Safety of Outpatient Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review With Meta- Analyses

被引:0
|
作者
Weisbrod, Luke J. [1 ]
Staple, Brandon L. [2 ]
Westmark, Danielle M. [3 ]
Gard, Andrew P. [4 ]
Surdell, Daniel l. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Sch Med, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Leon S McGoogan Hlth Sci Lib, Omaha, NE USA
[4] MD West ONE Neurosurg, Omaha, NE USA
来源
关键词
anterior; lumbar; interbody; fusion; outpatient; ambulatory; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.14444/8661
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Due to rapidly rising health care costs, leveraging outpatient surgery to reduce hospital inpatient burden is being explored. This study provides a systematic review of the literature on outpatient anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with pooled analysis to determine its safety and feasibility. Methods: Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine), CINAHL (EBSCO), and the Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched on 8 April 2024 for articles mentioning the following search concepts: (1) ambulatory; (2) outpatient; and (3) ALIF surgery. Included studies had (1) patients undergoing outpatient ALIF; (2) an inpatient control group; (3) a sample size of ? 5 in each cohort; and (4) a population aged ? 18 years. Outcome data were extracted from studies meeting inclusion criteria, and Newcastle- Ottawa scores were assigned to included studies lacking a prospective, randomized design. Fixed and random effects models were used to establish ORs and mean difference with 95% CIs for each outcome. Results: Pooled analysis included results from 4 studies. A total of 2070 patients underwent outpatient ALIF and 12,554 underwent inpatient ALIF. The results showed that compared with inpatient ALIF, outpatient ALIF resulted in a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events (OR -0.89, 95% CI [-1.69, -0.09], I 2 = 54.88%, P = 0.03), comparable readmission rates (OR 0.02, 95% CI [-0.16,0.20], I 2 = 0%, P = 0.816), and nearly statistically significant decrease in reoperation rates (OR -0.41, 95% CI [-0.83, -0.00], I 2 = 0%, P = 0.05). Discussion: These meta- analyses suggest that outpatient ALIF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events without a significant difference in hospital readmission or reoperation rates. These results suggest that in carefully selected patients, outpatient ALIF is safe and feasible. This study is limited by pooled analysis of retrospective data. Clinical Relevance: This systematic review contributes to the assessment of the safety of outpatient ALIF spine surgery. Level of Evidence: 3.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11): : 1712 - 1721
  • [22] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of orthopedic spondylolisthesis
    Xu, Xiyan
    Li, Xiuyang
    Yang, Tao
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (12) : 12607 - 12617
  • [23] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for correction of lumbosacral fractional curves in adult (thoraco)lumbar scoliosis: A systematic review
    Cummins, Daniel D.
    Clark, Aaron J.
    Gupta, Munish C.
    Theologis, Alekos A.
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 17
  • [24] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [25] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Richter, M.
    Weidenfeld, M.
    Uckmann, F. P.
    ORTHOPADE, 2015, 44 (02): : 154 - 161
  • [26] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266
  • [27] ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    SORENSEN, KH
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 48 (02): : 214 - 214
  • [28] ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    LOGUIDICE, VA
    JOHNSON, RG
    GUYER, RD
    STITH, WJ
    OHNMEISS, DD
    HOCHSCHULER, SH
    RASHBAUM, RF
    SPINE, 1988, 13 (03) : 366 - 369
  • [29] ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    VANAKKERVEEKEN, PF
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 64 : 105 - 107
  • [30] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Chen, Jiang-Wei
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1259 - 1266