Phenotyping of Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Genotypes for Morphological, Yield and Nutritional Quality Traits

被引:0
|
作者
Naim, Jannatul [1 ]
Khatun, Sheikh Mahfuja [1 ]
Das, Biswajit [1 ]
Mim, Mumtarin Haque [1 ,2 ]
Akter, Sadia [1 ]
Shakil, Masudur Reza [3 ]
Shozib, Habibul Bari [4 ]
Toderich, Kristina [5 ]
Hossain, Mohammad Anwar [1 ]
机构
[1] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Dept Genet & Plant Breeding, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Plant Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Dept Hort, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
[4] Bangladesh Rice Res Inst, Grain Qual & Nutr Div, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh
[5] Mie Univ, Grad Sch Bioresources, 1577 Kurimamachiya, Tsu 5148507, Japan
关键词
Quinoa; adaptability; agronomic traits; genetic parameters; heritability; proximate composition; GENETIC-VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.32604/phyton.2024.058786
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is regarded as a superfood due to its exceptionally high nutritional value and ability to withstand stress. Six quinoa genotypes (viz., SAU Quinoa-1, Regalona, GPBQ-1, GPBQ-2, GPBQ-3, and GPBQ-4) were characterized for morphological, yield, and nutritional quality attributes while being grown under the agro-climatic conditions of Bangladesh. The fi eld experiment was carried out in the winter season (November 2022-March 2023) at the Agronomy Field Laboratory of the Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Data on various qualitative and quantitative traits related to growth and yield-attributes were recorded. A large variability was observed among the genotypes for growth habit, stem color, panicle shape, and panicle color at maturity. The whitish color of the seed was found in GPBQ-3 which indicates less saponin content as confirmed by saponin test. Yield attributing quantitative traits (viz., days to fi rst fl owering, days to maturity, plant height, stem diameter, panicle weight, 1000-seed weight, yield plant-1, above-ground biomass, and harvest index) also showed significant variation among the genotypes studied. Genotypes SAU Quinoa-1 and GPBQ-2 were identified as early maturing genotypes. The higher yield plant-1 was recorded in GPBQ-1 and GPBQ-3 genotypes. The phenotypic coefficient of variation for the majority of the traits evaluated was slightly higher than the corresponding genotypic coeffi- cient of variation. For stem diameter, panicle weight, 1000-seed weight, yields plant-1, and above-ground biomass, high heritability and high genetic advancement were seen as percentages of the mean. Yield plant-1 showed significant positive correlation with days to fi rst fl owering, days to maturity, plant height, stem diameter, panicle weight, and above-ground biomass (0.568*, 0.812***, 0.744***, 0.895***, 0.993***, and 0.985***, respectively). The fi rst two components accounted for 85.5% of the overall variation among the genotypes, according to principal component analysis. Significant variability was also found for seed mineral contents (viz., calcium, copper, iron, potassium, magnesium, manganese, and zinc) in the studied genotypes. The SAU Quinoa-1 genotype contained the highest amount of calcium and zinc, whereas, the highest amount of potassium was recorded in the GPBQ-1 genotype. We found a non-significant variability in carbohydrate, protein, fat, fi ber, and vitamins (viz., thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, and folic acid) contents in the studied genotypes. Considering all the yield and nutritional quality traits under study, the genotypes GPBQ-1, GPBQ-3, and GPBQ-4 were selected for future variety development program.
引用
收藏
页码:3443 / 3463
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unraveling the Influence of Water and Nitrogen Management on Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Agronomic and Yield Traits
    AbdElgalil, Mostafa AbdElaal Sayed
    Hefzy, Mohamed
    Sas-Paszt, Lidia
    Ali, Hayssam M.
    Lamlom, Sobhi F.
    Abdelghany, Ahmed M.
    WATER, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [22] Nutritional, therapeutic, and technological perspectives of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A review
    Brito, Isabelle de Lima
    Chantelle, Lais
    Magnani, Marciane
    Cordeiro, Angela Maria Tribuzy de Magalhaes
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION, 2022, 46 (05)
  • [23] Ecdysteroids of Quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Zhu, N
    Kikuzaki, H
    Vastano, BC
    Nakatani, N
    Karwe, MV
    Rosen, RT
    Ho, CT
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2001, 49 (05) : 2576 - 2578
  • [24] The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, SE
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (1-2) : 167 - 177
  • [25] FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF QUINOA (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) GENOTYPES HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT CUTTING STAGES UNDER MEDITERRANEAN CONDITIONS
    Yilmaz, Saban
    Ertekin, Ibrahim
    Atis, Ibrahim
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2021, 26 (02) : 202 - 209
  • [26] Glycaemic properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.).
    Zevallos, V.
    Grimble, G.
    Herencia, L. I.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2006, 65 : 60A - 60A
  • [27] Effect of Soil Water Availability on Physiological Parameters, Yield, and Seed Quality in Four Quinoa Genotypes (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Valdivia-Cea, Walter
    Bustamante, Luis
    Jara, Jorge
    Fischer, Susana
    Holzapfel, Eduardo
    Wilckens, Rosemarie
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [28] Extraction and Quantification of Saponins in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Genotypes from Colombia
    Mora-Ocacion, Mary S.
    Morillo-Coronado, Ana Cruz
    Manjarres-Hernandez, Elsa Helena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [29] Evaluation of Genotype x Environment Interactions in Quinoa Genotypes (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Laki, Ebrahim Souri
    Rabiei, Babak
    Jokarfard, Vahid
    Shahbazi Miyangaskari, Mahboubeh
    Marashi, Hassan
    Boerner, Andreas
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (05):
  • [30] Evaluation of agro-morphological traits of quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under different environmental conditions
    Czekus, Borisz
    Stojsin, Mirela Matkovic
    Jovanovic, Zorica
    Zecevic, Veselinka
    Radovic, Ivana
    Marjanovic, Milena
    Cvikic, Dejan
    Savic, Sladana
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2025, 85 (01): : 3 - 14