Fiscal decentralization and food production: Evidence from Province-Managing-County reform in China

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Hongqi [1 ]
Qin, Cong [2 ]
Zou, Jingxian [2 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Natl Acad Dev & Strategy, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Province-Managing-County reform; Food production; Fiscal self-sufficiency; Transfer payments; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; INSTITUTIONS; FEDERALISM; GOVERNMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102342
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China launched the Province-Managing-County reform in 2004. Since then, the transfer payments, particularly for agricultural purposes, were directly allocated to the reformed counties from their superordinate provincial government, bypassing the initial intermediary cities. The reformed counties also reserved a larger share of tax revenue within the adjusted tax-sharing arrangement with upper cities. Based on the gradual roll-out of the reform, we utilize a difference-in-differences approach and a county panel ranging from 2003 to 2018, finding that the fiscal reform contributes to the promotion of food production. Theoretically, the fiscal reform would affect food production through the changes of fiscal self-sufficiency and transfer payments. However, the results only provided evidence to support the latter channel. That is, the ProvinceManaging-County reform raised agricultural expenditure by effectively allocating transfer payments (mainly special transfer payments) to counties, leading to a significant enhancement of land productivity at the county level, primarily manifested in an increase in the per unit area of irrigated land.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Study on "Province Governs County" Fiscal Administration System Reform
    Ma Rui
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2012, : 1917 - 1925
  • [32] Fiscal Decentralization, Government Behavior, and Environmental Pollution: Evidence From China
    Cai, Hongying
    Tong, Zefeng
    Xu, Shulin
    Chen, Shuoqi
    Zhu, Peng
    Liu, Wenjie
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [33] Environmental Information Disclosure, Fiscal Decentralization, and Exports: Evidence From China
    Fang, Ziwei
    Li, Zhaohua
    Tao, Shuang
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [34] Will fiscal decentralization stimulate renewable energy development? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Chenxi
    Zhou, Dequn
    Wang, Qunwei
    Ding, Hao
    Zhao, Siqi
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 164
  • [35] How fiscal decentralization stimulates inbound tourism: evidence from China
    Tao, Weiliang
    Jabeen, Fauzia
    Weng, Shimei
    Zhang, Wei
    Song, Malin
    Piccardi, Patrice
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2025,
  • [36] The welfare effects of fiscal decentralization: a simple model and evidence from China
    Liu L.
    Ding D.
    He J.
    Quality & Quantity, 2019, 53 (1) : 417 - 434
  • [37] Regulatory decentralization and food safety: evidence from China
    Lin, Wen
    Liang, Jiangyuan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2025, 107 (01) : 54 - 80
  • [38] Decentralization, local information, and effort substitution: Evidence from a subnational decentralization reform in China
    Chen, Sicheng
    Yuan, Lingran
    Wang, Weijie
    Gong, Binlei
    GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2025, 38 (02):
  • [39] Fiscal Decentralisation and Local Economic Growth: Evidence from a Fiscal Reform in China
    Ma, Guangrong
    Mao, Jie
    FISCAL STUDIES, 2018, 39 (01) : 159 - 187
  • [40] Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technological Innovation: Evidence from China
    Zhou, Changyun
    Zhu, Junxi
    Chen, Zhuo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (11)