The environmental benefits of grassroots cooperatives in agriculture

被引:0
|
作者
Cornee, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Rousseliere, Damien [3 ]
Thelen, Veronique [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, Fac Sci Econ, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[2] CERMi, Fac Sci Econ, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[3] INRAE, Inst Agro, SMART, Angers, France
[4] Univ Rennes, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France
关键词
Cooperatives; Farm machinery sharing cooperatives; Pesticides; Agriculture; Collective action; Social interactions; SOCIAL NETWORKS; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; RECIPROCITY; PESTICIDES; INNOVATION; ADOPTION; DRIVERS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108513
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the environmental benefits of grassroots cooperation in agriculture. Specifically, it focuses on the French context, which is characterised by a heavy reliance on pesticides and by strong inter-farmer interactions structured within farm machinery sharing cooperatives (CUMAs). We theorise that these social interactions are strategically complementary in the sense that the agroecological practices of farmers involved in the CUMA network, in a given spatial unit, are influenced by the presence and actions of CUMA members in their vicinity. At the extensive margin, increased peer-to-peer interactions, driven by a higher density of CUMA members, foster sociotechnical exchanges conducive to reducing pesticide use. At the intensive margin, if members individually make greater use of their CUMA, they collectively gain access to technologically advanced machinery assets, which leads to a reduction in pesticide use through improvements in technical efficiency. Our econometric analysis, based on a dataset provided by the National Federation of CUMAs covering 5793 individual cooperatives, fully supports the extensive-margin mechanism. The intensive-margin mechanism, however, is only observed for greater use of agroecological equipment by CUMA members, suggesting a rebound effect when it comes to conventional equipment. Overall, these results point to the idea of a 'hidden agroecological transition.'
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multifunctional Agriculture and the Preservation of Environmental Benefits
    Hediger W.
    Lehmann B.
    Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 2007, 143 (4) : 449 - 470
  • [2] Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Organic Agriculture
    Li, Qiumin
    Yang, Fagen
    Zhang, Wudi
    Yin, Fang
    Zhao, Xingling
    Liu, Jing
    PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 610-613 : 3206 - 3211
  • [3] SORTING OUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE
    CROSSON, P
    OSTROV, JE
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1990, 45 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVES ON UMBRIAN AGRICULTURE
    CIANI, A
    RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA AGRARIA, 1980, 35 (01) : 191 - 198
  • [5] Understanding urban agriculture in context: environmental, social, and psychological benefits of agriculture in Singapore
    Nicholas, Sean Olivia
    Groot, Shiloh
    Harre, Niki
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 28 (11) : 1446 - 1462
  • [7] AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATIVES - PROBLEMS OF CONTROL
    CAMERLENGHI, E
    PONTE-RIVISTA MENSILE DI POLITICA E LETTERATURA, 1979, 35 (11-1): : 1283 - 1286
  • [8] Policy options to account for the environmental costs and benefits of agriculture
    Weersink, M
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 2002, 24 (03): : 265 - 273
  • [9] Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture
    Rasmussen, Laura Vang
    Grass, Ingo
    Mehrabi, Zia
    Smith, Olivia M.
    Bezner-Kerr, Rachel
    Blesh, Jennifer
    Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro
    Isaac, Marney E.
    Kennedy, Christina M.
    Wittman, Hannah
    Batary, Peter
    Buchori, Damayanti
    Cerda, Rolando
    Chara, Julian
    Crowder, David W.
    Darras, Kevin
    Demaster, Kathryn
    Garcia, Karina
    Gomez, Manuel
    Gonthier, David
    Hidayat, Purnama
    Hipolito, Juliana
    Hirons, Mark
    Hoey, Lesli
    James, Dana
    John, Innocensia
    Jones, Andrew D.
    Karp, Daniel S.
    Kebede, Yodit
    Kerr, Carmen Bezner
    Klassen, Susanna
    Kotowska, Martyna
    Kreft, Holger
    Llanque, Ramiro
    Levers, Christian
    Lizcano, Diego J.
    Lu, Adrian
    Madsen, Sidney
    Marques, Rosebelly Nunes
    Martins, Pedro Buss
    Melo, America
    Nyantakyi-Frimpong, Hanson
    Olimpi, Elissa M.
    Owen, Jeb P.
    Pantevez, Heiber
    Qaim, Matin
    Redlich, Sarah
    Scherber, Christoph
    Sciligo, Amber R.
    Snapp, Sieglinde
    SCIENCE, 2024, 384 (6691) : 87 - 93
  • [10] Considerations of the environmental and animal welfare benefits of organic agriculture in the Netherlands
    Regouin, E
    ORGANIC AGRICULTURE: SUSTAINABILITY, MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2003, : 103 - 113