Donor site morbidity of upper extremity flaps in head and neck reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Hanna, Craig [1 ]
Danis III, David [1 ]
Kimia, Rotem [1 ]
Merkouris, Heather [2 ]
Steinwald, Peter [1 ]
O'Leary, Miriam [1 ]
Tracy, Jeremiah [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Dr Elie E Rebeiz Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 860 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Donor site morbidity; Free flap; Pedicled flap; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; MAJOR HEAD; COMPLICATIONS; CANCER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104548
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: This retrospective cohort study aims to compare donor site morbidity of three commonly used upper extremity flaps used in head and neck reconstructive surgery: scapular tip free flap (STFF), radial forearm free flap (RFFF), and pectoralis major pedicled flap (PMPF). Methods: The billing database of an urban, academic, tertiary otolaryngology practice was queried to identify patients who underwent STFF, RFFF, and PMPF from 2020 to 2023. The primary outcome was identification of donor site pain and need for physical therapy (PT) referral after undergoing reconstruction. Results: Seventy-three patients (44M:29F) underwent surgery that utilized upper extremity free or pedicled flaps. Patients undergoing free tissue transfer (FTT) were 5.455 times more likely to require PT referral compared to patients undergoing pedicled tissue transfer (PTT). Patients undergoing FTT were 3.417 times more likely to report donor site pain compared to patients undergoing PTT. There were no differences in post-operative PT referrals or post-operative donor site pain when comparing STFF or RFFF groups. Importantly, RFFF were primarily all fasciocutaneous flaps (33/35). Conclusions: These findings have important implications when counselling patients regarding reconstructive options for complex head and neck surgery defects.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MICROVASCULAR FLAPS IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    BHATHENA, HM
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 1990, 12 (06): : 529 - 529
  • [22] Novel flaps for head and neck reconstruction
    Ahmad Q.G.
    Shankhdhar V.K.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 1 (2) : 120 - 124
  • [24] REGIONAL FLAPS IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    HAMAKER, RC
    SINGER, MI
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1982, 15 (01) : 94 - 110
  • [25] Local Flaps for Reconstruction in the Head and Neck
    Wo, Luccie M.
    Singh, Devinder
    Thaller, Seth R.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (03) : 832 - 835
  • [26] HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION WITH MYOCUTANEOUS FLAPS
    ECONOMIDES, NG
    REEDER, RC
    FERRELL, TH
    HUGHES, AH
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 79 (02) : 47 - 47
  • [27] Rational selection of flaps from the abdomen in breast reconstruction to reduce donor site morbidity
    Arnez, ZM
    Khan, U
    Pogorelec, D
    Planinsek, F
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 52 (05): : 351 - 354
  • [28] Fillet flaps as a possibility for defect reconstruction of the hand.: Reconstruction without additional donor site morbidity
    Noack, N
    Hartmann, B
    Germann, G
    Küntscher, MV
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2005, 108 (04): : 293 - 298
  • [29] FREE FLAPS VERSUS MYOCUTANEOUS FLAPS IN RECONSTRUCTION OF THE HEAD AND NECK
    PANJE, WR
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1982, 15 (01) : 111 - 121
  • [30] Social determinants of health and donor site morbidity in head and neck reconstructive limbs
    Elbert, Emma
    Schmidt, Kelly L.
    Doctor, Elena
    Tassone, Patrick
    Galloway, Tabitha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 46 (02)