Aerodynamic Optimization Method for Propeller Airfoil Based on DBO-BP and NSWOA

被引:1
|
作者
Guo, Changjing [1 ]
Xu, Zhiling [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Li, Hao [3 ]
机构
[1] China Jiliang Univ, Sch Qual & Standardizat, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Autonomous Reg Metrol Test Inst, Hohhot 010050, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Acad Qual Sci, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
airfoil optimization; aerodynamic optimization; DBO-BP agent model; NSWOA optimization algorithm; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; DRAG;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace11110931
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
To address the issues of tedious optimization processes, insufficient fitting accuracy of surrogate models, and low optimization efficiency in drone propeller airfoil design, this paper proposes an aerodynamic optimization method for propeller airfoils based on DBO-BP (Dum Beetle Optimizer-Back-Propagation) and NSWOA (Non-Dominated Sorting Whale Optimization Algorithm). The NACA4412 airfoil is selected as the research subject, optimizing the original airfoil at three angles of attack (2 degrees, 5 degrees and 10 degrees). The CST (Class Function/Shape Function Transformation) airfoil parametrization method is used to parameterize the original airfoil, and Latin hypercube sampling is employed to perturb the original airfoil within a certain range to generate a sample space. CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) software (2024.1) is used to perform aerodynamic analysis on the airfoil shapes within the sample space to construct a sample dataset. Subsequently, the DBO algorithm optimizes the initial weights and thresholds of the BP neural network surrogate model to establish the DBO-BP neural network surrogate model. Finally, the NSWOA algorithm is utilized for multi-objective optimization, and CFD software verifies and analyzes the optimization results. The results show that at the angles of attack of 2 degrees, 5 degrees and 10 degrees, the test accuracy of the lift coefficient is increased by 45.35%, 13.4% and 49.3%, and the test accuracy of the drag coefficient is increased by 12.5%, 39.1% and 13.7%. This significantly enhances the prediction accuracy of the BP neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic analysis results, making the optimization outcomes more reliable. The lift coefficient of the airfoil is increased by 0.04342, 0.01156 and 0.03603, the drag coefficient is reduced by 0.00018, 0.00038 and 0.00027, respectively, and the lift-to-drag ratio is improved by 2.95892, 2.96548 and 2.55199, enhancing the convenience of airfoil aerodynamic optimization and improving the aerodynamic performance of the original airfoil.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficient robust aerodynamic design optimization method for high-speed NLF airfoil
    Zhao H.
    Gao Z.
    Xia L.
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (01):
  • [32] Multiobjective aerodynamic shape optimization of NACA0012 airfoil based mesh morphing
    El Maani R.
    Elouardi S.
    Radi B.
    El Hami A.
    International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 2020, 11
  • [33] Aerodynamic optimization design of general parameters for cycloidal propeller in hover based on surrogate model
    ZENG Jianan
    ZHU Qinghua
    WANG Kun
    ZHU Zhenhua
    SHEN Suiyuan
    航空动力学报, 2019, 34 (08) : 1741 - 1750
  • [34] Aerodynamic optimization design of general parameters for cycloidal propeller in hover based on surrogate model
    Zeng J.
    Zhu Q.
    Wang K.
    Zhu Z.
    Shen S.
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34 (08): : 1741 - 1750
  • [35] Aerodynamic optimization method of propeller multi-design points and variable pitch angle strategy
    Wang H.
    Liu K.
    Jiang H.
    Du C.
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45 (09):
  • [36] Aerodynamic optimization design of transonic airfoil and wing based on Navier-Stokes equations
    Xiong, Jun-Tao
    Qiao, Zhi-De
    Han, Zhong-Hua
    Kongqi Donglixue Xuebao/Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2007, 25 (01): : 29 - 33
  • [37] Deep Learning Based Fast Prediction and Optimization of Aerodynamic Performance for a Propeller with Gurney Flap
    Liu, Liu
    Gao, Zeming
    Wang, Tianqi
    Li, Jun
    Zeng, Lifang
    Shao, Xueming
    2023 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, VOL I, APISAT 2023, 2024, 1050 : 880 - 892
  • [38] Robust airfoil optimization based on improved particle swarm optimization method
    王元元
    张彬乾
    陈迎春
    Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition), 2011, 32 (10) : 1245 - 1254
  • [39] Robust airfoil optimization based on improved particle swarm optimization method
    Yuan-yuan Wang
    Bin-qian Zhang
    Ying-chun Chen
    Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2011, 32 : 1245 - 1254
  • [40] Aerodynamic optimization design of low-speed airfoil based on response surface methodology
    Deng, Lei
    Qiao, Zhi-De
    Yang, Xu-Dong
    Xiong, Jun-Tao
    Kongqi Donglixue Xuebao/Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2010, 28 (04): : 430 - 435