Deep learning dose prediction to approach Erasmus-iCycle dosimetric plan quality within seconds for instantaneous treatment planning

被引:2
|
作者
van Genderingen, Joep [1 ]
Nguyen, Dan [2 ]
Knuth, Franziska [1 ]
Nomer, Hazem A. A. [1 ]
Incrocci, Luca [1 ]
Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M. [1 ]
Zolnay, Andras [1 ]
Oelfke, Uwe [3 ]
Jiang, Steve [2 ]
Rossi, Linda [1 ]
Heijmen, Ben J. M. [1 ]
Breedveld, Sebastiaan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Artificial Intelligence & Automat MAIA Lab, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, London, England
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
ESOPHAGEAL CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; MODEL; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110662
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Fast, high-quality deep learning (DL) prediction of patient-specific 3D dose distributions can enable instantaneous treatment planning (IP), in which the treating physician can evaluate the dose and approve the plan immediately after contouring, rather than days later. This would greatly benefit clinical workload, patient waiting times and treatment quality. IP requires that predicted dose distributions closely match the ground truth. This study examines how training dataset size and model size affect dose prediction accuracy for Erasmus-iCycle GT plans to enable IP. Materials and methods: For 1250 prostate patients, dose distributions were automatically generated using Erasmus-iCycle. Hierarchically Densely Connected U-Nets with 2/3/4/5/6 pooling layers were trained with datasets of 50/100/250/500/1000 patients, using a validation set of 100 patients. A fixed test set of 150 patients was used for evaluations. Results: For all model sizes, prediction accuracy increased with the number of training patients, without levelling off at 1000 patients. For 4-6 level models with 1000 training patients, prediction accuracies were high and comparable. For 6 levels and 1000 training patients, the median prediction errors and interquartile ranges for PTV V 95% , rectum V 75 Gy and bladder V 65 Gy were 0.01 [-0.06,0.15], 0.01 [-0.20,0.29] and-0.02 [-0.27,0.27] %-point. Dose prediction times were around 1.2 s. Conclusion: Although even for 1000 training patients there was no convergence in obtained prediction accuracy yet, the accuracy for the 6-level model with 1000 training patients may be adequate for the pursued instantaneous planning, which is subject of further research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] A probabilistic deep learning approach to enhance the prediction of wastewater treatment plant effluent quality under shocking load events
    Yin, Hailong
    Chen, Yongqi
    Zhou, Jingshu
    Xie, Yifan
    Wei, Qing
    Xu, Zuxin
    WATER RESEARCH X, 2025, 26
  • [22] Volumetric modulated arc therapy dose prediction and deliverable treatment plan generation for prostate cancer patients using a densely connected deep learning model
    Lempart, Michael
    Benedek, Hunor
    Gustafsson, Christian Jamtheim
    Nilsson, Mikael
    Eliasson, Niklas
    Back, Sven
    af Rosenschold, Per Munck
    Olsson, Lars E.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 : 112 - 119
  • [23] Implement a knowledge-based automated dose volume histogram prediction module in Pinnacle3 treatment planning system for plan quality assurance and guidance
    Xu, Hao
    Lu, Jiayu
    Wang, Jiazhou
    Fan, Jiawei
    Hu, Weigang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (08): : 134 - 140
  • [24] Prediction of the Parotid and Rectum Mean Dose Based on Retrospective Data Analysis of Overlapping between Parotid and Rectum with Planning Target Volume (PTV): Institutional Planning Tool to Improve the Treatment Plan Quality
    Nirhali, A.
    Vatyam, S. K.
    Moundekar, P.
    Basu, S.
    Zade, B.
    Hunugundmath, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E562 - E563
  • [25] SINGLE VERSUS CUSTOMIZED TREATMENT PLANNING FOR IMAGE-GUIDED HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER: DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON AND PREDICTING FACTOR FOR ORGANS AT RISK OVERDOSE WITH SINGLE PLAN APPROACH
    Chi, Alexander
    Gao, Mingcheng
    Sinacore, James
    Nguyen, Nam P.
    Vali, Faisal
    Albuquerque, Kevin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (01): : 309 - 314
  • [26] How Fluence-Prediction Error Impact Final Plan Quality: Insights Into a Deep-Learning-Based (DL-Based) Head- And-Neck (H&N) IMRT Planning AI Agent
    Li, X.
    Wu, Q. J.
    Wu, Q.
    Wang, C.
    Sheng, Y.
    Wang, W.
    Stephens, H.
    Yin, F.
    Ge, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)