Pharmaceutical industry use of key opinion leaders to market prescription opioids: A review of internal industry documents

被引:0
|
作者
Gac, Brian [1 ]
Tavares, Kgosi [2 ]
Yakubi, Hanna [3 ]
Khan, Hannah [4 ]
Apollonio, Dorie E. [1 ]
Crosbie, Eric [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Nevada Reno, Sch Publ Hlth, Reno, NV USA
[3] Univ Calif Sacramento, Dept Pharm, Davis Hlth Syst, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Univ Nevada, Reno Sch Med, Reno, NV USA
[5] Univ Nevada Reno, Ozmen Inst Global Studies, Reno, NV USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Analgesics; Opioid; Conflict of interest; Consultants; Inappropriate prescribing; Marketing; EPIDEMIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100543
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: Prescription opioid-related deaths increased by 200 % from 2000 to 2014. There has been limited research regarding channels used by pharmaceutical companies to market prescription opioids. In this study, we investigated pharmaceutical industry use of key opinion leaders (KOLs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective qualitative review of the first 503 opioid industry documents publicly released, which are held at the University of California, San Francisco Opioid Industry Document Archive (OIDA). We reviewed documents including legal rulings, correspondences, witness statements, clinical studies, and corporate communications for relevance and coded them by themes. Results: Between 2001 and 2019, pharmaceutical companies including Janssen, Purdue Pharma, and Cephalon identified, recruited and developed individuals they referred to as "Key Opinion Leaders," (KOLs) that they recognized could reach strategic audiences to influence prescriber behaviors. Pharmaceutical companies identified KOLs through a variety of sources ranging from partnerships with PR firms to social media analysis and congressional and regulatory sources. Companies recruited KOLs through various methods including surveys to identify common names identified by physicians, internal rankings based on friendliness, and opioid prescribing behaviors. Companies employed KOLs as speakers at conferences for branded opioid products, authors of research articles in support of prescription opioids, and consultants regarding marketing strategies. Conclusions: KOLs were employed by the pharmaceutical industry to leverage their reputations in the service of encouraging healthcare providers to prescribe more opioids. It is critical to ensure that researchers and leaders in the medical field are aware and critical of pharmaceutical corporate profit-led biases and are free from conflicts of interest to avoid inappropriate prescribing and minimize adverse outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Should the drug industry use key opinion leaders?
    Buckwell, Charlie
    Fava, Giovanni A.
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7658): : 1404 - 1405
  • [2] Industry Support of Key Opinion Leaders
    Neglia, Elizabeth
    Singh-Radcliff, Nina
    Minzter, Beth H.
    Kofke, W. Andrew
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2012, 46 (02): : 180 - 184
  • [3] Industry Support of Key Opinion Leaders
    Elizabeth Neglia
    Nina Singh-Radcliff
    Beth H. Minzter
    W. Andrew Kofke
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2012, 46 : 180 - 184
  • [4] Key Opinion Leaders - SMi's Inaugural Conference Understanding Physician-Pharmaceutical Industry Relationships
    Mason, Vicki
    IDRUGS, 2008, 11 (12) : 889 - 893
  • [5] Human electroencephalography and the tobacco industry: a review of internal documents
    Panzano, Vincent C.
    Wayne, Geoffrey Ferris
    Pickworth, Wallace B.
    Connolly, Gregory N.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2010, 19 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [6] Marketing dimensions in the prescription pharmaceutical industry: a systematic literature review
    Stros, Michael
    Lee, Nick
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MARKETING, 2015, 23 (04) : 318 - 336
  • [7] Marketing Antipsychotics to Correctional Facilities: A Review of Pharmaceutical Industry Documents
    Apollonio, Dorie E. E.
    JOURNAL OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, 2022, 28 (05) : 325 - 328
  • [8] Narrative review: The promotion of gabapentin: An analysis of internal industry documents
    Steinman, Michael A.
    Bero, Lisa A.
    Chren, Mary-Margaret
    Landefeld, C. Seth
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (04) : 284 - 293
  • [9] Building legitimacy by criticising the pharmaceutical industry: a qualitative study among prescribers and local opinion leaders
    Pittet, Anne-Laure
    Saraga, Michael
    Stiefel, Friedrich
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2015, 145
  • [10] CONCEPTUALISATION AND ROLE OF MARKET ACCESS IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Fatoye, C.
    Miller, E.
    Odeyemi, I
    Mbda, C.
    Yeowell, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S328 - S328