Enhanced fluoride removal by modified water hyacinth: response surface methodology and machine learning approach

被引:0
|
作者
Patil, Jagadish H. [1 ]
Kusanur, Raviraj [2 ]
Hiremath, Poornima G. [3 ]
Gadagi, Amith H. [4 ]
Hegde, Prasad G. [5 ]
Deshannavar, Umesh B. [6 ]
机构
[1] RV Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] RV Coll Engn, Dept Chem, Bangalore, India
[3] Siddaganga Inst Technol Tumkur, Dept Chem Engn, Tumkur, Karnataka, India
[4] KLE Dr MS Sheshgiri Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
[5] KLE Dr MS Sheshgiri Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
[6] Warana Univ, Tatyasaheb Kore Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Warananagar, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Water hyacinth; Central composite design; Machine learning; Adsorption; Fluoride removal; ACTIVATED CARBON; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; ADSORPTION; GROUNDWATER; WASTE; OPTIMIZATION; EQUILIBRIUM; KINETICS; SORPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-025-06543-3
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study investigates the potential of surface-modified water hyacinth for efficient fluoride removal from aqueous solutions. Sodium dodecyl sulfate treatment was employed to modify the water hyacinth powder, leading to enhanced adsorption capacity. A central composite design (CCD) within the response surface methodology (RSM) framework was employed to optimize the key process variables impacting fluoride removal: adsorbent dosage, contact time, initial fluoride concentration, and solution pH. The optimal conditions for fluoride removal were determined to be a pH of 4, an adsorbent dosage of 1.25 g/L, and a contact time of 180 min. Under these parameters, a fluoride removal efficiency of 95.43% was achieved for an initial fluoride concentration of 32 ppm. Adsorption isotherms and kinetics were investigated to understand the underlying mechanisms. The adsorption kinetics and equilibrium data were best fitted by three models: the Freundlich isotherm (for equilibrium), pseudo-second-order kinetics (for reaction rate), and intraparticle diffusion (for mass transfer mechanisms). Further characterization through techniques like FTIR, SEM, and EDX provided insights into the changes in the water hyacinth properties after fluoride adsorption, solidifying the effectiveness of the modification. The extreme gradient boosting machine learning technique was implemented to enhance prediction accuracy, resulting in exceptional prediction accuracy for fluoride removal percentages, with maximum errors of 0.84% and 0.95% for training and testing datasets, respectively. Integrating computational methods helps in developing a deep understanding of environmental remediation technologies. This research envisages the potential of modified water hyacinth, an eco-friendly material with defluoridation efficiency, as a sustainable and viable solution for water defluoridation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by adsorption on hydroxyapatite (HAp) using response surface methodology
    Mourabet, M.
    El Rhilassi, A.
    El Boujaady, H.
    Bennani-Ziatni, M.
    El Hamri, R.
    Taitai, A.
    JOURNAL OF SAUDI CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 19 (06) : 603 - 615
  • [22] A chemometric approach based on response surface methodology for optimization of antibiotic and organic dyes removal from water samples
    Hsu, Chou-Yi
    Ali, Eyhab
    Al-Saedi, Haider Falih Shamikh
    Mohammed, Amjed Qasim
    Mustafa, Nadia Khalid
    Talib, Maysm Barzan
    Radi, Usama Kadem
    Ramadan, Montather F.
    Ami, Ahmed Ali
    Al-Shuwaili, Saeb Jasim
    Alawadi, Ahmed
    Alsalamy, Ali
    Baharinikoo, Leila
    BMC CHEMISTRY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [23] A chemometric approach based on response surface methodology for optimization of antibiotic and organic dyes removal from water samples
    Chou-Yi Hsu
    Eyhab Ali
    Haider Falih Shamikh Al-Saedi
    Amjed Qasim Mohammed
    Nadia Khalid Mustafa
    Maysm Barzan Talib
    Usama Kadem Radi
    Montather F. Ramadan
    Ahmed Ali Ami
    Saeb Jasim Al-Shuwaili
    Ahmed Alawadi
    Ali Alsalamy
    Leila Baharinikoo
    BMC Chemistry, 18
  • [24] Efficient phosphate removal from water using ductile cast iron waste: a response surface methodology approach
    Roushdy, Mai Hassan
    Elkhashab, Nada Amr
    Osman, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Ali, Dalia Amer
    FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY, 2024, 12
  • [25] Efficient Removal of Chromium and Lead from Water Solutions Using Forward Osmosis: A Response Surface Methodology Approach
    Hashemi, Marjan
    Naghdali, Zohreh
    Eslami, Akbar
    Jamali, Hamzeh Ali
    WATER CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 10 (01)
  • [26] Utilization of response surface methodology and machine learning for predicting and optimizing mixing and compaction temperatures of bio-modified asphalt
    Al-Sabaeei, Abdulnaser M.
    Alhussian, Hitham
    Abdulkadir, Said Jadid
    Giustozzi, Filippo
    Napiah, Madzlan
    Jagadeesh, Ajayshankar
    Sutanto, Muslich
    Memon, Abdul Muhaimin
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2023, 18
  • [27] Optimization of Combustion Performance of Bioethanol (Water Hyacinth) Diesel Blends on Diesel Engine Using Response Surface Methodology
    Choudhary, Akhilesh Kumar
    Chelladurai, H.
    Kannan, C.
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 40 (12) : 3675 - 3695
  • [28] Optimization of Combustion Performance of Bioethanol (Water Hyacinth) Diesel Blends on Diesel Engine Using Response Surface Methodology
    Akhilesh Kumar Choudhary
    H. Chelladurai
    C. Kannan
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2015, 40 : 3675 - 3695
  • [29] Removal of Nitroaniline From Water/Ethanol by Electrocoagulation Using Response Surface Methodology
    Tamne, Guy Bertrand
    Nanseu-Njiki, Charles Peguy
    Bodoki, Ede
    Sandulescu, Robert
    Oprean, Radu
    Ngameni, Emmanuel
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2016, 44 (04) : 430 - 437
  • [30] Optimization of boron removal from water by electrodialysis using response surface methodology
    Guesmi, Fatma
    Louati, Islem
    Hannachi, Chiraz
    Hamrouni, Bechir
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 81 (02) : 293 - 300