Fournier's Gangrene Mortality Index (FGMI): A New Scoring System for Predicting Fournier's Gangrene Mortality

被引:0
|
作者
Yonder, Huseyin [1 ]
Celik, Mehmet [2 ]
Berhuni, Mehmet Sait [1 ]
Genc, Ahmed Cihad [3 ]
Elkan, Hasan [1 ]
Tatli, Faik [1 ]
Ozgonul, Abdullah [1 ]
Ciftci, Felat [4 ]
Erkmen, Firat [5 ]
Karabay, Oguz [6 ]
Uzunkoy, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Harran Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, TR-63300 Sanliurfa, Turkiye
[2] Harran Univ, Fac Med, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, TR-63300 Sanliurfa, Turkiye
[3] Sakarya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Internal Med, TR-54290 Sakarya, Turkiye
[4] Sanliurfa Training & Res Hosp, Clin Gen Surg, TR-63250 Sanliurfa, Turkiye
[5] Sanliurfa Balikligol State Hosp, Clin Gen Surg, TR-63050 Sanliurfa, Turkiye
[6] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, TR-54290 Sakarya, Turkiye
关键词
Fournier's gangrene; LRINEC; Fournier's gangrene mortality index; predictive; SEVERITY INDEX; NECROTIZING FASCIITIS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; LYMPHOCYTE RATIO; RISK-FACTORS; NEUTROPHIL; EXPERIENCE; PLATELET; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14232732
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Fournier's gangrene is an aggressive, rapidly progressing, and life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis of the perineal and genital regions. Various scoring systems have been developed for predicting survival and prognosis in Fournier's gangrene. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the newly developed Fournier's gangrene mortality index (FGMI) in predicting mortality associated with Fournier's gangrene. Methods: The study included patients over the age of 18 years who were followed-up with a diagnosis of Fournier's gangrene in the general surgery clinics of three different hospitals in & Scedil;anl & imath;urfa province between 2014 and 2024. The patients included in this study were divided into two groups: deceased (n = 20) and surviving (n = 149). In FGMI, the parameters used were age, creatinine level, albumin level, lymphocyte percentage, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Based on the total score and risk assessment, <5 points were categorized as low-to-moderate mortality risk and >= 5 points as high mortality risk. Results: A total of 169 patients with a diagnosis of Fournier's gangrene were included in the study; 87 were men (51.48%). The median age of all patients was 53 (40-63) years; 20 patients (11.8%) died. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score did not show a statistically significant difference between the deceased and surviving groups (p = 0.5). Compared to the survivors, the deceased had higher neutrophil counts, neutrophil percentages, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratios, whereas lymphocyte counts, lymphocyte percentages, eosinophil counts, eosinophil percentages, monocyte counts, and monocyte percentages were lower, and these differences were statistically significant. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the ROC-area under the curve for predicting mortality based on an FGMI score of >= 5 was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95) with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 70% (p < 0.001). Univariate risk analysis was performed, and the odds ratio revealed that mortality risk in patients followed-up for Fournier's gangrene with a FGMI score of >= 5 was 20 times higher (4.48-90.91) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results reveal that the FGMI score is a scoring system that can predict mortality at the initial clinical presentation of patients with Fournier's gangrene. Another important finding of the present study is that the LRINEC score was not sufficiently effective in predicting mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fournier's gangrene
    Cheung, Phoebe S. Y.
    Graham, Colin A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 2 : 257 - 257
  • [42] Fournier's gangrene
    Tevita 'Aho
    Alessandra Canal
    David E Neal
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2006, 3 : 54 - 57
  • [43] Fournier's gangrene
    Bouilland, Olivier
    Barbe, Olivier
    Le Goudeveze, Sebastien
    Gadsaud, Guylene
    Cadot, Patrick
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2013, 42 (02): : 245 - 247
  • [44] Predicting Mortality in Fournier Gangrene and Validating the Fournier Gangrene Severity Index: Our Experience with 50 Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in India
    Arora, Amandeep
    Rege, Sameer
    Surpam, Shrinivas
    Gothwal, Kalyansing
    Narwade, Anurag
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 102 (03) : 311 - 318
  • [45] Fournier's gangrene: Experience with 25 patients and use of Fournier's gangrene severity index score
    Yeniyol, CO
    Suelozgen, T
    Arslan, M
    Ayder, AR
    UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (02) : 218 - 222
  • [46] Scoring Systems for the Prediction of Mortality in Patient with Fournier’s Gangrene: an Analysis of 60 Patients
    Mehmet Arif Usta
    Mehmet Ulusahin
    Serkan Tayar
    Arif Burak Cekic
    Ilke Onur Kazaz
    Ali Guner
    Serdar Turkyilmaz
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2021, 83 : 696 - 702
  • [47] Scoring Systems for the Prediction of Mortality in Patient with Fournier's Gangrene: an Analysis of 60 Patients
    Usta, Mehmet Arif
    Ulusahin, Mehmet
    Tayar, Serkan
    Cekic, Arif Burak
    Kazaz, Ilke Onur
    Guner, Ali
    Turkyilmaz, Serdar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 83 (03) : 696 - 702
  • [48] Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and Fournier gangrene severity index are not prognostic factors of mortality in fournier gangrene patients
    Raizandha, Muhammad Achdiar
    Hidayatullah, Furqan
    Kloping, Yudhistira Pradnyan
    Rizaldi, Fikri
    UNIVERSA MEDICINA, 2022, 41 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [49] Risk factors for mortality in Fournier's gangrene of anorectal origin
    Tosun, Yasin
    Akinci, Ozan
    Kucuk, Hasan Fehmi
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 28 (08): : 1128 - 1133
  • [50] Location of residence and mortality for patients diagnosed with Fournier's gangrene
    Wong, Rachel
    Blachman-Braun, Ruben
    Mann, Uday
    Eng, Amanda
    Lother, Sylvain
    Patel, Premal
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (05): : E267 - E271