Outpatient mechanical induction of labor with double balloon catheter. Our three years experience

被引：0
|
作者：
Flores Castillo, M. [1 ]
Medina Mallen, M. [1 ]
Olmos Quiel, D. [1 ]
Paniello Castano, M. [1 ]
Pellicer Sans, C. [1 ]
Terns Freixes, G. [1 ]
Llurba Olive, E. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Hosp Holly Cross & St Paul, Barcelona, Spain
来源：
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION | 2024年 / 54卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
58ASM - 24
引用
收藏
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inpatient versus outpatient double balloon catheter induction of labour satisfaction: A prospective cohort study
    Medina Mallen, M.
    Bailon, M.
    Cruz, M.
    Olmos, D.
    Flores, M.
    Llurba, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 54
  • [22] Double balloon is not superior to single balloon trans-cervical catheter for induction of labor: a meta-analysis
    Katukuri, Vivek
    Blue, Nathan R.
    Holbrook, Bradley D.
    Chao, Conrad R.
    Rayburn, William F.
    Blackstone, Jacquelyn A.
    Mozurkewich, Ellen L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S434 - S434
  • [23] Induction of labor with single- versus double-balloon catheter - a randomized controlled trial
    Haugland, Birte
    Albrechtsen, Susanne
    Lamark, Eva
    Rasmussen, Svein
    Kessler, Jorg
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 : 85 - 85
  • [24] Double-balloon catheter for induction of labor in 362 women with and without prior cesarean section
    Boisen, Anne B.
    Lokkegaard, Ellen C.
    Fuglsang, Jens
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2019, 4
  • [25] Induction of Labor by means of a Double Balloon Catheter: 6 versus 12 Hours in Length of Stay
    Lorenz, Judith
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (08) : 771 - 772
  • [26] Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with double balloon catheter or prostaglandin pessary: A qualitative study
    Coates, Rose
    Cupples, Georgina
    Scamell, Amanda
    McCourt, Christine
    Bhide, Amarnath
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2021, 34 (04) : e406 - e415
  • [27] Mifepristone versus balloon catheter for labor induction: a cohort study
    Radzinsky, Viktor E.
    Startseva, Nadezhda M.
    Doronina, Olga K.
    Teplov, Konstantin, V
    Borisova, Anna, V
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 9331 - 9335
  • [28] Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix
    Chuying Du
    Yukun Liu
    Yinglin Liu
    Hong Ding
    Rui Zhang
    Jianping Tan
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 1221 - 1227
  • [29] Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix
    Du, Chuying
    Liu, Yukun
    Liu, Yinglin
    Ding, Hong
    Zhang, Rui
    Tan, Jianping
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (06) : 1221 - 1227
  • [30] A prospective randomized study comparing induction of labor with the foley catheter and the cervical ripening double balloon catheter in nuliparous and multiparous women
    Solt, Ido
    Ben-Harush, Shani
    Kaminsky, Svetlana
    Sosnovsky, Vladimir
    Ophir, Ella
    Bornstein, Jacob
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S124 - S124
12345