Singularisation or Universalisation ? Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer on "Education after Auschwitz"

被引:0
|
作者
Rieger-Ladich, Markus [1 ]
Yamana, Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Inst Erziehungswissensch, Munzgasse 26, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Educ, 7-3-1 Hongo,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGIK | 2024年 / 70卷 / 04期
关键词
Critical Theory; Memory Culture; Guilt; Shoah; Disciplinary History;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Theodor W. Adorno's radio lecture on 'Education afterAuschwitz' was not only met with a great response in educational science; for a long time, it was also considered a central contribution of Critical Theory to the debate on the culture of remembrance. In this article, we first explain its reception within German-language educational science and then contrast it with Max Horkheimer's reflections. The latter chose a different approach to Adorno. Instead of focusing on the question of guilt and the singularity of the Holocaust, Horkheimer outlines a historical-political education and advocates understanding the National Socialist atrocities as part of a global history of violence. These contributions, which were mostly published in remote locations, have not yet received the recognition they deserve within German-language educational science. This is unfortunate, because Horkheimer's promotion of historical judgement in the mode of comparison raised many questions that are currently being discussed in the debate on a pluralistic culture of remembrance.
引用
收藏
页数:172
相关论文
共 50 条