Effects of wire rope isolators on seismic life-cycle cost of UHV bypass switch

被引:1
|
作者
He, Chang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Kunning [2 ]
Jiang, Liqiang [1 ,3 ]
Xie, Qiang [2 ]
Yang, Zhenyu [4 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, 1239 Siping St, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Engn Res Ctr High Speed Railway Construct Tec, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Guangzhou Univ, Earthquake Engn Res & Test Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
UHV bypass switch; Seismic life-cycle cost; Seismic cost risk; Seismic cost vulnerability; DESIGN CRITERIA; BASE-ISOLATION; BUILDINGS; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104917
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The seismic isolation devices reduce the seismic vulnerability of the electrical equipment. Accurately assessing the seismic life-cycle cost (SLCC) of the electrical equipment is beneficial in guiding the design and enhancing the seismic resilience of electrical substations and converter stations. To evaluate the effects of the isolator devices on the seismic life-cycle cost of electrical equipment, a SLCC evaluation model was proposed in this study, and the evaluation was conducted on an ultra-high voltage (UHV) bypass switch (BPS) with wire rope isolators (WRI). The model takes into account equipment purchase, maintenance, transportation and installation costs and indirect losses caused by power outages. Afterward, the SLCC and break-even time of the UHV BPS with and without WRIs in different regions were analyzed. The results indicate that beyond the break-even time, the BPS with WRIs becomes more economically viable. Moreover, its economic viability increases as the service life extends. Therefore, in high seismic cost risk areas, it is recommended to adopt seismic isolation devices to ensure the secure and economically efficient operation of electrical equipment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LOGISTICS OF LIFE-CYCLE COST
    PERONNET, JR
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1979, 19 (1-2): : 23 - 30
  • [22] Life-cycle cost modeling
    1600, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd (04):
  • [23] LIFE-CYCLE COST - A SURVEY
    DHILLON, BS
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1981, 21 (04): : 495 - 511
  • [24] Life-cycle cost effective optimal seismic design for continuous PSC bridges
    Lee, KM
    Cho, HN
    Lim, JK
    Park, KH
    LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF DETERIORATING STRUCTURES: ASSESSMENT, DESIGN, AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, : 247 - 262
  • [25] Effect of cumulative seismic damage on life-cycle cost of reinforced concrete bridges
    Kumar, R.
    Gardoni, P.
    Sanchez-Silva, M.
    LIFE-CYCLE CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2008, : 819 - 824
  • [26] Life-cycle performance and cost analysis of bridge network considering seismic risk
    Furuta, H.
    Koyama, K.
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    RELIABILITY AND OPTIMIZATION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT, DESIGN AND LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE, 2007, : 15 - +
  • [27] An integrated system for simplified seismic performance evaluation and life-cycle cost analysis
    Javidan, Mohammad Mahdi
    Kim, Jinkoo
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 45
  • [28] Effects of Maintenance Strategies on the Life-cycle Performance and Cost of a Deteriorating RC Building with High-Seismic Hazard
    Chiu, Chien-Kuo
    Noguchi, Takafumi
    Kanematsu, Manabu
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 8 (02) : 157 - 170
  • [29] Monobores improve life-cycle cost
    不详
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 51 (02): : 69 - 70
  • [30] RELIABILITY INVESTMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE COST
    SEGER, JK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1983, 32 (03) : 259 - 263