performed better than MTI for nest fix accuracy across all latitudes (40-45 degrees N). The mean error direction to the nest location ranged between 105 degrees and 135 degrees for GeoTrak and between 135 degrees and 155 degrees for MTI. We recommend refurbishing transmitters following deployment to retain higher fix efficiency than cumulatively redeploying transmitters.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Male Greater Sage-Grouse Movements Among Leks
    Fremgen, Aleshia L.
    Rota, Christopher T.
    Hansen, Christopher P.
    Rumble, Mark A.
    Gamo, R. Scott
    Millspaugh, Joshua J.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 (03): : 498 - 508
  • [22] Greater sage-grouse population trends across Wyoming
    Edmunds, David R.
    Aldridge, Cameron L.
    O'Donnell, Michael S.
    Monroe, Adrian P.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 82 (02): : 397 - 412
  • [23] Temporal variation in diet and nutrition of preincubating greater sage-grouse
    Gregg, Michael A.
    Barnett, Jenny K.
    Crawford, John A.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 61 (05) : 535 - 542
  • [24] Impacts of coyote removal on space use by greater sage-grouse
    Orning, Elizabeth K.
    Young, Julie K.
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2016, 10 (02): : 144 - 156
  • [25] Necklace-style radio-transmitters are associated with changes in display vocalizations of male greater sage-grouse
    Fremgen, Marcella R.
    Gibson, Daniel
    Ehrlich, Rebecca L.
    Krakauer, Alan H.
    Forbey, Jennifer S.
    Blomberg, Erik J.
    Sedinger, James S.
    Patricelli, Gail L.
    WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2017,
  • [26] Comparing Methods of Defining Priority Areas for Greater Sage-Grouse
    Parsons, Lindsey
    Jenks, Jonathan
    Runia, Travis
    Gregory, Andrew
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 10
  • [27] Predators of Greater Sage-Grouse nests identified by video monitoring
    Coates, Peter S.
    Connelly, John W.
    Delehanty, David J.
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2008, 79 (04) : 421 - 428
  • [28] A comparative behavioral study of three Greater Sage-Grouse populations
    Taylor, SE
    Young, JR
    WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2006, 118 (01): : 36 - 41
  • [29] Greater Sage-Grouse and Fences: Does Marking Reduce Collisions?
    Stevens, Bryan S.
    Reese, Kerry P.
    Connelly, John W.
    Musil, David D.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2012, 36 (02): : 297 - 303
  • [30] Estimation of greater sage-grouse survival in North Park, Colorado
    Zablan, MA
    Braun, CE
    White, GC
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2003, 67 (01): : 144 - 154