Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests

被引:0
|
作者
Droppelmann, Guillermo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, Constanza [4 ]
Smague, Dali [4 ]
Jorquera, Carlos [5 ]
Feijoo, Felipe [6 ]
机构
[1] MEDS Clin, Res Ctr Med Exercise Sport & Hlth, Santiago, RM, Chile
[2] Univ Catolica Murcia UCAM, Hlth Sci PhD Program, Murcia, Spain
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Finis Terrae, Fac Med, Santiago, RM, Chile
[5] Univ Mayor, Fac Ciencias, Escuela Nutr & Dietet, Santiago, RM, Chile
[6] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Sch Ind Engn, Valparaiso, Chile
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; diagnostic; orthopedics; radiology; tendinopathy; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1530/EOR-24-0016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
center dot Purpose: Different deep-learning models have been employed to aid in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal pathologies. The diagnosis of tendon pathologies could particularly benefit from applying these technologies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of deep learning models in diagnosing tendon pathologies using various imaging modalities. center dot Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted, with searches performed on MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and SciELO. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to assess the quality of the studies. Diagnostic measures, such as sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive and negative likelihood ratios, area under the curve, and summary receiver operating characteristic, were included using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses were also conducted. All statistical analyses and plots were generated using the R software package. The PROSPERO ID is CRD42024506491. center dot Results: Eleven deep-learning models from six articles were analyzed. In the random effects models, the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithms for detecting tendon conditions were 0.910 (95% CI: 0.865; 0.940) and 0.954 (0.909; 0.977). The PLR, NLR, lnDOR, and AUC estimates were found to be 37.075 (95%CI: 4.654; 69.496), 0.114 (95%CI: 0.056; 0.171), 5.160 (95% CI: 4.070; 6.250) with a (P < 0.001), and 96%, respectively. center dot Conclusion: The deep-learning algorithms demonstrated a high level of accuracy level in detecting tendon anomalies. The overall robust performance suggests their potential application as a valuable complementary tool in diagnosing medical images.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 952
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of deep learning models for infectious keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ong, Zun Zheng
    Sadek, Youssef
    Qureshi, Riaz
    Liu, Alison Su-Hsun
    Ting, Darren S. J.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [2] Application of deep learning models for detection of subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdollahifard, Saeed
    Farrokhi, Amirmohammad
    Mowla, Ashkan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2023, 15 (10) : 995 - +
  • [3] Application of deep learning models for detection of subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Agarwal, Siddharth
    Wood, David A.
    Modat, Marc
    Booth, Thomas C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2023,
  • [4] Deep Learning Models Used in the Diagnostic Workup of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis
    Bodmer, Nicolas S.
    Christensen, Dylan G.
    Bachmann, Lucas M.
    Faes, Livia
    Sanak, Frantisek
    Iselin, Katja
    Kaufmann, Claude
    Thiel, Michael A.
    Baenninger, Philipp B.
    CORNEA, 2024, 43 (07) : 916 - 931
  • [5] Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Chagas Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Candia-Puma, Mayron Antonio
    Machaca-Luque, Laura Yesenia
    Roque-Pumahuanca, Brychs Milagros
    Galdino, Alexsandro Sobreira
    Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro
    Ferraz Coelho, Eduardo Antonio
    Chavez-Fumagalli, Miguel Angel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [6] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schwendicke, Falk
    Chaurasia, Akhilanand
    Arsiwala, Lubaina
    Lee, Jae-Hong
    Elhennawy, Karim
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    Demarco, Flavio
    Krois, Joachim
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (07) : 4299 - 4309
  • [7] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Falk Schwendicke
    Akhilanand Chaurasia
    Lubaina Arsiwala
    Jae-Hong Lee
    Karim Elhennawy
    Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
    Flavio Demarco
    Joachim Krois
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 4299 - 4309
  • [8] Deep Learning for Detection of Periapical Radiolucent Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Sadr, Soroush
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Motamedian, Saeed Reza
    Motie, Parisa
    Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth
    Dianat, Omid
    Nosrat, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2023, 49 (03) : 248 - 261.e3
  • [9] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in detection and prognostication of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chandramohan, Deepak
    Garapati, Hari Naga
    Nangia, Udit
    Simhadri, Prathap K.
    Lapsiwala, Boney
    Jena, Nihar K.
    Singh, Prabhat
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [10] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Deep Learning Detection of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
    Cao, Yuzhu
    Nguchu, Benedictor Alexander
    Monkam, Patrice
    Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa
    Sun, Haotian
    Zheng, Jian
    Yang, Xiaodong
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1507 - 1523