Comparison of the Effectiveness of Artificial Neural Networks and Elastic Net Regression in Surface Runoff Modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Dawidowicz, Jacek [1 ]
Buczynski, Rafal [1 ]
机构
[1] Bialystok Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Dept Water Supply & Sewage Syst, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
关键词
runoff; subcatchments; SWMM; regression; ANN; Elastic Net; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.3390/w17030405
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study compares Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Elastic Net regression for predicting surface runoff in urban stormwater catchments. Both models were trained on a data set derived from the Stormwater Management Model that included parameters such as imperviousness, flow path width, slope, Manning coefficients, and depression storage. ANN exhibited greater predictive accuracy and stability, especially when modeling nonlinear hydrologic interactions, while Elastic Net offered faster inference and clearer interpretability, but showed reduced accuracy in low-flow conditions. Validation on real-world data revealed the sensitivity of the models to scenarios not fully represented during training. Despite higher computational demands, the ANN proved more adaptable, while the more resource-efficient Elastic Net remains suitable for time-critical or large-scale applications. These findings provide practical insights for urban water resource management, indicating when each approach can be most effectively used in flood risk assessment and stormwater infrastructure planning.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A regression modeling method of the artificial neural networks
    Li, P
    Mu, XF
    ELECTRONIC IMAGING AND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS II, 1998, 3561 : 398 - 402
  • [2] RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    Tokar, A. Sezin
    Johnson, Peggy A.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 1999, 4 (03) : 232 - 239
  • [3] Rainfall runoff modeling using artificial neural networks - Discussion
    Kumar, A
    Minocha, VK
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2001, 6 (02) : 176 - 177
  • [4] Modeling runoff in Bhima River catchment, India: A comparison of artificial neural networks and empirical models
    Dalavi, Pradip
    Bhakar, Sita Ram
    Rajput, Jitendra
    Gaddikeri, Venkatesh
    Tiwari, Ravindra Kumar
    Shukla, Abhishek
    Vishwakarma, Dinesh Kumar
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (07) : 2595 - 2612
  • [5] Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: Conventional Regression and Artificial Neural Networks Approach
    Vyas, Sunil Kumar
    Sharma, Gunwant
    Mathur, Yogesh Prakash
    Chandwani, Vinay
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCES AND INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING (ICRAIE), 2016,
  • [6] Multiobjective training of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modeling
    de Vos, N. J.
    Rientjes, T. H. M.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (08)
  • [7] Rainfall-runoff modeling at daily scale with artificial neural networks
    Xu, Qin
    Ren, Lihang
    Yu, Zhongbo
    Yang, Bang
    Wang, Guizuo
    ICNC 2008: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 504 - 508
  • [8] COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL REGRESSION METHODS AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR POTATO MASS MODELING WITH DIMENSIONAL ATTRIBUTES
    Ghanbarian, Davoud
    Farhadi, Roohollah
    TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING 2010, 2010, : 178 - 183
  • [9] Comparison of retention modeling in ion chromatography by using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks
    Bolanca, T
    Cerjan-Stefanovic, S
    Srecnik, G
    Debeljak, Z
    Novic, M
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 40 (06) : 1333 - 1352
  • [10] Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks with Logistic Regression for Detection of Obesity
    Seyed Taghi Heydari
    Seyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi
    Najaf Zare
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2012, 36 : 2449 - 2454