Safety of Outpatient Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review With Meta- Analyses

被引:0
|
作者
Weisbrod, Luke J. [1 ]
Staple, Brandon L. [2 ]
Westmark, Danielle M. [3 ]
Gard, Andrew P. [4 ]
Surdell, Daniel l. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Sch Med, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Leon S McGoogan Hlth Sci Lib, Omaha, NE USA
[4] MD West ONE Neurosurg, Omaha, NE USA
来源
关键词
anterior; lumbar; interbody; fusion; outpatient; ambulatory; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.14444/8661
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Due to rapidly rising health care costs, leveraging outpatient surgery to reduce hospital inpatient burden is being explored. This study provides a systematic review of the literature on outpatient anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with pooled analysis to determine its safety and feasibility. Methods: Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine), CINAHL (EBSCO), and the Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched on 8 April 2024 for articles mentioning the following search concepts: (1) ambulatory; (2) outpatient; and (3) ALIF surgery. Included studies had (1) patients undergoing outpatient ALIF; (2) an inpatient control group; (3) a sample size of ? 5 in each cohort; and (4) a population aged ? 18 years. Outcome data were extracted from studies meeting inclusion criteria, and Newcastle- Ottawa scores were assigned to included studies lacking a prospective, randomized design. Fixed and random effects models were used to establish ORs and mean difference with 95% CIs for each outcome. Results: Pooled analysis included results from 4 studies. A total of 2070 patients underwent outpatient ALIF and 12,554 underwent inpatient ALIF. The results showed that compared with inpatient ALIF, outpatient ALIF resulted in a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events (OR -0.89, 95% CI [-1.69, -0.09], I 2 = 54.88%, P = 0.03), comparable readmission rates (OR 0.02, 95% CI [-0.16,0.20], I 2 = 0%, P = 0.816), and nearly statistically significant decrease in reoperation rates (OR -0.41, 95% CI [-0.83, -0.00], I 2 = 0%, P = 0.05). Discussion: These meta- analyses suggest that outpatient ALIF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in postoperative adverse events without a significant difference in hospital readmission or reoperation rates. These results suggest that in carefully selected patients, outpatient ALIF is safe and feasible. This study is limited by pooled analysis of retrospective data. Clinical Relevance: This systematic review contributes to the assessment of the safety of outpatient ALIF spine surgery. Level of Evidence: 3.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Thayaparan, Ganesha K.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 29 (05) : 705 - 711
  • [2] Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Pennington, Zach
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Lopez, Alexander M.
    Picton, Bryce
    Solomon, Sean
    Nguyen, Oanh
    Yang, Chenyi
    Tantry, Evelyne K.
    Shahin, Hania
    Gendreau, Julian
    Albano, Stephen
    Pham, Martin H.
    Oh, Michael Y.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [3] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approaches: A Systematic Review
    Feeley, A.
    Feeley, I.
    Clesham, K.
    Butler, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 246 - 246
  • [4] Prone Single Position Approach to Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis
    Rohde, Matthew
    Echevarria, Alexandra
    Carrier, Robert
    Zinner, Matthew
    Ngan, Alex
    Verma, Rohit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (04):
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Ai-Feng
    Guo, Tian-Ci
    Chen, Ji-Xin
    Yu, Wei-Jie
    Feng, Hui-Chuan
    Niu, Pu-Yu
    Zhai, Jing-Bo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 158 : E964 - E974
  • [6] Surgical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in revision lumbar interbody fusion surgery
    Cheng-Min Shih
    Cheng-En Hsu
    Kun-Hui Chen
    Chien-Chou Pan
    Cheng-Hung Lee
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [7] Surgical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in revision lumbar interbody fusion surgery
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Hsu, Cheng-En
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [8] A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF)
    John Rathbone
    Matthew Rackham
    David Nielsen
    So Mang Lee
    Wayne Hing
    Sukhman Riar
    Matthew Scott-Young
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 1911 - 1926
  • [9] A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF)
    Rathbone, John
    Rackham, Matthew
    Nielsen, David
    Lee, So Mang
    Hing, Wayne
    Riar, Sukhman
    Scott-Young, Matthew
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (06) : 1911 - 1926
  • [10] The rate of fusion for stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review
    Manzur, Mustfa
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Jivanelli, Bridget
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (07): : 1294 - 1301