Using Artificial Intelligence to Support Informed Decision-Making on BRAF Mutation Testing

被引:0
|
作者
Webster, Jennifer [1 ]
Ghith, Jennifer [1 ]
Penner, Orion [2 ]
Lieu, Christopher H. [3 ]
Schijvenaars, Bob J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
[2] Digital Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Colorado, Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; PRECISION MEDICINE; OPEN-LABEL; MELANOMA; MULTICENTER; DABRAFENIB; ONCOLOGY; GUIDELINES; V600E; GENE;
D O I
10.1200/PO.23.00685
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Precision oncology relies on accurate and interpretable reporting of testing and mutation rates. Focusing on the BRAFV600 mutations in advanced colorectal carcinoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and cutaneous melanoma, we developed a platform displaying testing and mutation rates reported in the literature, which we annotated using an artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) pipeline. METHODS Using AI, we identified publications that likely reported a testing or mutation rate, filtered publications for cancer type, and identified sentences that likely reported rates. Rates and covariates were subsequently manually curated by three experts. The AI performance was evaluated using precision and recall metrics. We used an interactive platform to explore and present the annotated testing and mutation rates by certain study characteristics. RESULTS The interactive dashboard, accessible at the BRAF dimensions website, enables users to filter mutation and testing rates with relevant options (eg, country of study, study type, mutation type) and to visualize annotated rates. The AI pipeline demonstrated excellent filtering performance (>90% precision and recall for all target cancer types) and moderate performance for sentence classification (53%-99% precision; >= 75% recall). The manual annotation of testing and mutation rates revealed inter-rater disagreement (testing rate, 19%; mutation rate, 70%), indicating unclear or nonstandard reporting of rates in some publications. CONCLUSION Our AI-driven NLP pipeline demonstrated the potential for annotating biomarker testing and mutation rates. The difficulties we encountered highlight the need for more advanced AI-powered literature searching and data extraction, and more consistent reporting of testing rates. These improvements would reduce the risk of misinterpretation or misunderstanding of testing and mutation rates by AI-based technologies and the health care community, with beneficial impacts on clinical decision-making, research, and trial design.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making support and drug-based cancer treatment
    Oeser, Alexander
    Grieb, Nora
    Gaebel, Jan
    Franke, Stefan
    Kubasch, Anne Sophie
    Merz, Maximilian
    Platzbecker, Uwe
    Neumuth, Thomas
    ONKOLOGIE, 2024, 30 (05): : 380 - 387
  • [32] Checklists to support decision-making in regression testing
    Minhas, Nasir Mehmood
    Boerstler, Juergen
    Petersen, Kai
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2023, 202
  • [33] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION-MAKING FOR VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA SURGERY
    Risbud, Adwight
    Tsutsumi, Kotaro
    Abouzari, Mehdi
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (01) : E131 - E132
  • [34] The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Recruitment Process Decision-Making
    Al-Alawi, Adel Ismail
    Naureen, Misbah
    AlAlawi, Ebtesam Ismaeel
    Al-Hadad, Ahmed Abdulla Naser
    2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATION (DASA), 2021,
  • [35] Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in Decision-Making for Land Forces
    Tudorache, Paul
    VOJENSKE ROZHLEDY-CZECH MILITARY REVIEW, 2021, 30 (02): : 39 - 54
  • [36] Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision-Making: Is It Problem Free?
    Tez, Mesut
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2025, 68 (04) : e161 - e161
  • [37] Integrating intuition and artificial intelligence in organizational decision-making
    Vincent, Vinod U.
    BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2021, 64 (04) : 425 - 438
  • [38] Application of artificial intelligence in jurisdictional decision-making (Spain)
    Jimenez Cardona, Noemi
    QUAESTIO IURIS, 2023, 16 (03): : 1612 - 1630
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
    Bjerring J.C.
    Busch J.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (2) : 349 - 371
  • [40] Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
    Shrestha, Yash Raj
    Ben-Menahem, Shiko M.
    von Krogh, Georg
    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 61 (04) : 66 - 83