Validation to Brazilian Portuguese of the coma recovery scale-revised

被引:0
|
作者
Champs, Ana Paula Silva [1 ]
Santanna, Thayse Nayara Freitas do Vale [2 ]
Couto, Christian Marques [3 ]
Macedo, Roberta Correa [2 ]
Penna, Patricia Sola [3 ]
Cruz, Luciana Charchar Vilas Boas [1 ]
da Silva-Neto, Rafael Xavier [1 ]
Vaz, Luiz Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Rede SARAH Hosp Reabil, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Rede SARAH Hosp Reabil, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Rede SARAH Hosp Reabil, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Brain Injuries; Consciousness Disorders; Rehabilitation; Validation Study; LOCKED-IN SYNDROME; CONSCIOUSNESS; REHABILITATION; DISORDERS; STATE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0044-1791657
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background To improve the diagnostic accuracy of the state of consciousness of patients with severe brain injury, Giacino et al. introduced the Coma Recovery Scale (CRS) in 1991, which underwent revision in 2004, resulting in the revised CRS scale (CRS-R). Objective To determine the concurrent validity, as well as inter- and intrarater agreement of the CRS-R's adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese. Methods This study involved a sample of 30 patients with severe brain injury. Concurrent evaluations were also performed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scale. A total of seven rehabilitation experts were recruited to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability agreement. Results Interrater reliability was moderate to high for auditory, visual, motor, verbal, communication, and arousal subscales (Cohen weighted kappa = 0.765 to 0.892; p < 0.001). Significant inter and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for the total CRS-R scores, all of which were statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Also, total CRS-R scores exhibited a high correlation with the total GCS and FOUR scores, indicating acceptable concurrent validity ( p < 0.001). Conclusion The Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R can be reliably administered by trained examiners. This study demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interrater agreement for the total score and subscales, as well as high concurrent validity between the Brazilian Portuguese version of CRS-R and the other two standardized behavioral scales.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neuropsychological assessment through Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and Coma/Near Coma Scale in a sample of pediatric patients with disorder of consciousness
    Susanna Frigerio
    Erika Molteni
    Katia Colombo
    Valentina Pastore
    Claudia Fedeli
    Susanna Galbiati
    Sandra Strazzer
    Journal of Neurology, 2023, 270 : 1019 - 1029
  • [32] Behavioral Recovery in Disorders of Consciousness: A Prospective Study With the Spanish Version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised
    Noe, Enrique
    Olaya, Jose
    Dolores Navarro, M.
    Noguera, Paloma
    Colomer, Carolina
    Garcia-Panach, Javier
    Rivero, Sandra
    Moliner, Belen
    Ferri, Joan
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (03): : 428 - 433
  • [33] Assessment of Nociception and Pain in Participants in an Unresponsive or Minimally Conscious State After Acquired Brain Injury: The Relation Between the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised
    Chatelle, Camille
    Hauger, Solveig L.
    Martial, Charlotte
    Becker, Frank
    Eifert, Bernd
    Boering, Dana
    Giacino, Joseph T.
    Laureys, Steven
    Lovstad, Marianne
    Maurer-Karattup, Petra
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 99 (09): : 1755 - 1762
  • [34] Validation of Korean Version of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (K-CRSR) (vol 42, pg 536, 2018)
    Han, Hee Jun
    Kim, Ee Jin
    Lee, Hae Jin
    Pyun, Sung Bom
    Joa, Kyung Lim
    Jung, Han Young
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2021, 45 (06): : 471 - 471
  • [35] Examining the Association Between States of Consciousness and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: A Rasch Analysis
    Weaver, Jennifer
    Mallinson, Trudy
    Cogan, Alison M.
    Guernon, Ann
    O'Brien, Katherine
    Hansen, Piper
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2021, 75
  • [36] EEG and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised prediction of neurological outcome in Disorder of Consciousness patients
    Scarpino, Maenia
    Lolli, Francesco
    Hakiki, Bahia
    Lanzo, Giovanni
    Sterpu, Raisa
    Atzori, Tiziana
    Portaccio, Emilio
    Draghi, Francesca
    Amantini, Aldo
    Grippo, Antonello
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 142 (03): : 221 - 228
  • [37] Sensitivity and Specificity of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Total Score in Detection of Conscious Awareness
    Bodien, Yelena G.
    Carlowicz, Cecilia A.
    Chatelle, Camille
    Giacino, Joseph T.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 97 (03): : 490 - 492
  • [38] Validation of music therapy assessment tool for awareness in disorders of consciousness (MATADOC) with the coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R)
    Magee, Wendy
    Narayanan, Ajit
    O'Connor, Rebecca
    Haughey, Fiona
    Wegener, Erin
    Chu, Bernice
    Delargy, Mark
    Gray, Dee
    Seu, Alika
    Siegert, Richard
    Yelden, Kudret
    Tyas, Rosanne
    Schnakers, Caroline
    BRAIN INJURY, 2023, 37 : 124 - 125
  • [39] Prevalence of coma-recovery scale-revised signs of consciousness in patients in minimally conscious state
    Wannez, Sarah
    Gosseries, Olivia
    Azzolini, Deborah
    Martial, Charlotte
    Cassol, Helena
    Aubinet, Charlene
    Annen, Jitka
    Martens, Geraldine
    Bodart, Olivier
    Heine, Lizette
    Charland-Verville, Vanessa
    Thibaut, Aurore
    Chatelle, Camille
    Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey
    Demertzi, Athena
    Schnakers, Caroline
    Donneau, Anne-Francoise
    Laureys, Steven
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 28 (08) : 1350 - 1359
  • [40] Finger or Light: Stimulation Sensitivity of Visual Startle in the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised for Disorders of Consciousness
    Feng Zhou
    Hui Li
    Kai Wang
    Yanbin He
    Yan Chen
    Xiaoxiao Ni
    Yechun Guo
    Wei Lv
    Jiechun Zhang
    Qiuyou Xie
    Ronghao Yu
    NeuroscienceBulletin, 2018, 34 (04) : 709 - 712