Image Quality Difference Perception Ability: A BIQA model effectiveness metric based on model falsification method

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Jinchi [1 ]
Ma, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Yu, Dingguo [1 ]
Li, Yuying [1 ]
Zhao, Yidan [2 ]
机构
[1] Commun Univ Zhejiang, 998 Xueyuan St, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Ocean Univ, 999 Hucheng Ring Rd, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
关键词
Blind image quality assessment; Model comparison; Image quality difference perception ability; Model falsification methodology; Performance metric;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125349
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Blind Image Quality Assessment (BIQA) methods refer to algorithms that predict image quality scores without reference images. This challenging area is crucial for preprocessing and optimizing visual tasks. Since BIQA is a small-sample task, it has become a common practice to apply transfer learning by using models pre-trained on other visual tasks, such as semantic recognition, to BIQA. This paper is interested in whether a backbone that performs better in semantic recognition also improves predictive accuracy in BIQA tasks. Comparative experiments showed that different semantic backbones with varying precision exhibit minimal differences in PLCC (Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient) and SRCC (Spearman Rank Order Correlation Coefficient). However, further comparison shows that the semantic backbone does enhance the model's IQA abilities, which traditional metrics fail to capture due to their oversight of quality differences between images. We term this ability as Image Quality Difference Perception Ability (IQDP Ability). Based on this, we propose an IQDP comparison method and a new metric, which can effectively compare and measure a model's IQDP Ability, supplementing traditional metrics and providing an effective means of identifying superior models.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Objective assessment method of image quality based on visual perception of image content
    Yao Jun-Cai
    Liu Gui-Zhong
    ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2018, 67 (10)
  • [32] Predicting the effects of defocus blur on contrast sensitivity with a model-based metric of retinal image quality
    Leroux, Charles
    Fontvieille, Christophe
    Leahy, Conor
    Marc, Isabelle
    Bardin, Fabrice
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2022, 39 (10) : 1866 - 1873
  • [33] Reduced-reference image quality metric based on statistic model in complex wavelet transform domain
    Xie, Xinwen
    Carre, Philippe
    Perrine, Clency
    Pousset, Yannis
    Zhou, Nanrun
    Wu, Jianhua
    SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2019, 74 : 218 - 230
  • [34] Stereoscopic image quality assessment method based on binocular combination saliency model
    Liu, Yun
    Yang, Jiachen
    Meng, Qinggang
    Lv, Zhihan
    Song, Zhanjie
    Gao, Zhiqun
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 125 : 237 - 248
  • [35] A new perceptual image quality assessment method based on total variation model
    Wu, Ya-Dong
    Zhang, Hong-Ying
    Dianzi Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2015, 44 (01): : 79 - 83
  • [36] AN EFFICIENT COLOR IMAGE QUALITY METRIC WITH LOCAL-TUNED-GLOBAL MODEL
    Gu, Ke
    Zhai, Guangtao
    Yang, Xiaokang
    Zhang, Wenjun
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2014, : 506 - 510
  • [37] An Image Quality Assessment Metric with No Reference Using Hidden Markov Tree Model
    Gao, Fei
    Gao, Xinbo
    Lu, Wen
    Tao, Dacheng
    Li, Xuelong
    VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING 2010, 2010, 7744
  • [38] MODEL-BASED QUANTIFICATION OF IMAGE QUALITY
    HAZRA, R
    MILLER, KW
    PARK, SK
    VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING FOR TELEVISION AND TELEROBOTICS, 1989, 3053 : 11 - 22
  • [39] An image quality estimation model based on HVS
    Wei, Xuehui
    Li, Junli
    Chen, Gang
    TENCON 2006 - 2006 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 2006, : 283 - +
  • [40] Image quality assessment based on a degradation model
    Damera-Venkata, N
    Kite, TD
    Geisler, WS
    Evans, BL
    Bovik, AC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2000, 9 (04) : 636 - 650