Does trading mechanism shape cross-market integration? Evidence from stocks and corporate bonds on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange

被引:0
|
作者
Hadad, Elroi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shamoon Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Corporate bonds; Stocks; Cross-market integration; Trading mechanism; Conditional volatility; G12; G14; G15; RETAIL INVESTOR SENTIMENT; CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY; YIELD SPREADS; TIME-SERIES; LIQUIDITY; SECTION; RETURN; RISK; VOLATILITY; CONTAGION;
D O I
10.1108/JEFAS-11-2023-0262
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study investigates the influence of trading mechanisms on cross-market integration between stocks and corporate bonds on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) during the COVID-19 crisis. Unlike the worldwide practice of trading corporate bonds on an over-the-counter (OTC) market, TASE uses a limit-order-book (LOB) for both stocks and bonds, potentially creating unique volatility dynamics through direct information spillover. We analyze the volatility dynamics and spillover effects between TASE's stock and corporate bond markets.Design/methodology/approachWe employ an exponential general autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (EGARCH)(1,1) model to assess the impact of stock market fear, measured by implied volatility, on Tel-Bond 20 Index returns and volatility. A bivariate diagonal Baba-Engle-Kraft-Kroner (BEKK) model is also applied to capture time-series integration and cross-volatility spillovers between the TA-35 Index (stocks) and the Tel-Bond 20 Index (corporate bonds), especially during financial stress.FindingsThe EGARCH model reveals a significant contagion effect, with increased stock market fear lowering corporate bond returns and increasing bond volatility. It also indicates a leverage effect, where negative shocks disproportionately amplify bond volatility. Diagonal BEKK results confirm strong cross-market volatility persistence, especially during crises, highlighting substantial financial contagion between stocks and bonds in TASE. While TASE's market design improves the overall market quality, these findings underscore the LOB trading mechanism in facilitating financial contagion and systemic risk.Practical implicationsThe LOB trading in TASE facilitates direct information flow, intensifying volatility spillover and cross-market integration, with the degree of integration fluctuating based on market conditions. Investors and managers should consider alternative hedging strategies during volatile periods, as stock market sentiment significantly impacts bond stability. Regulators should assess how trading mechanisms affect market integration and risk, especially during periods of distress.Originality/valueThis study offers new insights into how trading mechanisms influence cross-market dynamics, contributing to the literature on market design and financial contagion.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How does China's crude oil futures affect the crude oil prices at home and abroad? Evidence from the cross-market exchange rate spillovers
    Sun, Chuanwang
    Peng, Yiqi
    Zhan, Yanhong
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 88 : 204 - 222
  • [42] Local Institutional Investors and Corporate Monitoring: Evidence from Cross-Listed Korean Stocks in the US Market
    Choi, Changhwan
    Chung, Chune Young
    Song, Jun Myung
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (03) : 456 - 477
  • [43] Does trade size restriction affect trading behavior? Evidence from Indian single stock futures market
    Banerjee, Anirban
    Banerjee, Ashok
    JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2020, 40 (03) : 355 - 373
  • [44] Does the National Carbon Emissions Trading Market Promote Corporate Environmental Protection Investment? Evidence from China
    Yang, Xiao
    Jia, Wen
    Wang, Kedan
    Peng, Geng
    Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [45] The Effects of Index Futures Trading Volume on Spot Market Volatility in a Frontier Market: Evidence from Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange
    Truong, Loc Dong
    Friday, H. Swint
    Nguyen, Anh Thi Kim
    RISKS, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [46] Index Future Trading and Spot Market Volatility in Frontier Markets: Evidence from Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange
    Loc Dong Truong
    Anh Thi Kim Nguyen
    Dut Van Vo
    Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 2021, 28 : 353 - 366
  • [47] The impact of algorithmic trading on market quality: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (vol 51, pg 157, 2022)
    Courdent, Aureli
    McClelland, David
    INVESTMENT ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2022, 51 (04) : 319 - 319
  • [48] Index Future Trading and Spot Market Volatility in Frontier Markets: Evidence from Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange
    Truong, Loc Dong
    Nguyen, Anh Thi Kim
    Vo, Dut Van
    ASIA-PACIFIC FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2021, 28 (03) : 353 - 366
  • [49] Does financial transparency substitute corporate governance to improve stock liquidity? Evidence from emerging market of Pakistan
    Ali, Shuaib
    Wu Zhongxin
    Ali, Zahid
    Usman, Muhammad
    Yu Zhuoping
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [50] Does interactive disclosure discourage corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from Chinese stock exchange interactive platforms
    Shen Jiang
    Lizheng Wang
    Journal of Data, Information and Management, 2023, 5 (4): : 227 - 242