A new validated ophthalmic patient questionnaire for cataract and lens surgery CLOQ: cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Fabian, E. [1 ]
Eberwein, Ph. [1 ,2 ]
Mueller, M. [1 ]
Fabian, K. [1 ,3 ]
Weisensee, J. [1 ,4 ]
Langenbucher, A. [4 ]
Heine, J. -H [5 ]
机构
[1] AugenCtr Rosenheim, Bahnhofstr 12, D-83021 Rosenheim, Germany
[2] Augenuniv Klin Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Augenklin, Klin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Saarland, Inst Expt Ophthalmol, Homburg Saar, Germany
[5] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen LMU, Munich, Germany
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGIE | 2025年 / 122卷 / 02期
关键词
QoL und QoV; Brillenabh & auml; ngigkeiten; IRT-/Rasch-Analyse; Subjektive Qualit & auml; tssicherung; PROM-Validierung; QoL and QoV; Spectacle dependence; IRT-/Rasch-analysis; Subjective quality assurance; PROM validation; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00347-024-02155-w
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: The new patient cataract and lens ophthalmic questionnaire (CLOQ) determines subjective patient satisfaction before and after cataract surgery according to item response theory (IRT). Methods: A total of 317 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of different intraocular lens (IOL) types were included. The questionnaire (37 questions) is divided into questions on visual acuity-relevant quality of life (VRQoL), quality of vision (QoV), spectacle dependence, and general satisfaction. For all questions, five response categories are available. Analysis is performed by determining the model parameters/item characteristic curves. Testing of the model is performed by expected score curves, infit/outfit statistics, and determination of reliability and Cronbach's alpha. Results: The IRT analyses for the QoL and QoV questions showed 1. a clear order of threshold parameters in the multilevel response scale; 2. a good fit of the response model of the empirical and the expected score curves; 3. unidimensionality, with values of < 1 for the mean square in- and outfit statistics; and 4. reliability of FWLE = 0.87 and 0.71, respectively. The post-surgical improvement is clearly evident in the higher person parameters, spectacle dependency, and better visual acuity. Conclusion: Standard calculations were performed for model parameters, model tests, and reliability based on a partial credit model. The results confirm the suitability for evaluation of subjective patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 129
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LENS IMPLANTATION IN CATARACT-SURGERY
    HIRST, LW
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1987, 147 (09) : 472 - 472
  • [22] LENS IMPLANTATION IN CATARACT-SURGERY
    THOMSON, G
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1988, 148 (10) : 542 - 542
  • [23] Cataract Surgery With Implantation of an Artificial Lens
    Kohnen, T.
    Baumeister, M.
    Kook, D.
    Klaproth, O. K.
    Ohrloff, C.
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 106 (43): : 695 - U11
  • [24] CATARACT-SURGERY AND LENS IMPLANTATION
    LINDSTROM, RL
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 3 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [25] LENS IMPLANTATION IN CATARACT-SURGERY
    LANDERS, JAG
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1987, 147 (04) : 207 - 207
  • [26] CATARACT-SURGERY AND LENS IMPLANTATION
    不详
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 2 (01) : 95 - 103
  • [27] LENS IMPLANTS IN CATARACT-SURGERY
    CAMUZET, F
    BOURDIOL, AM
    GRANDPERRET, A
    MATHIS, A
    ARNE, JL
    BEC, P
    NOUVELLE REVUE DE MEDECINE DE TOULOUSE, 1984, 2 (04): : 153 - 157
  • [28] Instillation of Ophthalmic Formulation Containing Nilvadipine Nanocrystals Attenuates Lens Opacification in Shumiya Cataract Rats
    Goto, Ryoka
    Yamada, Shigehiro
    Otake, Hiroko
    Nakazawa, Yosuke
    Oka, Mikako
    Yamamoto, Naoki
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Nagai, Noriaki
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [29] Cataract Surgery With Implantation of an Artificial Lens
    Huenig, Siegfried
    Huenig, Georg
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 107 (09): : 151 - 151
  • [30] ARTIFICIAL LENS IN CATARACT-SURGERY
    LEBUISSON, DA
    COUDERC, JL
    REVUE DU PRATICIEN, 1981, 31 (01): : 95 - 99