Fishing for data: AI approaches to advance recreational fisheries monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Baker, Lachlan R. [1 ]
Knott, Nathan A. [2 ]
Gorkin Iii, Robert [3 ,4 ]
Aubin, Sam [3 ]
Brown, Culum [5 ]
Peters, Katharina J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Earth Atmospher & Life Sci, Marine Vertebrate Ecol Lab, Environm Futures, Wollongong, Australia
[2] NSW Dept Primary Ind, Marine Ecosyst, Fisheries Res, Huskisson, Australia
[3] In2iti0n Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia
[4] Western Sydney Univ, THRI, Campbelltown, Australia
[5] Macquarie Univ, Sch Nat Sci, Macquarie Pk, Australia
关键词
Object detection; image classification; species identification; computer vision; machine learning; marine ecology; recreational catch; fisheries monitoring; fish stocks; artificial intelligence; SPECIES CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE-ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/00288330.2024.2438227
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Recreational fishing is an important social and economic activity on a global scale. In Australia, the quantification of the recreational fishing catch has relied on voluntary surveys, which require significant human resourcing for data collection and also limit the sampling and the precision of the estimates. Artificial intelligence (AI) incorporated into fish cleaning tables offers the opportunity to collect data in an almost continuous manner with little human effort. To date, the feasibility of such an approach has not been tested nor optimised. Here, we present a rudimentary image classification model that we developed with a dataset of only 2000 images, and test its accuracy and the deployment variables that may affect its performance. We assessed the influence of camera height, image resolution, species, fish orientation and position on identification and measurement accuracy. Lowering camera height and photographing fish in their dorsal orientation increased identification accuracy, while poor image resolution decreased measurement accuracy. These results informed subsequent development of an object detection model with increased performance (80% true positives compared to 30% for the image classification model). This assessment indicates the substantial promise of AI to sample recreational fisheries catches, with the potential to dramatically increase data collection for recreational fisheries management.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fishing strange data in national fisheries statistics of Greece
    Moutopoulos, Dimitrios K.
    Koutsikopoulos, Constantin
    MARINE POLICY, 2014, 48 : 114 - 122
  • [32] Review of the Fisheries Indicators for Monitoring the Impacts of Fishing on Fish Communities
    Kantoussan, Justin
    Lae, Raymond
    Tine, Mbaye
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE, 2018, 26 (04) : 460 - 478
  • [33] Measuring Angling Quality in Count Data Models of Recreational Fishing A Non-Nested Test of Three Approaches
    Englin, Jeffrey
    Lambert, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1995, 6 (04): : 389 - 399
  • [34] Social barriers to sustainable recreational fisheries management under quasicommon property fishing rights regime
    Arlinghaus, Robert
    RECONCILING FISHERIES WITH CONSERVATION, VOLS I AND II, 2008, 49 : 105 - 122
  • [35] Recreational fishing as a source for the monitoring of a critically endangered shark in southern Brazil
    dos Santos, Paulo Roberto Santos
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2021, 241
  • [36] Integrating recreational fishing into harvest strategies: linking data with objectives
    Fowler, Ashley M.
    Ochwada-Doyle, Faith A.
    Dowling, Natalie A.
    Folpp, Heath
    Hughes, Julian M.
    Lowry, Michael B.
    Lyle, Jeremy M.
    Lynch, Tim P.
    Miles, Nathan G.
    Chick, Rowan C.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 79 (02) : 285 - 307
  • [37] Realizing the potential of trait-based approaches to advance fisheries science
    Barnett, Lewis A. K.
    Jacobsen, Nis S.
    Thorson, James T.
    Cope, Jason M.
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2019, 20 (05) : 1034 - 1050
  • [38] Recreational sea fishing in Europe in a global contextParticipation rates, fishing effort, expenditure, and implications for monitoring and assessment
    Hyder, Kieran
    Weltersbach, Marc Simon
    Armstrong, Mike
    Ferter, Keno
    Townhill, Bryony
    Ahvonen, Anssi
    Arlinghaus, Robert
    Baikov, Andrei
    Bellanger, Manuel
    Birzaks, Janis
    Borch, Trude
    Cambie, Giulia
    de Graaf, Martin
    Diogo, Hugo M. C.
    Dziemian, Lukasz
    Gordoa, Ana
    Grzebielec, Ryszard
    Hartill, Bruce
    Kagervall, Anders
    Kapiris, Kostas
    Karlsson, Martin
    Kleiven, Alf Ring
    Lejk, Adam M.
    Levrel, Harold
    Lovell, Sabrina
    Lyle, Jeremy
    Moilanen, Pentti
    Monkman, Graham
    Morales-Nin, Beatriz
    Mugerza, Estanis
    Martinez, Roi
    O'Reilly, Paul
    Olesen, Hans Jakob
    Papadopoulos, Anastasios
    Pita, Pablo
    Radford, Zachary
    Radtke, Krzysztof
    Roche, William
    Rocklin, Delphine
    Ruiz, Jon
    Scougal, Callum
    Silvestri, Roberto
    Skov, Christian
    Steinback, Scott
    Sundelof, Andreas
    Svagzdys, Arvydas
    Turnbull, David
    van der Hammen, Tessa
    van Voorhees, David
    van Winsen, Frankwin
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2018, 19 (02) : 225 - 243
  • [39] Pilot surveys to improve monitoring of marine recreational fisheries in Hawai'i
    Ma, Hongguang
    Ogawa, Tom K.
    Sminkey, Thomas R.
    Breidt, F. Jay
    Lesser, Virginia M.
    Opsomer, Jean D.
    Foster, John R.
    Van Voorhees, David A.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2018, 204 : 197 - 208
  • [40] Optogenetic and Chemogenetic Approaches To Advance Monitoring Molecules
    McElligott, Zoe
    ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 6 (07): : 944 - 947