Measuring how healthcare organizations respond after patients experience harm: perspectives and next steps

被引:0
|
作者
Sokol-Hessner, Lauge [1 ,2 ]
Adams, John
Hemmelgarn, Carole [3 ]
Miller, Beth [4 ]
O'Connor, Diane [5 ]
Parkerton, Melissa [2 ]
Schweitzer, Leilani [6 ]
Austin, J. Matthew [5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Div Gen Internal Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] UW Med Collaborat Accountabil & Improvement, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] MedStar Hlth Inst Qual & Safety, Columbia, MD USA
[4] CommonSpirit Hlth, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Med, Armstrong Inst Patient Safety & Qual, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Risk Management Commun, Reno, NV USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
关键词
patient safety; quality measurement; communication; reconciliation; benchmarking; ERROR DISCLOSURE; RESOLUTION PROGRAM; COMMUNICATION; SAFETY; CLAIMS; PERCEPTIONS; OUTCOMES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3389/frhs.2024.1488944
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients can experience serious harm from healthcare, the impacts can be prolonged, and events may also affect families and clinicians. Communication and Resolution Programs (CRPs) are designed to reduce these negative impacts, rebuild trust, and improve patient safety, but are not consistently implemented. To inform implementation efforts, enable accountability, and promote innovation, it is critical to develop standardized performance measures assessing CRPs' structure, process, and outcomes. To advance CRP measurement, an interdisciplinary workgroup from the Pathway to Accountability, Compassion, and Transparency (PACT) Leadership and Innovation Network-a group of leading healthcare organizations with CRPs-explores meaningful approaches to measurement and proposes a set of next steps. Interested parties in CRP measurement prioritize developing person-centered outcome and experience measures; assessing equity; addressing clinician and organization concerns about how CRP measurement may affect reputational and legal risk; reducing the burden of measurement; and improving mechanisms for sharing data across organizations to promote transparency, accountability, and broader patient safety improvements. Recommended next steps include: build a national coalition of interested parties to guide the work; overcome barriers to measurement and improve feasibility, especially through the engagement of patient safety and risk management software vendors; explore measure development processes that focus on patient, family, and clinician-centered outcome and experience measures; define nationally recognized standardized CRP measures; consider the role for regulatory and financial incentives to promote their use; and facilitate data sharing and comparative analysis. Ongoing engagement and strategy will be essential to move CRP measurement forward.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How forensic mental health nurses' perspectives of their patients can bias healthcare: A qualitative review of nursing documentation
    Martin, Krystle
    Ricciardelli, Rosemary
    Dror, Itiel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (13-14) : 2482 - 2494
  • [42] Healthcare Utilization and Patients' Perspectives After Receiving a Positive Genetic Test for Familial Hypercholesterolemia A Pilot Study
    Jones, Laney K.
    Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
    Manickam, Kandamurugu
    Butry, Loren
    Lazzeri, Amanda
    Corcoran, Timothy
    Komar, Daniel
    Josyula, Navya S.
    Pendergrass, Sarah A.
    Sturm, Amy C.
    Murray, Michael F.
    CIRCULATION-GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (08): : e002146
  • [43] Is the joint commission on accreditation of healthcare organizations accreditation level associated with the care and outcomes of patients after acute myocardial infarction?
    Chen, J
    Radford, MJ
    Marciniak, TA
    Krumholz, HM
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 804 - 805
  • [44] Accuracy of wrist-worn activity trackers for measuring steps in patients after major abdominal surgery: A validation study
    Li, Zhi
    Feng, Weiyan
    Zhou, Lili
    Gong, Shu
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [45] Medical residents' perspectives on discussions of advanced directives: Can prior experience affect how they approach patients?
    Deep, Kristy S.
    Green, Sharon F.
    Griffith, Charles H.
    Wilson, John F.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 10 (03) : 712 - 720
  • [46] How do Cancer Patients in Economically Marginalized Neighborhoods Decide Where to Seek Care: Perspectives From Cancer Patients and Healthcare Professionals
    Brown, Rebecca
    Petersen, Brian
    Buckley, Bryan O.
    Kyle, Michael A.
    Glenn, Jeffrey
    CANCER CONTROL, 2024, 31
  • [47] How do Community Hospitals respond to the healthcare needs of elderly patients? A population-based observational study in the Emilia-Romagna Region
    Pianori, D.
    Avaldi, V. M.
    Rosa, S.
    Lenzi, J.
    Ialonardi, M.
    Pieri, G.
    Rossi, A.
    Fantini, M. P.
    ANNALI DI IGIENE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA E DI COMUNITA, 2018, 30 (04): : 317 - 329
  • [48] Patients and Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Patient Experience Factors and a Model of Patient-Centered Care Communication: A Systematic Review
    Kim, Eun-Jeong
    Koo, Yoo-Ri
    Nam, Inn-Chul
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [49] How patients experience respect in healthcare: findings from a qualitative study among multicultural women living with HIV
    Fernandez, Sofia B.
    Ahmad, Alya
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Ward, Melissa K.
    Jean-Gilles, Michele
    Ibanez, Gladys
    Ladner, Robert
    Trepka, Mary Jo
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [50] How patients experience respect in healthcare: findings from a qualitative study among multicultural women living with HIV
    Sofia B. Fernandez
    Alya Ahmad
    Mary Catherine Beach
    Melissa K. Ward
    Michele Jean-Gilles
    Gladys Ibañez
    Robert Ladner
    Mary Jo Trepka
    BMC Medical Ethics, 25