Extending the scope of instrumental variable methods

被引:0
|
作者
Chesher, Andrew [1 ]
Rosen, Adam M. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Econ, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Econ, 213 Social Sci Box 90097, Durham, NC 27708 USA
来源
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL | 2024年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
Instrumental variables; identification; NONPARAMETRIC BOUNDS; MOMENT INEQUALITIES; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; GENERALIZED-METHOD; WEAK INSTRUMENTS; MODELS; PARAMETERS; IDENTIFICATION; SETS; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1093/ectj/utae020
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since Philip Wright's proposal of the linear instrumental variables (IV) estimator in 1928, the scope of application of IV models has greatly expanded. There are now nonlinear IV models in use with both additive and nonadditive latent variables, employing both semiparametric and nonparametric specifications. A notable feature of Wright's linear IV estimator is that it is applicable to incomplete models that leave the genesis of endogenous explanatory variables unspecified. However, inversion of the linear model enables the value of unobservable heterogeneity to be expressed as a function of observable variables. Only recently has the application of incomplete IV models been extended to cases in which this inversion produces a non-singleton set of values of unobservable variables. This situation arises in many models such as those featuring discrete choice, counts, or censored outcomes, or when there are multiple sources of heterogeneity as in random coefficient models, or when economic considerations result in inequality restrictions on values taken by observed and unobserved variables. This paper provides an introduction to the methods set out for analysing such generalized instrumental variable models in Chesher and Rosen (2017). An illustrative example is provided in which an outcome is determined by a random coefficients linear model with an endogenous explanatory variable and instrumental variable exclusion and independence restrictions.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 127
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Resurgence of the Endogeneity-Backed Instrumental Variable Methods
    Qin, Duo
    ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2015, 9
  • [32] Extending the scope of wavelet regression methods by coefficient-dependent thresholding
    Kovac, A
    Silverman, BW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) : 172 - 183
  • [33] Extending the scope of the journal
    G. Lubec
    Amino Acids, 2003, 24 (1) : i - i
  • [34] Extending the Scope of Lectometry
    Rosseel, Laura
    Franco, Karlien
    Roethlisberger, Melanie
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIALEKTOLOGIE UND LINGUISTIK, 2020, 87 (02): : 131 - 143
  • [35] COMPARISON OF SOME INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE METHODS - CONSISTENCY AND ACCURACY ASPECTS
    SODERSTROM, T
    STOICA, P
    AUTOMATICA, 1981, 17 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [36] Instrumental variable methods for identifying partial differential equation models
    Schorsch, Julien
    Garnier, Hugues
    Gilson, Marion
    Young, Peter C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2013, 86 (12) : 2325 - 2335
  • [37] Connecting Instrumental Variable methods for causal inference to the Estimand Framework
    Bowden, Jack
    Bornkamp, Bjoern
    Glimm, Ekkehard
    Bretz, Frank
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (25) : 5605 - 5627
  • [38] Optimal Individualized Decision Rules Using Instrumental Variable Methods
    Qiu, Hongxiang
    Carone, Marco
    Sadikova, Ekaterina
    Petukhova, Maria
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    Luedtke, Alex
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 116 (533) : 174 - 191
  • [39] Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop system identification
    Gilson, M
    Van den Hof, P
    AUTOMATICA, 2005, 41 (02) : 241 - 249
  • [40] Handling Missing Data in Instrumental Variable Methods for Causal Inference
    Kennedy, Edward H.
    Mauro, Jacqueline A.
    Daniels, Michael J.
    Burns, Natalie
    Small, Dylan S.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 6, 2019, 6 : 125 - 148