Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With 3 Vessel Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Fialka, Nicholas [1 ]
EL-Andari, Ryaan [1 ,3 ]
Kang, Jimmy [1 ]
Hong, Yongzhe [1 ]
Mcalister, Finlay A. [2 ]
Nagendran, Jayan [1 ]
Nagendran, Jeevan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Surg, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
关键词
coronary artery bypass grafting; percutaneous coronary intervention; coronary artery disease; coronary revascularization; chronic kidney disease; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; POOLED ANALYSIS; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; SYNTAX; ASSOCIATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) commonly co-exist. Superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been identified in patients with 3 vessel CAD (TVD) and CKD but have been limited to mid-term follow-up. Herein, we analyzed the long-term outcomes of patients with TVD and CKD undergoing surgical versus percutaneous revascularization. 1,599 patients with CKD and TVD without STEMI or previous revascularization underwent coronary angiography between 2009 and 2018. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of readmission for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat revascularization, and overall rehospitalization. 453 patients were included in the final analysis (PCI 373; CABG 80; median followup 9.3 years). All results are presented as CABG versus PCI. The rate of all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up (14.1 years) was significantly lower in patients who underwent CABG (68.9% vs 83.1%, p = 0.039, adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.98). Readmission rates for MI (10.2% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.009, aHR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.77) and repeat revascularization (3.1% vs. 24.4%, p <0.001, aHR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.34) were also lower after CABG than after PCI. No significant difference was observed in the rates of readmission for stroke or all causes. In conclusion, in this retrospective single-center study, we confirmed that the previously described advantages of CABG over PCI in patients with CKD and TVD persist with extended long-term follow-up. CABG should be considered the gold standard approach to revascularization in this patient population.<br /> (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 14
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coronary revascularization in octogenarians, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting
    Saito, N
    Yokomatsu, T
    Nobuyoshi, M
    Kimura, T
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 414 - 414
  • [22] Coronary Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Mulukutla, Suresh R.
    Gleason, Thomas G.
    Sharbaugh, Michael
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    Marroquin, Oscar C.
    Thoma, Floyd
    Smith, Conrad
    Toma, Catalin
    Lee, Joon S.
    Kilic, Arman
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 108 (02): : 474 - 480
  • [23] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting as primary revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome
    Hochholzer, Willibald
    Buettner, Heinz Joachim
    Trenk, Dietmar
    Breidthardt, Tobias
    Noveanu, Markus
    Laule, Kirsten
    Christ, Michael
    Schindler, Christian
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Mueller, Christian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 102 (02): : 173 - 179
  • [24] PATIENTS' PREFERENCES FOR CORONARY BYPASS GRAFTING OR STAGED PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN MULTI-VESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
    Ohlow, M. -A.
    Farah, A.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 140 : 119 - 119
  • [25] Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Compared with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Disease
    Freeman, Melanie
    Farouque, H. M. Omar
    Smith, Julian A.
    Dinh, Diem
    Andrianopoulos, Nick
    Reid, Christopher M.
    Ajani, Andrew E.
    Duffy, Stephen J.
    Buxton, Brian F.
    Clark, David J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (6A): : 9D - 9D
  • [26] Patients' preferences for coronary bypass grafting or staged percutaneous coronary intervention in multi-vessel coronary artery disease
    Ohlow, Marc-Alexander
    Farah, Ahmed
    Kuntze, Thomas
    Lauer, Bernward
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 72 (04)
  • [27] Quick Evidence Synopsis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
    Sands-Lincoln, Megan
    Goldmann, David R.
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2016, 34 (04) : 615 - 621
  • [28] AN OUTCOME COMPARISON OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VERSUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING IN ELDERLY PATIENT WITH MULTI-VESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
    Alkhawam, Hassan
    Muskula, Preetham Reddy
    Ghrair, Fadi
    Windish, Stephanie
    Ampadu, James
    Kichura, Andrew
    Lieber, Joseph
    Lim, Michael
    Helmy, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 43 - 43
  • [29] Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Naqvi, Syed Yaseen
    Klein, Jordan
    Saha, Tisa
    McCormick, Daniel J.
    Goldberg, Sheldon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (04): : 520 - 527
  • [30] CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN WOMEN WITH MULTI VESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
    Alkhawam, Hassan
    Muskula, Preetham Reddy
    Abo-Salem, Elsayed
    Al-Sadawi, Mohammed
    Ampadu, James
    Salloum, Mohammad
    Lieber, Joseph J.
    Lim, Michael
    Helmy, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 42 - 42