The impact of fast-food energy posting on college students' food purchases

被引:0
|
作者
Racine, Elizabeth F. [1 ,2 ]
Ademu, Lilian [3 ]
Dahl, Alicia Anne [4 ]
Fandetti, Stacy M. [4 ]
Schulkind, Lisa [5 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Res Ctr El Paso, El Paso, TX 79927 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Dept Nutr, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
[3] Texas A&M AgriLife Res Ctr Paso, Inst Adv Hlth Agr, El Paso, TX USA
[4] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, Dept Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Charlotte, NC USA
[5] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Belk Coll Business, Dept Econ, Charlotte, NC USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION | 2024年 / 120卷 / 05期
关键词
nutrition policy; university; ACA; calorie posting mandate; menu energy labeling; policy implementation; fast-food restaurants; difference in difference; NUTRITION LABELS; BODY-MASS; INFORMATION; CONSUMPTION; CONSUMER; OBESITY; CHAIN; BEHAVIORS; ADULTHOOD; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.09.007
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: The Patient Protection US Affordable Care Act (ACA) energy posting mandate requires restaurant chains to disclose information on the energy content of their food items. Assessments of the effect of menu energy labeling on dietary choices have reported inconsistent findings. Objectives: This study examined the impact of menu energy labeling on food items purchased by college students after the mandate was enacted nationally. Methods: Student food sales data from purchases made at 3 fast-food restaurants during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 academic years at a university campus were used for the analysis. The total sample included 1662 students on the university meal plan; these students generated 145,295 food transactions at the restaurants over the study period. We utilized a difference-in-differences (DiD) empirical strategy, comparing changes in transaction- level energy purchases at 2 fast-food restaurants B and C (FFRB and FFRC - treatment groups) that posted energy information in the summer of 2018 with another fast-food restaurant A (FFRA - control group) that began posting energy information before the study period. Results: We observed increases in the mean energy content per transaction after implementing the menu-labeling policy. The DiD estimates found an increase of 20.6 in the mean calories of energy purchased per transaction at the treatment restaurants relative to the control restaurant. In the subgroup analyses, the DiD estimates indicated calories of energy increased: 18.7 for female students, 20.5 for male students, 23.5 for non-Hispanic Black students, 30.2 for students eligible for federal financial aid, and 19.9 for students not eligible for federal financial aid. Conclusions: The results suggest that the ACA energy menu-labeling policy led to an increase in the energy content per transaction by students at a public university. This paper highlights the need for more research to better understand the determinants of food choice among college students.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1214
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条