Evaluation of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (GA-68 PSMA PET/CT) in recurrent prostate cancer: a retrospective review of initial clinical experience at Tygerberg Hospital

被引:0
|
作者
Sangiwa, Bright Awadh [1 ]
Burger, Celeste [1 ]
Ellmann, Annare [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Tygerberg Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Prostate cancer; Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT; Tygerberg Hospital; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BONE-SCINTIGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; EANM; MEN;
D O I
10.11604/pamj.2024.48.30.38084
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: prostate cancer recurrence after definitive therapy for organ-confined disease often manifests as rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels without clinically overt disease. (68)Gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen, positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((68)GaPSMA PET/CT) imaging plays a major role in the management of recurrent prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the positivity rate of Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scans in cases of prostate cancer recurrence, and to compare the results with existing international literature. Methods: a retrospective analysis of 177 Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scans of patients with biochemically proven disease recurrence was performed. The possible association of a positive PSMA PET/CT with the PSA level and Gleason score were analyzed. Results: a total of 177 Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scans were performed in 163 patients (median age 66 years). Of these, 117 (66%) scans detected the site of disease recurrence. Among patients with PSA 0.2-0.99 ng/ml, 23/49 (47%, p<0.0001) were positive, and 20/35 (57%, p<0.0005) were positive in the group of patients with PSA 1.00-1.99. When PSA values were further categorized into PSA <2 ng/ml and PSA >= 2 ng/ml, detection rates were 49% and 86% respectively (p <0.0001). The scans were positive in 65% of patients with Gleason score of <7, 62% with Gleason score of =7 and 68% with Gleason score >7 (p=0.745). Conclusion: there was an increase in the detection rate with an increase in the PSA. Gleason score was not a predictor of a positive Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT scan. Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT should be prioritized in patients with biochemical recurrence with PSA levels >0.2 ng/ml.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ga-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-HBED-CC Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
    Sah, Rajni Kumari
    Mayilvaganan, Sabaretnam
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 38 (04): : 407 - 407
  • [22] [68Ga]PSMA-11 for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer
    Clore, Jessica
    Scott, Peter J. H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2024,
  • [23] 68-gallium Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Detects Rare Testicular Metastasis from Prostate Cancer
    Jain, Yash
    Agrawal, Archi
    Bakshi, Ganesh
    Joshi, Amit
    Menon, Santosh
    Prakash, Gagan
    Purandare, Nilendu
    Puranik, Ameya
    Shah, Sneha
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (02): : 229 - 230
  • [24] 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matushita, Cristina S.
    Marques da Silva, Ana M.
    Schuck, Phelipi N.
    Bardisserotto, Matteo
    Piant, Diego B.
    Pereira, Jonatas L.
    Cerci, Juliano J.
    Coura-Filho, George B.
    Esteves, Fabio P.
    Amorim, Barbara J.
    Gomes, Gustavo, V
    Brito, Ana Emilia T.
    Bernardo, Wanderley M.
    Mundstock, Eduardo
    Fanti, Stefano
    Macedo, Bruna
    Roman, Diego H.
    Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin
    Hochhegger, Bruno
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2021, 47 (04): : 705 - 729
  • [25] Role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) in staging
    Kesch, Claudia
    Franiel, Tobias
    Berliner, Christoph
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Herrmann, Ken
    Hadaschik, Boris
    UROLOGIE, 2025,
  • [26] Clinical impact of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with prostate cancer with rising prostate-specific antigen after treatment with curative intent: preliminary analysis of a multidisciplinary approach
    Albisinni, Simone
    Artigas, Carlos
    Aoun, Fouad
    Biaou, Ibrahim
    Grosman, Julien
    Gil, Thierry
    Hawaux, Eric
    Limani, Ksenija
    Otte, Francois-Xavier
    Peltier, Alexandre
    Sideris, Spyridon
    Sirtaine, Nicolas
    Flamen, Patrick
    van Velthoven, Roland
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [27] Metastasis in urothelial carcinoma mimicking prostate cancer metastasis in Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography in a case of synchronous malignancy
    Gupta, Manoj
    Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
    Gupta, Gurudutt
    Gandhi, Jatin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (03): : 222 - 224
  • [28] Incremental value of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron-emission tomography/computed tomography scan for preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer
    Pallavi, U. N.
    Gogoi, Sanjay
    Thakral, Parul
    Malasani, Vindhya
    Sharma, Kanchan
    Manda, Divya
    Das, Subha Shankar
    Pant, Vineet
    Sen, Ishita
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02): : 93 - 99
  • [29] 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography for evaluation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer - our local experience
    Lam, W. W. C.
    Goh, C.
    Chua, M. L. K.
    Tan, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [30] Prospective Validation of Gallium-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer
    van Kalmthout, Ludwike W. M.
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    Lavalaye, Jules
    Meijer, Richard P.
    Kooistra, Anko
    de Klerk, John M. H.
    Braat, Arthur J. A. T.
    Kaldeway, H. Peter
    de Bruin, Peter C.
    de Keizer, Bart
    Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (03): : 537 - 544