Post-hoc Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expert

被引:0
|
作者
Narasimhan, Harikrishna [1 ]
Jitkrittum, Wittawat [2 ]
Menon, Aditya Krishna [2 ]
Rawat, Ankit Singh [2 ]
Kumar, Sanjiv [2 ]
机构
[1] Google Res, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[2] Google Res, New York, NY USA
关键词
CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Many practical settings allow a classifier to defer predictions to one or more costly experts. For example, the learning to defer paradigm allows a classifier to defer to a human expert, at some monetary cost. Similarly, the adaptive inference paradigm allows a base model to defer to one or more large models, at some computational cost. The goal in these settings is to learn classification and deferral mechanisms to optimise a suitable accuracy-cost tradeoff. To achieve this, a central issue studied in prior work is the design of a coherent loss function for both mechanisms. In this work, we demonstrate that existing losses can underfit the training set when there is a non-trivial deferral cost, owing to an implicit application of a high level of label smoothing. To resolve this, we propose two post-hoc estimators that fit a deferral function on top of a base model, either by threshold correction, or by learning when the base model's error rate exceeds the cost of deferring to the expert. Both approaches are equipped with theoretical guarantees, and empirically yield effective accuracy-cost tradeoffs on learning to defer and adaptive inference benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] When are Post-hoc Conceptual Explanations Identifiable?
    Leemann, Tobias
    Kirchhof, Michael
    Rong, Yao
    Kasneci, Enkelejda
    Kasneci, Gjergji
    UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 216 : 1207 - 1218
  • [22] Studying synaptic efficiency by post-hoc immunolabelling
    Jorge Ramírez-Franco
    Beatris Alonso
    David Bartolomé-Martín
    José Sánchez-Prieto
    Magdalena Torres
    BMC Neuroscience, 14
  • [23] Serendipity of post-hoc surrogate marker research
    van der Valk, Fleurtje M.
    van Wijk, Diederik F.
    Stroes, Erik S. G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (23) : 2897 - 2898
  • [24] Assessing Post-hoc Explainability of the BKT Algorithm
    Zhou, Tongyu
    Sheng, Haoyu
    Howley, Iris
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY AIES 2020, 2020, : 407 - 413
  • [25] Subgroup analysis versus post-hoc analysis
    Mullins, CD
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (07) : 1060 - 1060
  • [26] Saturated Post-hoc Optimization for Classical Planning
    Seipp, Jendrik
    Keller, Thomas
    Helmert, Malte
    THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 11947 - 11953
  • [27] Counterfactual Thinking as a Post-hoc Consumption Expectation
    Kwong, Jessica Y. Y.
    Ho, Candy K. Y.
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL XXXVI, 2009, 36 : 559 - 560
  • [28] POST-HOC SELECTION OF COVARIATES IN RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS
    SCHLUCHTER, MD
    FORSYTHE, AB
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1985, 14 (03) : 679 - 699
  • [29] Post-hoc selection of dynamic causal models
    Rosa, M. J.
    Friston, Karl J.
    Penny, W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2012, 208 (01) : 66 - 78
  • [30] Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Survey
    Madsen, Andreas
    Reddy, Siva
    Chandar, Sarath
    ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2023, 55 (08)