共 50 条
Impact of in-situ bioelectric field on biogas production, membrane fouling and microbial community in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor under sulfadiazine stress
被引:0
|作者:
Huang, Haojie
[1
,2
]
Sun, Yutong
[1
,2
]
Du, Qing
[1
,2
]
Gao, Fu
[1
,2
]
Song, Zi
[1
,2
]
Wang, Zhiwen
[3
,4
]
Chang, Suyun
[5
]
Zhang, Xinbo
[1
,2
]
Guo, Wenshan
[1
,6
]
Ngo, Huu Hao
[1
,6
]
机构:
[1] Tianjin Chengjian Univ, Joint Res Ctr Protect Infrastructure Technol & En, Sch Environm & Municipal Engn, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Chengjian Univ, Tianjin Key Lab Aquat Sci & Technol, Jinjing Rd 26, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Chem Sci & Engn Tianjin, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, Frontier Sci Ctr Synthet Biol,Minist Educ,SynBio, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Chem Sci & Engn Tianjin, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, Dept Biochem Engn,Minist Educ,SynBio Res Platform, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Hydraul Res Inst, Tianjin 300000, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Technol Water & Wastewater, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词:
Anaerobic membrane bioreactor;
Microbial fuel cell;
Sulfadiazine;
Membrane fouling;
Microbial analysis;
ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE GENES;
WATER-TREATMENT;
BULK SLUDGE;
REMOVAL;
IDENTIFICATION;
CELLS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cej.2025.160225
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
The treatment of swine wastewater (SW) using an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) shows significant potential for energy recovery. However, antibiotics in SW, such as sulfadiazine (SDZ), can inhibit microbial activity, leading to reduced operational efficiency and severe membrane fouling. This study investigated the performance of an integrated microbial fuel cell (MFC)-AnMBR system under various SDZ concentrations, focusing on methane production, membrane fouling, and microbial community dynamics. Results showed the bioelectric field in the MFC-AnMBR improved COD removal by 2.8%-7.3%, enhanced methane production by 12.5%-35.5%, and reduced volatile fatty acids (VFAs) accumulation by 35.3%-56.1% under SDZ stress, compared to a conventional AnMBR (C-AnMBR). Meanwhile, the bioelectric field reduced soluble microbial products (SMP) by 6.3%-43.0%, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) by 21.9%-43.3% and extended the membrane fouling cycle by over 36 days than C-AnMBR under SDZ stress. Microbial analysis revealed that SDZ stress caused a 2.8%-7.8% reduction in methanogen populations within the MFC-AnMBR, 0.5%-3.0% higher than in the C-AnMBR due to the bioelectric field's influence. Moreover, the bioelectric field enriched p__Chloroflexi, which may help mitigate membrane fouling. In conclusion, the bioelectric field significantly enhances the overall performance of AnMBR systems under SDZ stress, improving energy recovery and membrane fouling resistance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文