Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Smart Substation Construction Projects: A Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method for Hybrid Information

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Dianqing [1 ]
Mao, Wenjie [1 ]
Ye, Kunfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Fuzhou 350116, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid information; Normal distribution interval numbers; Intuitionistic fuzzy; Cooperative game; Cosine similarity; TOPSIS; ENTROPY; SETS;
D O I
10.1007/s40815-024-01871-4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The smart substations is the core part of smart grids which affect the development of the economy and people's livelihood. This paper constructs a comprehensive benefit evaluation index system of smart substation construction project from four dimensions: intelligent benefit, economic benefit, green benefit, and safe benefit to meet the requirements of national development. The attribute value of the evaluation index is hybrid information including language variable, exact number, and normal distribution interval number, which can handle the complex sources of information. On this basis, this study constructs a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for hybrid information based on intuitionistic fuzzy theory, subjective and objective weighting method, and improved TOPSIS evaluation method. Firstly, the model uses different transformation rules to unify the hybrid information into the form of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers based on intuitionistic fuzzy theory. Secondly, based on the cooperative game model, this paper uses a weighting method which combines subjective weighting method (group eigenvalue method) and objective weighting method (intuitionistic fuzzy entropy) to determine the comprehensive weight of indicators, which can avoid the limitations of using single weighting method and makes the weights more scientific and reasonable. Thirdly, an improved TOPSIS evaluation model based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets is proposed. The Euclidean distance in traditional TOPSIS method is replaced by cosine similarity, which overcomes the shortcoming of using Euclidean distance. Finally, this paper analyzes 10 cases of smart substation construction projects and puts forward improvement strategies based on the results, the results prove that the model is feasible and it can assist decision makers in making scientific decisions based on different situations. In addition, this hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model is compared with three other models, which proves that the proposed model has good robustness and sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of technological innovation projects
    Rafael Poblano-Ojinaga, Eduardo
    Salcido-Delgado, Aldo
    Alvarado-Iniesta, Alejandro
    Noriega Morales, Salvador
    Arnoldo Rodriguez-Medina, Manuel
    DYNA, 2020, 95 (04): : 351 - 351
  • [42] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [43] Comprehensive Power Transformers Evaluation based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Vasovic, Stojan
    Dragasevic, Aleksandar
    Puzovic, Slavisa
    Puzovic, Sanja
    Paunovic, Vladan
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2021, 28 (05): : 1448 - 1455
  • [44] A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making and statistical method for scientific journal evaluation
    Li, Zongmin
    Zhao, Siwei
    2014 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES AND OPTIMIZATION (CSO), 2014, : 670 - 674
  • [45] Economy-environment-energy performance evaluation of CCHP microgrid system: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method
    Zhao, Huiru
    Li, Bingkang
    Lu, Hao
    Wang, Xuejie
    Li, Hongze
    Guo, Sen
    Xue, Wanlei
    Wang, Yuwei
    ENERGY, 2022, 240
  • [46] Evaluation of information security related risks of an organization - The application of the multi-criteria decision-making method
    Guan, BC
    Lo, CC
    Wang, P
    Hwang, JS
    37TH ANNUAL 2003 INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 168 - 175
  • [47] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [48] Evaluation and improvement of nursing undergraduates' informatics competencies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model
    Liu, Chao
    Hong, Youyou
    Hu, Wei-Ling
    Feng, Lili
    Chuang, Yen-Ching
    Wang, Bing-Long
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [49] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for hospitals' sustainability performance evaluation under fuzzy environment
    Regragui, Hajar
    Sefiani, Naoufal
    Azzouzi, Hamid
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 73 (03) : 855 - 888
  • [50] An Evaluation Model for Property-Purchasing Plans Based on a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Lin, Jun-Kun
    Lin, Hung-Lung
    Wang, William Yu Chung
    Chang, Ching-Hui
    Lin, Chin-Tsai
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (06)