Pharmaceutical industry use of key opinion leaders to market prescription opioids: A review of internal industry documents

被引:0
|
作者
Gac, Brian [1 ]
Tavares, Kgosi [2 ]
Yakubi, Hanna [3 ]
Khan, Hannah [4 ]
Apollonio, Dorie E. [1 ]
Crosbie, Eric [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Nevada Reno, Sch Publ Hlth, Reno, NV USA
[3] Univ Calif Sacramento, Dept Pharm, Davis Hlth Syst, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Univ Nevada, Reno Sch Med, Reno, NV USA
[5] Univ Nevada Reno, Ozmen Inst Global Studies, Reno, NV USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Analgesics; Opioid; Conflict of interest; Consultants; Inappropriate prescribing; Marketing; EPIDEMIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100543
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: Prescription opioid-related deaths increased by 200 % from 2000 to 2014. There has been limited research regarding channels used by pharmaceutical companies to market prescription opioids. In this study, we investigated pharmaceutical industry use of key opinion leaders (KOLs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective qualitative review of the first 503 opioid industry documents publicly released, which are held at the University of California, San Francisco Opioid Industry Document Archive (OIDA). We reviewed documents including legal rulings, correspondences, witness statements, clinical studies, and corporate communications for relevance and coded them by themes. Results: Between 2001 and 2019, pharmaceutical companies including Janssen, Purdue Pharma, and Cephalon identified, recruited and developed individuals they referred to as "Key Opinion Leaders," (KOLs) that they recognized could reach strategic audiences to influence prescriber behaviors. Pharmaceutical companies identified KOLs through a variety of sources ranging from partnerships with PR firms to social media analysis and congressional and regulatory sources. Companies recruited KOLs through various methods including surveys to identify common names identified by physicians, internal rankings based on friendliness, and opioid prescribing behaviors. Companies employed KOLs as speakers at conferences for branded opioid products, authors of research articles in support of prescription opioids, and consultants regarding marketing strategies. Conclusions: KOLs were employed by the pharmaceutical industry to leverage their reputations in the service of encouraging healthcare providers to prescribe more opioids. It is critical to ensure that researchers and leaders in the medical field are aware and critical of pharmaceutical corporate profit-led biases and are free from conflicts of interest to avoid inappropriate prescribing and minimize adverse outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] Market and business-related key factors supporting the use of compostable bioplastics in the apparel industry: A cross-sector analysis
    Friedrich, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 297
  • [32] CONVERSION OF BY-PRODUCTS FROM THE VEGETABLE OIL INDUSTRY INTO BIODIESEL AND ITS USE IN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES: A REVIEW
    Piloto-Rodriguez, R.
    Melo, E. A.
    Goyos-Perez, L.
    Verhelst, S.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 31 (02) : 287 - 301
  • [33] Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Current Status on the Use of Animal Models of Human Disease in the Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan in Nonclinical Safety Assessment-Opinion Paper
    Tomohiro, Masayuki
    Okabe, Takeshi
    Kimura, Yasushi
    Kinoshita, Kiyoshi
    Maeda, Mitsunori
    Mitobe, Yuko
    Motoyama, Keiko
    Yonezawa, Riichiro
    Sasaki, Shoji
    Fujiwara, Michio
    Watanabe, Kazuto
    TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2019, 47 (02) : 108 - 120
  • [34] The Use of QALY Weights for QALY CalculationsA Review of Industry Submissions Requesting Listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2002–4
    Paul A. Scuffham
    Jennifer A. Whitty
    Andrew Mitchell
    Rosalie Viney
    PharmacoEconomics, 2008, 26 : 297 - 310
  • [35] The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations - A review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian pharmaceutical benefits scheme 2002-4
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Mitchell, Andrew
    Viney, Rosalie
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (04) : 297 - 310
  • [36] THE USE OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) BY THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN JAPAN - A BRIEF REVIEW OF PMDA DATA IN COMPARISON WITH FDA AND EMA-APROVED LABEL CLAIMS
    Ledesma, D. A.
    Tanaka, E.
    Adachi, K.
    Rossi, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A517 - A517
  • [37] Report of Task Force II: Best Practices in the Use of Medical Imaging Techniques in Clinical TrialsConsensus from a Public Meeting, October 16–17, 2007 The Medical Imaging Stakeholders Call for Action: Harmonization Across Key Elements and Integration of Imaging in Therapeutic Development—Pharmaceutical Industry, CRO, FDA, and Allied Working Groups Collaborate for Regulatory Guidance
    Robert Ford
    P. David Mozley
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2008, 42 (5): : 515 - 523