Comparative Analysis of Selected Metadata Standards for the Processing of Intangible Cultural Heritage

被引:0
|
作者
Ibricic, Anida [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sarajevo, Inst Hist, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herceg
关键词
intangible cultural heritage; material processing; metadata standards; Dublin Core; CCO; VRA; Core; CDWA; MODS;
D O I
10.37083/bosn.2024.29.189
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Goal: Intangible cultural heritage represents "living" culture transmitted from previous to future generations, making it vital to preserve the cultural identity of a people. In this regard, and considering that no comparative analysis of metadata standards for the processing of intangible cultural heritage in the digital environment has been carried out, this work aims to offer metadata standards that will apply to the processing of this type of heritage. Methodology: The research was performed by analyzing Dublin Core, CCO, VRA Core, CDWA, and MODS metadata standards. Along with the assessment of their quality using a descriptive method, and their comparative analysis, the applicability of selected metadata standards for the processing of intangible cultural heritage was examined on the example of the Jumps from the Old Bridge in Mostar, which represent the intangible cultural heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Results: The research results through the research questions of the work show that of the selected metadata standards, Dublin Core and MODS can be used for the processing of intangible cultural heritage, which illustrates an example of metadata processing with metadata chosen standards. Discussion: The application of Dublin Core and MODS metadata standards for the processing of intangible cultural heritage is confirmed by examples of good practice in cultural institutions in Europe and the world. Both metadata standards, through the description of the digital object described by a set of descriptive elements, enable better organization and management of the digital object online. Besides being used to describe various objects and being widely acceptable, the advantages of these standards compared to other standards are that they contain elements that offer a detailed description of an object of intangible cultural heritage expressed in XML syntax. Also, the simplicity of implementation and high interoperability of both standards facilitate meta-search over the global network and access to the necessary information in the digital environment. Originality: This research represents the first research of its kind that provides a comparative analysis of selected metadata standards for the processing of intangible cultural heritage. The importance of the existence of metadata standards is reflected in the key role in the contribution to the preservation of cultural heritage, which especially refers to the intangible cultural heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina for future generations and the promotion of its importance in a wider social and cultural context.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 220
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Slovak Intangible Cultural Heritage Centre
    Potancok, Vladimir
    SLOVENSKY NARODOPIS-SLOVAK ETHNOLOGY, 2013, 61 (05): : 593 - 594
  • [42] Analysis on Community Involvement Level in Intangible Cultural Heritage: Malacca cultural community
    Abu Bakar, Aisyah
    Osman, Mariana Mohamed
    Bachok, Syahriah
    Ibrahim, Mansor
    AMER INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY OF LIFE, AICQOL2014, 2014, 153 : 286 - 297
  • [43] The Routledge Companion to Intangible Cultural Heritage
    Foster, Michael Dylan
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE, 2019, 132 (525) : 329 - 331
  • [44] Challenges to Sustaining Intangible Cultural Heritage
    Boswell, Rosabelle
    HERITAGE AND SOCIETY, 2011, 4 (01): : 119 - 124
  • [45] Safeguarding language as intangible cultural heritage
    Braber, Natalie
    Howard, Victoria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTANGIBLE HERITAGE, 2023, 18 : 145 - 158
  • [46] Intangible cultural heritage in industrial design
    Shen, Yu
    Cai, Yang-chao
    Wang, Xin-yue
    DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP IN THE HUMANITIES, 2024, 39 (01) : 354 - 372
  • [47] The Routledge Companion to Intangible Cultural Heritage
    Gazdac, Cristian
    Florea, Loredana
    JOURNAL OF ANCIENT HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY, 2018, 5 (04): : 82 - 83
  • [48] Intangible Cultural Heritage in International Law
    van Woudenberg, Nout
    NETHERLANDS INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW, 2014, 61 (01) : 116 - 120
  • [49] Framework for UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage
    Artese, Maria Teresa
    Gagliardi, Isabella
    ARCHIVING 2014, FINAL PROGRAM AND PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 132 - 137
  • [50] A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace
    Su, Xinwei
    Li, Xi
    Kang, Yanxin
    SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):