Correlation between radiological, macroscopic and microscopic depth of invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study using contrast-enhanced computed tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Thilak, P. S. Gopinath [1 ]
Mande, Tanaya [1 ]
Rajendra, Vinay Kumar J. [2 ]
Prasad, H. L. Kishan [3 ]
Hegde, Padmaraj J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nitte Deemed Univ, AB Shetty Mem Inst Dent Sci ABSMIDS, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Mangalore, India
[2] Nitte Deemed Univ, KS Hegde Med Acad, Dept Oncol, Mangalore, India
[3] Nitte Deemed Univ, KS Hegde Med Acad, Dept Pathol, Mangalore, India
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Depth of Invasion; Computed Tomography; Contrast-Enhanced Imaging; Pathology; Microscopic; Diagnostic Imaging; Neoplasm Staging; Oral cancer; Oral cavity; TONGUE; ACCURACY; FLOOR; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107159
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Depth of invasion (DOI) significantly influences prognosis and treatment strategies in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Accurate preoperative imaging, such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), alongside postoperative histopathological evaluations, aids in determining DOI. This study evaluates the correlation between radiological DOI (rDOI), macroscopic DOI (PDOI), and microscopic DOI (pDOI) in OSCC. Methods: This study included 54 OSCC patients from April 2022 to November 2023. rDOI was assessed using preoperative CECT, while PDOI and pDOI were measured through histopathological examination of resected specimens. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between DOI measurements, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Strong correlations were found between rDOI and PDOI (r = 0.713), rDOI and pDOI (r = 0.688), and PDOI and pDOI (r = 0.897, p < 0.001 for all). CECT overestimated DOI in T1 and T2 lesions, particularly in ulcerative tumors. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences of 1.86 mm (rDOI-PDOI) and 3.3 mm (rDOIpDOI). Higher correlations were observed in the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and worst pattern of invasion 5 (WPOI 5), with r values up to 0.948 (rDOI-PDOI) and 0.980 (PDOI-pDOI). Conclusion: While rDOI correlates strongly with pathological DOI, overestimations in smaller and ulcerative lesions necessitate cautious interpretation. Pathological risk factors, including PNI, LVI, and WPOI 5, were associated with greater DOI and enhanced agreement between radiological and pathological assessments. Overall, CECT is a reliable tool for preoperative evaluation of DOI.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Study on correlation between two-dimensional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Peihua
    Nie, Fang
    Dong, Tiantian
    Wang, Guojuan
    Wang, Lan
    Fan, Xiao
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2022, 80 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [32] Digital volume tomography in the assessment of mandibular invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity - A prospective study
    Ramarathinum, Dharani
    Rao, Gautam
    Kumar, Niranjan
    Anehosur, Venkatesh
    Desai, Anil Kumar
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (01) : 93 - 98
  • [33] Compartment model analysis of intravenous contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in hepatic hemodynamics: A validation study using intra-arterial contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Komatsu, Daisuke
    Yamada, Akira
    Suzuki, Takeshi
    Kurozumi, Masahiro
    Fujinaga, Yasunari
    Ueda, Kazuhiko
    Kadoya, Masumi
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 48 (10) : 829 - 838
  • [34] Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Depth of Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of 125 Clinical Cases
    Michcik, Adam
    Polcyn, Adam
    Garbacewicz, Lukasz
    Wach, Tomasz
    Sikora, Maciej
    Bien, Marta
    Drogoszewska, Barbara
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (23)
  • [35] Renal cell carcinoma T staging: Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Fateh, Salah M.
    Arkawazi, Lusan A.
    Tahir, Soran H.
    Rashid, Rezheen J.
    Rahman, Dalshad H.
    Aghaways, Ismaeel
    Kakamad, Fahmi H.
    Salih, Abdulwahid M.
    Bapir, Rawa
    Fakhralddin, Saman S.
    Fattah, Fattah H.
    Abdalla, Berun A.
    Mohammed, Shvan H.
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (02)
  • [36] Hepatocellular carcinoma - Correlation between vascular endothelial growth factor level and degree of enhancement by multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Kwak, BK
    Shim, HJ
    Park, ES
    Kim, SA
    Choi, D
    Lim, HK
    Park, CK
    Chung, JW
    Park, JH
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (08) : 487 - 492
  • [37] Differentiation between adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Wang, Xifu
    Li, Kangan
    Sun, Haoran
    Zhao, Jinglong
    Zheng, Linfeng
    Zhang, Zhuoli
    Bai, Renju
    Zhang, Guixiang
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 6809 - 6817
  • [38] Nodal-based radiomics analysis for identifying cervical lymph node metastasis at levels I and II in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma using contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Hayato Tomita
    Tsuneo Yamashiro
    Joichi Heianna
    Toshiyuki Nakasone
    Yusuke Kimura
    Hidefumi Mimura
    Sadayuki Murayama
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 7440 - 7449
  • [39] Nodal-based radiomics analysis for identifying cervical lymph node metastasis at levels I and II in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma using contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Tomita, Hayato
    Yamashiro, Tsuneo
    Heianna, Joichi
    Nakasone, Toshiyuki
    Kimura, Yusuke
    Mimura, Hidefumi
    Murayama, Sadayuki
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (10) : 7440 - 7449
  • [40] Differentiation between renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Kai Guo
    Shuai Ren
    Yingying Cao
    Huifeng Zhang
    Yaping Zhang
    Xiaoyu Gu
    Zhongqiu Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 3309 - 3316