Analysis of stress intensity factor oscillations in 3D cracks using domain integrals and the extended finite element method

被引:0
|
作者
Gonzalez-Albuixech, Vicente F. [1 ]
Giner, Eugenio [2 ]
Gravouil, Anthony [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept FAIAN, ETSI Aeronaut & Espacio, Pza Cardenal Cisneros 3, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Mech Engn & Biomech I2MB, Dept Mech Engn & Mat, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[3] INSA Lyon, CNRS, LaMCoS, UMR5259, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
XFEM; SIF; Oscillations of SIF solution; Domain integrals; LEVEL SETS; FACTOR EXTRACTION; PART II; X-FEM; GROWTH; FRONT; COMPUTATION; FORMULATION; ROBUSTNESS; ENRICHMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2025.117739
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Fracture-related failure of structural integrity can be evaluated using stress intensity factors (SIFs), and complex fractured geometries can be modeled using the extended finite element method (XFEM). Typically, domain integrals - especially J-integrals and interaction integrals - are used to compute SIFs. Although these integrals produce accurate estimates with the finite element method, they exhibit oscillations in the finite element support mesh when using XFEM due to their sensitivity to various topological relationships between the enrichment zone, domain definition and mesh. These oscillations can jeopardize accuracy, stability, and robustness of XFEM, influencing the convergence rate of SIFs. The domain integration solution has already undergone several changes to reduce these impacts, but no comparison or consideration of topological influence has been made. Here, we study some of the elements that lead to the unwanted behavior observed in various domain integration definitions, which incorporate corrections for curved and nonplanar cracks in examples with relatively coarse meshes. Consequently, various methodological limitations are discussed along with recommendations and suggestions.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MFL analysis by 3D finite element method
    Huang, ZY
    Que, PW
    Chen, L
    Jin, T
    ISTM/2005: 6th International Symposium on Test and Measurement, Vols 1-9, Conference Proceedings, 2005, : 5352 - 5355
  • [33] Analysis of the finite element calculation for stress intensity factor
    Wu, YM
    Wang, YQ
    Shi, YJ
    Wang, XZ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR YOUNG EXPERTS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2002, : 186 - 191
  • [35] Crack growth simulation of arbitrarily shaped 3D cracks using finite element alternating method
    Kim, TS
    Park, SY
    Park, JH
    ADVANCES IN FRACTURE AND STRENGTH, PTS 1- 4, 2005, 297-300 : 1056 - 1061
  • [36] Determination of stress intensity factor with direct stress approach using finite element analysis
    Ji, X.
    Zhu, F.
    He, P. F.
    ACTA MECHANICA SINICA, 2017, 33 (05) : 879 - 885
  • [37] Determination of stress intensity factor with direct stress approach using finite element analysis
    X. Ji
    F. Zhu
    P. F. He
    Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2017, 33 : 879 - 885
  • [38] Determination of stress intensity factor with direct stress approach using finite element analysis
    X.Ji
    F.Zhu
    P.F.He
    Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2017, (05) : 879 - 885
  • [39] Stress intensity factors for corner cracks at a hole by a 3-D weight function method with stresses from the finite element method
    Univ of South Carolina, Columbia, United States
    Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, 9 (1255-1267):
  • [40] Stress intensity factors for corner cracks at a hole by a 3-D weight function method with stresses from the finite element method
    Zhao, W
    Newman, JC
    Sutton, MA
    Wu, XR
    Shivakumar, KN
    FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1997, 20 (09) : 1255 - 1267