Factors Associated With Upgrades From Biopsy Gleason Grades 1-3 to Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Grades 4-5 in Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Le [1 ]
Chen, Kewei [1 ]
Lu, Min [2 ]
Deng, Shaohui [1 ]
Yan, Ye [1 ]
Ye, Jianfei [1 ]
Zhang, Fan [1 ]
Zhang, Shudong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Tird Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Tird Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
biopsy; Gleason score; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; GRADING SYSTEM; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PERINEURAL INVASION; LOCAL TREATMENT; SCORE; CONCORDANCE; DEFINITION; RISK;
D O I
10.1155/ecc/9940460
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Discordances of Gleason grade (GG) between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) of prostate cancer (PCa) patients have raised great concerns. Our study aimed to identify these predictive factors for GG upgrading from biopsy to RP. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of PCa patients receiving RP in our medical center. All patients underwent a standardized 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate needle biopsy, with site-specific submissions. Pretreatment PSA-related parameters were assessed 2 weeks before the operation. Prostate volume (PV) was calculated from images. Results: 679 patients were enrolled after screening. In the biopsy GG 1-3 group, 91 patients experienced upgrades. The multivariable analysis revealed that total PSA (tPSA) (p value < 0.01) and perineural invasion (p value = 0.01) were significantly associated with the likelihood of upgrading compared to the concordant group. Conclusion: The GG 4 group demonstrated the lowest rate of concordance between biopsy and RP. Our analysis identified tPSA levels and perineural invasion as independent predictors of GG upgrading from biopsy GG 1-3 to RP GG 4-5 in PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global Gleason grade groups in prostate cancer: concordance of biopsy and radical prostatectomy grades and predictors of upgrade and downgrade
    Athanazio, Daniel
    Gotto, Geoffrey
    Shea-Budgell, Melissa
    Yilmaz, Asli
    Trpkov, Kiril
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (07) : 1098 - 1106
  • [2] Preoperative prediction of Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: the influence of different Gleason grades from multiple positive biopsy sites
    Poulos, CK
    Daggy, JK
    Cheng, L
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2005, 18 (02) : 228 - 234
  • [3] Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) : 1019 - 1024
  • [4] Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: Differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4
    Lau, WK
    Blute, ML
    Bostwick, DG
    Weaver, AL
    Sebo, TJ
    Zincke, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05): : 1692 - 1697
  • [5] QPI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Quantitative Separation of Gleason Grades 3 and 4
    Sridharan, Shamira
    Macias, Virgilia
    Tangella, Krishnarao
    Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre
    Popescu, Gabriel
    QUANTITATIVE PHASE IMAGING, 2015, 9336
  • [6] Perineural invasion on biopsy is associated with upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer
    Flood, Trevor A.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Keefe, Daniel T.
    Morash, Chris
    Bateman, Justin
    Mai, Kien T.
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Robertson, Susan J.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 66 (11) : 629 - 632
  • [7] Morphometric Signature Differences in Nuclei of Gleason Pattern 4 Areas in Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer With Differing Primary Grades on Needle Biopsy
    Venkataraman, Girish
    Rycyna, Kevin
    Rabanser, Alexander
    Heinze, Georg
    Baesens, Bart M. M.
    Ananthanarayanan, Vijayalakshmi
    Paner, Gladell P.
    Barkan, Gueliz A.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Wojcik, Eva M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (01): : 88 - 93
  • [8] The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Abedi, Amir Reza
    Basiri, Abbas
    Shakhssalim, Nasser
    Sadri, Ghazal
    Ahadi, Mahsa
    Hojjati, Seyyed Ali
    Sheykhzadeh, Samad
    Askarpour, Sajjad
    Ghiasy, Saleh
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [9] PATIENTS WITH BIOPSY GLEASON ≥ 8 PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT ARE THE EXPECTATIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Khauli, R. B.
    Halalsheh, O. M.
    Bulbul, M.
    Wazzan, W.
    Balaa, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 275 - 275
  • [10] Morphometric Signature Differences in Nuclei of Gleason Pattern 4 Areas in Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer With Differing Primary Grades on Needle Biopsy COMMENTS
    Veltri, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (01): : 94 - 94