Comparison of the Effectiveness of Artificial Neural Networks and Elastic Net Regression in Surface Runoff Modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Dawidowicz, Jacek [1 ]
Buczynski, Rafal [1 ]
机构
[1] Bialystok Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Dept Water Supply & Sewage Syst, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
关键词
runoff; subcatchments; SWMM; regression; ANN; Elastic Net; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.3390/w17030405
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study compares Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Elastic Net regression for predicting surface runoff in urban stormwater catchments. Both models were trained on a data set derived from the Stormwater Management Model that included parameters such as imperviousness, flow path width, slope, Manning coefficients, and depression storage. ANN exhibited greater predictive accuracy and stability, especially when modeling nonlinear hydrologic interactions, while Elastic Net offered faster inference and clearer interpretability, but showed reduced accuracy in low-flow conditions. Validation on real-world data revealed the sensitivity of the models to scenarios not fully represented during training. Despite higher computational demands, the ANN proved more adaptable, while the more resource-efficient Elastic Net remains suitable for time-critical or large-scale applications. These findings provide practical insights for urban water resource management, indicating when each approach can be most effectively used in flood risk assessment and stormwater infrastructure planning.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surface roughness predictive modeling: neural networks versus regression
    Feng, CX
    Wang, XF
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2003, 35 (01) : 11 - 27
  • [22] Mortality Prediction in Patients With Breast Cancer by Artificial Neural Network Model and Elastic Net Regression
    Esmaeili, Anis
    Karamoozian, Ali
    Bahrampour, Abbas
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [23] Analysing customer satisfaction data: a comparison of regression and artificial neural networks
    Gronholdt, L
    Martensen, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2005, 47 (02) : 121 - 130
  • [24] Comparison of viscosity prediction capabilities of regression models and artificial neural networks
    Gulum, Mert
    Onay, Funda Kutlu
    Bilgin, Atilla
    ENERGY, 2018, 161 : 361 - 369
  • [25] Comparison of artificial neural networks and regression analysis for airway passenger estimation
    Ari, Didem
    Ozfirat, Pinar Mizrak
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2024, 115
  • [26] Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modeling - Reply
    Chen, Jieyun
    Adams, Barry J.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 329 (1-2) : 277 - 280
  • [27] Artificial neural networks for machining processes surface roughness modeling
    Pontes, Fabricio J.
    Ferreira, Joao R.
    Silva, Messias B.
    Paiva, Anderson P.
    Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 49 (9-12): : 879 - 902
  • [28] Surface Wettability Modeling and Predicting via Artificial Neural Networks
    Peta, Katarzyna
    MATERIALS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [29] Modeling Soil Specific Surface Area with Artificial Neural Networks
    Ismeik, Muhannad
    Al-Rawi, Orabi
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2014, 37 (04):
  • [30] Artificial neural networks for machining processes surface roughness modeling
    Fabricio J. Pontes
    João R. Ferreira
    Messias B. Silva
    Anderson P. Paiva
    Pedro Paulo Balestrassi
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 49 : 879 - 902