The environmental benefits of grassroots cooperatives in agriculture

被引:0
|
作者
Cornee, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Rousseliere, Damien [3 ]
Thelen, Veronique [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, Fac Sci Econ, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[2] CERMi, Fac Sci Econ, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[3] INRAE, Inst Agro, SMART, Angers, France
[4] Univ Rennes, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France
关键词
Cooperatives; Farm machinery sharing cooperatives; Pesticides; Agriculture; Collective action; Social interactions; SOCIAL NETWORKS; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; RECIPROCITY; PESTICIDES; INNOVATION; ADOPTION; DRIVERS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108513
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the environmental benefits of grassroots cooperation in agriculture. Specifically, it focuses on the French context, which is characterised by a heavy reliance on pesticides and by strong inter-farmer interactions structured within farm machinery sharing cooperatives (CUMAs). We theorise that these social interactions are strategically complementary in the sense that the agroecological practices of farmers involved in the CUMA network, in a given spatial unit, are influenced by the presence and actions of CUMA members in their vicinity. At the extensive margin, increased peer-to-peer interactions, driven by a higher density of CUMA members, foster sociotechnical exchanges conducive to reducing pesticide use. At the intensive margin, if members individually make greater use of their CUMA, they collectively gain access to technologically advanced machinery assets, which leads to a reduction in pesticide use through improvements in technical efficiency. Our econometric analysis, based on a dataset provided by the National Federation of CUMAs covering 5793 individual cooperatives, fully supports the extensive-margin mechanism. The intensive-margin mechanism, however, is only observed for greater use of agroecological equipment by CUMA members, suggesting a rebound effect when it comes to conventional equipment. Overall, these results point to the idea of a 'hidden agroecological transition.'
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potential environmental benefits of intercropping annual with leguminous perennial crops in Chinese agriculture
    Wu, Kaixian
    Wu, Bozhi
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 188 : 147 - 149
  • [32] Environmental Benefits of Ammonia Reduction in an Agriculture-Dominated Area in South Korea
    Choi, Hyojeong
    Sunwoo, Young
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (03)
  • [33] The benefits and limitations of agricultural input cooperatives in Zambia
    Blekking, Jordan
    Gatti, Nicolas
    Waldman, Kurt
    Evans, Tom
    Baylis, Kathy
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 146
  • [34] Farmland preservation and sustainable agriculture: Grassroots and policy connections
    Korfmacher, KS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2000, 15 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [35] BENEFITS OF RHIZOBIUM TO AGRICULTURE
    SPRENT, JI
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1986, 4 (05) : 124 - 129
  • [36] Benefits of Automation in Agriculture
    Rounds, Steve
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS+ 2018), 2018, : 2241 - 2261
  • [37] AN IMMINENT TRANSITION - PROBLEMS OF PRODUCTION COOPERATIVES IN HUNGARIAN AGRICULTURE
    REDCLIFT, M
    FOOD POLICY, 1989, 14 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [38] Can cooperatives survive the privatization of biotechnology in US agriculture?
    Ransom, E
    Busch, L
    Middendorf, G
    PRIVATIZATION OF INFORMATION AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIALIZATION, 1998, : 75 - 94
  • [39] SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVES' PERFORMANCE: WHAT IS IN THE MINDS OF MANAGEMENT?
    Ishak, Suraiya
    Omar, Ahmad Raflis Che
    Sum, Sarmila Md
    Othman, Abdullah Sanusi
    Jaafar, Juliza
    JOURNAL OF CO-OPERATIVE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [40] Environmental Justice and Grassroots Legal Action
    Marshall, Anna-Maria
    ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, 2010, 3 (04) : 147 - 151