Comparison of the prognostic effect of taxane regimens combined with ramucirumab before nivolumab for advanced gastric cancer

BackgroundRamucirumab with either solvent-based or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is a standard second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Reportedly, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel has activated the immune system, but the efficacy of taxane-based agents before nivolumab remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic effect of ramucirumab with solvent-based or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as second-line therapy, followed by nivolumab as third-line therapy.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 115 patients with gastric cancer treated with ramucirumab in combination with solvent-based paclitaxel or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel from 2017 to 2019 at six hospitals. All patients received nivolumab as a third-line therapy. Ramucirumab + solvent-based paclitaxel and ramucirumab + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel were administered to 57 and 58 patients, respectively.ResultsThe progression-free survival of the ramucirumab + solvent-based paclitaxel group was slightly better than that of the ramucirumab + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel group but with no statistically significant difference (5.3 months vs. 4.2 months). Contrary, the overall survival of the ramucirumab + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel group was slightly better than the ramucirumab + solvent-based paclitaxel group but with no statistically significant difference (19.0 months vs. 12.5 months). The multivariate analysis of progression-free survival revealed that ramucirumab + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis, whereas ramucirumab + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel was an independent factor for good overall survival.ConclusionsRamucirumab + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel may prolong overall survival when administered before nivolumab, despite its limited effect on progression-free survival.