Automatic Landmark Annotation and Measurement of 3D Mandibular Morphology Using Non-Rigid Registration: A Preliminary Exploration and Accuracy Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Zhewei [1 ]
Lei, Bowen [1 ]
Li, Binghang [2 ]
Ma, Hengyuan [2 ]
Zhong, Yehong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Craniomaxillofacial Surg, Plast Surg Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Plast Surg Hosp, Digital Technol Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
automatic landmark annotation; automatic mandibular measurement; 3D cephalometry; non-rigid registration; GROWTH; MAXILLARY;
D O I
10.1177/10556656241288204
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to develop an automatic methodology for mandibular landmarking and measurement using non-rigid registration as well as analyze the accuracy of automatic landmarking and measurements.Design Statistical analysis.Setting Digital technology center, tertiary hospital.Participants 130 healthy Chinese adults with equal gender distribution, average age 28.2 +/- 5.6 years.Methods Four mean shape mesh templates were generated from 100 head CT scans. Following manual indication of landmarks, these templates were applied for automatic landmark annotation and measurements on mandibles from another 30 head CT scans, using non-rigid iterative closest point registration.Main Outcome Measure: Differences of landmark coordinates and measurements between automatic and manual annotation were analyzed using mean difference, centroid size, Euclidean distances and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), assessing the accuracy and validity of automatic landmark annotation.Results The majority of automatic landmarks (16/22) did not exhibit consistent displacement to specific direction. ICCs of all landmark coordinates exceed 0.950, with 87.9% larger than 0.990. The average Euclidean distance between manual and automatic landmarks was 2.038 +/- 0.947 mm. Most ICCs of linear and angular measurements between manual and automatic annotation (20/26) exceeded 0.900, with the average errors being 1.425 +/- 0.973 mm and 2.257 +/- 0.649 degrees, respectively.Conclusions A novel and efficient method for automatic landmark annotation was established based on non-rigid registration. Its credibility and accuracy in mandibular annotation and measurements were demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of sampling method effects in 3D non-rigid registration
    Saval-Calvo, Marcelo
    Azorin-Lopez, Jorge
    Fuster-Guillo, Andres
    Garcia-Rodriguez, Jose
    Orts-Escolano, Sergio
    Garcia-Garcia, Alberto
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2017, 28 (05): : 953 - 967
  • [22] Deformable density matching for 3D non-rigid registration of shapes
    Roy, Arunabha S.
    Gopinath, Ajay
    Rangarajan, Anand
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2007, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4791 : 942 - +
  • [23] Evaluation of sampling method effects in 3D non-rigid registration
    Marcelo Saval-Calvo
    Jorge Azorin-Lopez
    Andres Fuster-Guillo
    Jose Garcia-Rodriguez
    Sergio Orts-Escolano
    Alberto Garcia-Garcia
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2017, 28 : 953 - 967
  • [24] An improved 3D shape context registration method for non-rigid surface registration
    Xiao, Di
    Zahra, David
    Bourgeat, Pierrick
    Berghofer, Paula
    Tamayo, Oscar Acosta
    Wimberley, Catriona
    Gregoire, Marie Claude
    Salvado, Olivier
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2010, 7623
  • [25] Tool path correction for robotic deburring using local non-rigid 3D registration
    Peng, Peiyang
    Wu, Chengxing
    Yang, Jixiang
    Ding, Han
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2024, 89
  • [26] Data Augmentation using non-rigid CPD Registration for 3D Facial Expression Recognition
    Trimech, Imen Hamrouni
    Maalej, Ahmed
    Ben Amara, Najoua Essoukri
    2019 16TH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, SIGNALS & DEVICES (SSD), 2019, : 164 - 169
  • [27] Non-rigid Registration of 3D Ultrasound Images Using Model-based Segmentation
    Matinfar, Babka
    Zagrochev, Lyubomir
    2014 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOPS (CVPRW), 2014, : 323 - 328
  • [28] Non-rigid registration of 2D manifolds in 3D Euclidian space
    Darkner, Sune
    Vester-Christensen, Martin
    Paulsen, Rasmus R.
    Larsen, Rasmus
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6914
  • [29] Non-rigid registration methods assessment of 3D CT images for head-neck radiotherapy
    Parraga, Adriane
    Pettersson, Johanna
    Susin, Altamiro
    De Craene, Mathieu
    Macq, Benoit
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2007, 6512
  • [30] Non-rigid registration of 3D point clouds under isometric deformation
    Ge, Xuming
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 121 : 192 - 202