Physics-based parameters selection and machine learning driven prediction of pool boiling bubble departure diameter

被引:0
|
作者
Sajjad, Uzair [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Yu-Hao [1 ]
Yaqoob, Haseeb [3 ]
Sengupta, Akash [4 ]
Ali, Hafiz Muhammad [3 ,5 ]
Hamid, Khalid [6 ]
Yan, Wei-Mon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Energy & Refrigerating Air Conditioning Engn, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Res Ctr Energy Conservat New Generat Residential C, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Mech Engn Dept, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[4] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 1001 Univ Rd, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[5] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Sustainable Energy Syst, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Neural network; Bubble dynamics; Correlations; Boiling heat transfer; Energy Efficiency; HEAT-TRANSFER; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100795
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
To predict the bubble departure diameter in pool boiling heat transfer, this study proposes a deep-learning neural network based on physical input parameters from the existing bubble departure diameter predicting correlations and Pearson correlation for a variety of working fluids, engineered surfaces, and materials subjected to different pool boiling testing conditions. This work analyzes nearly 5,000 data points (from the literature) of bubble departure diameters ranging from 0.2-28.7 mm using neural network by incorporating the impactful input parameters such as saturation temperature, pressure, contact angle, surface roughness, surface tension, liquid density, vapor density, wall superheat, and heat flux, and other thermophysical properties, predicting their impact on the bubble departure diameter, and also uses them for training neural networks. The best neural network designated as Case-4, selected on the basis of coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean-square error (MSE) was used to understand the degree of influence of each input parameter and it was found that surface inclination (theta) and heat flux (Q) have the highest impact on the model. A comparison was also done to the existing correlations and it was found that neural networks have much better efficiency and accuracy than the empirical correlations for the considered data range and thus can be an essential tool to predict the bubble diameter.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Physics-based statistical learning approach to mesoscopic model selection
    Taverniers, Soren
    Haut, Terry S.
    Barros, Kipton
    Alexander, Francis J.
    Lookman, Turab
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2015, 92 (05):
  • [42] Improved departure from nucleate boiling prediction in rod bundles using a physics-informed machine learning-aided framework
    Zhao, Xingang
    Salko, Robert K.
    Shirvan, Koroush
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2021, 374
  • [43] Machine learning symbolic equations for diffusion with physics-based descriptions
    Papastamatiou, Konstantinos
    Sofos, Filippos
    Karakasidis, Theodoros E.
    AIP ADVANCES, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [44] Physics-based machine learning for subcellular segmentation in living cells
    Sekh, Arif Ahmed
    Opstad, Ida S.
    Godtliebsen, Gustav
    Birgisdottir, Asa Birna
    Ahluwalia, Balpreet Singh
    Agarwal, Krishna
    Prasad, Dilip K.
    NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (12) : 1071 - 1080
  • [45] Physics-based representations for machine learning properties of chemical reactions
    van Gerwen, Puck
    Fabrizio, Alberto
    Wodrich, Matthew D.
    Corminboeuf, Clemence
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [46] Quantification of tumorsphere migration with a physics-based machine learning method
    Vong, Chun Kiet
    Wang, Alan
    Dragunow, Mike
    Park, Thomas I. -H.
    Shim, Vickie
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2023, 103 (06) : 518 - 527
  • [47] Physics-based machine learning for subcellular segmentation in living cells
    Arif Ahmed Sekh
    Ida S. Opstad
    Gustav Godtliebsen
    Åsa Birna Birgisdottir
    Balpreet Singh Ahluwalia
    Krishna Agarwal
    Dilip K. Prasad
    Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3 : 1071 - 1080
  • [48] Data-driven modeling and optimization in fluid dynamics: From physics-based to machine learning approaches
    Bergmann, Michel
    Cordier, Laurent
    Iliescu, Traian
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2022, 10
  • [49] Combining physics-based and data-driven models: advancing the frontiers of research with scientific machine learning
    Quarteroni, Alfio
    Gervasio, Paola
    Regazzoni, Francesco
    MATHEMATICAL MODELS & METHODS IN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2025,
  • [50] Hybrid RGNet: A physics-based model enhanced by machine learning for history matching, characterization and future prediction
    Guo, Zhenyu
    Sankaran, Sathish
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 246