Factors Associated With Upgrades From Biopsy Gleason Grades 1-3 to Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Grades 4-5 in Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Le [1 ]
Chen, Kewei [1 ]
Lu, Min [2 ]
Deng, Shaohui [1 ]
Yan, Ye [1 ]
Ye, Jianfei [1 ]
Zhang, Fan [1 ]
Zhang, Shudong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Tird Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Tird Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
biopsy; Gleason score; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; GRADING SYSTEM; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PERINEURAL INVASION; LOCAL TREATMENT; SCORE; CONCORDANCE; DEFINITION; RISK;
D O I
10.1155/ecc/9940460
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Discordances of Gleason grade (GG) between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) of prostate cancer (PCa) patients have raised great concerns. Our study aimed to identify these predictive factors for GG upgrading from biopsy to RP. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of PCa patients receiving RP in our medical center. All patients underwent a standardized 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate needle biopsy, with site-specific submissions. Pretreatment PSA-related parameters were assessed 2 weeks before the operation. Prostate volume (PV) was calculated from images. Results: 679 patients were enrolled after screening. In the biopsy GG 1-3 group, 91 patients experienced upgrades. The multivariable analysis revealed that total PSA (tPSA) (p value < 0.01) and perineural invasion (p value = 0.01) were significantly associated with the likelihood of upgrading compared to the concordant group. Conclusion: The GG 4 group demonstrated the lowest rate of concordance between biopsy and RP. Our analysis identified tPSA levels and perineural invasion as independent predictors of GG upgrading from biopsy GG 1-3 to RP GG 4-5 in PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does the Time From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Clinical T1c Prostate Cancer?
    Eroglu, Muzaffer
    Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
    Sarici, Hasmet
    Telli, Onur
    Ozgur, Berat Cem
    Bozkurt, Selen
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (06) : 395 - 399
  • [22] THE FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH GLEASON UPGRADING AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A PERSPECTIVE FROM THE SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF BIOPSY AND FINAL PATHOLOGY
    Erdem, Selcuk
    Verep, Samed
    Tefik, Tzevat
    Ozluk, Yasemin
    Kilicaslan, Isin
    Tunc, Murat
    Sanli, Oner
    Nane, Ismet
    Ozcan, Faruk
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E50 - E51
  • [23] Comparison of oncological outcomes for radical prostatectomy in Gleason score 3+5 or 5+3 versus 4+4 prostate cancer
    Kim, Hwanik
    Lee, Jaewon
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Lee, Hakmin
    Lee, Sangchul
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 140 - 140
  • [24] Relation of Primary Gleason Pattern 3 or 4 in Prostate Needle Biopsy to Pathological Stage and Progression after Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, A.
    Epstein, J. I.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 189A - 189A
  • [25] Predictive factors associated with Gleason score underestimation on prostate biopsy in a monocentric cohort of 3,062 patients treated by mini-invasive radical prostatectomy
    Audenet, Francois
    Rozet, Francois
    Resche-Rigon, Matthieu
    Bernard, Remy
    Lizee, Daphne
    Lacarriere, Emeric
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Galiano, Marc
    Barret, Eric
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (04)
  • [26] Outcome of Gleason 3+5=8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4+4=8
    Harding-Jackson, Nicholas
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Whittington, Elizabeth E.
    Eastwood, Daniel C.
    Tjionas, George A.
    Jorda, Merce
    Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (04): : 1076 - 1081
  • [27] Percentage Gleason 4/5 as Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer in and Before the Contemporary Era of Radical Prostatectomy
    Ettel, Mark
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Zhou, Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 218A - 218A
  • [28] Relation of Primary Gleason Pattern 3 or 4 in Prostate Needle Biopsy to Pathological Stage and Progression after Radical Prostatectomy
    Amin, A.
    Epstein, J. I.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 189A - 189A
  • [29] Predictors of Gleason Grading Group Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients From Transperineal Biopsy After Radical Prostatectomy
    Zhou, Ling
    Xu, Li-long
    Zheng, Lin-lin
    Chen, Chao
    Xu, Li
    Zeng, Ji-ling
    Li, Shi-yan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 2838 - 2847
  • [30] Percentage Gleason 4/5 as Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer in and Before the Contemporary Era of Radical Prostatectomy
    Ettel, Mark
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Zhou, Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 218A - 218A