Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study

被引:2
|
作者
Rajabaleyan, Pooya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vang, Ask [1 ]
Moller, Soren [2 ,3 ]
Khalaf, Sardar [1 ]
Ladegaard, Anna Gosvig [1 ]
Qvist, Niels [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ellebaek, Mark Bremholm [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Res Unit Surg, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Open Patient Data Explorat Network OPEN, Odense, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
关键词
open abdomen; secondary peritonitis; vacuum-assisted closure; PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; OPEN ABDOMEN; NEGATIVE-PRESSURE; DAMAGE CONTROL; PLANNED RELAPAROTOMY; SEPSIS; MANAGEMENT; TRAUMA; SURGERY; LAPAROSTOMY;
D O I
10.1002/wjs.12472
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Vacuum-assisted abdominal closure (VAC) is being increasingly used as an adjunctive procedure in the surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis. This study compared postoperative mortality and complication rates between VAC and primary abdominal closure (PAC). Method: This retrospective chart review included all patients diagnosed with secondary peritonitis who underwent laparotomy between 2010 and 2019. Data were collected from six hospitals within Southern Denmark, covering a population of approximately 1,225,000 inhabitants. Results: The study involved 315 patients (139 in the PAC and 176 in the VAC groups). In the VAC group, BMI, ASA, SOFA, MPI, and four quadrant contamination was significantly higher at the index operation. There were no significant differences in nonadjusted and adjusted postoperative mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year, with cumulative values of 13%, 16%, and 21%, respectively, compared with 16%, 21%, and 31%, in the PAC group (p = 0.519, p = 0.380, and p = 0.051, respectively). Cumulative adjusted surgical postoperative complications at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year, as assessed by the comprehensive complication index, was significantly higher in the PAC group. Reoperations were significantly more common in the PAC group. The total length of the intensive care unit admission was significantly longer in the VAC group, with a mean of 9.0 +/- 12.1 versus 6.7 +/- 12.1 days (p < 0.001). Conclusion: VAC after laparotomy for secondary peritonitis did not significantly reduce mortality but increased ICU stay, whereas primary closure led to higher surgical complication rates and reoperations.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 400
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with large postoperative wounds complicated by multiple fistulas
    Banasiewicz, Tomasz
    Borejsza-Wysocki, Maciej
    Meissner, Wiktor
    Malinger, Stanislaw
    Szmeja, Jacek
    Koscinski, Tomasz
    Ratajczak, Andrzej
    Drews, Michal
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2011, 6 (03) : 155 - 163
  • [22] Managing the open abdomen with Vacuum-assisted closure therapy: retrospective evaluation of 22 patients
    Arigon, J. -P.
    Chapuis, O.
    Sarrazin, E.
    Pons, F.
    Bouix, A.
    Jancovici, R.
    JOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE, 2008, 145 (03): : 252 - 261
  • [23] Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis—the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Pooya Rajabaleyan
    Jens Michelsen
    Uffe Tange Holst
    Sören Möller
    Palle Toft
    Jan Luxhøi
    Musa Buyukuslu
    Aske Mathias Bohm
    Lars Borly
    Gabriel Sandblom
    Martin Kobborg
    Kristian Aagaard Poulsen
    Uffe Schou Løve
    Sophie Ovesen
    Christoffer Grant Sølling
    Birgitte Mørch Søndergaard
    Marianne Lund Lomholt
    Dorthe Ritz Møller
    Niels Qvist
    Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 17
  • [24] Correction to: Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure with Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Better Outcomes than Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Alone: A Comparative Study
    Giuseppe Salamone
    Leo Licari
    Giovanni Guercio
    Albert Comelli
    Mirko Mangiapane
    Nicolò Falco
    Roberta Tutino
    Noemi Bagarella
    Sofia Campanella
    Calogero Porrello
    Roberto Gullo
    Gianfranco Cocorullo
    Gaspare Gulotta
    World Journal of Surgery, 2018, 42 : 3823 - 3823
  • [25] Enhanced quality of life for oncology surgical patients with vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy
    Rodrigue, D
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2006, 33 (02) : 482 - 483
  • [26] Treatment of the Open Abdomen with the Commercially Available Vacuum-Assisted Closure System in Patients with Abdominal Sepsis
    U. Zingg
    A. Platz
    World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 33 : 1334 - 1334
  • [27] Treatment of the Open Abdomen with the Commercially Available Vacuum-Assisted Closure System in Patients with Abdominal Sepsis
    Wondberg, D.
    Larusson, H. J.
    Metzger, U.
    Platz, A.
    Zingg, U.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (12) : 2724 - 2729
  • [28] Treatment of the Open Abdomen with the Commercially Available Vacuum-Assisted Closure System in Patients with Abdominal Sepsis
    Zingg, U.
    Platz, A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (06) : 1334 - 1334
  • [29] Ether-Based Polyurethane Foam for Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) of Complicated Postoperative Abdominal Wound Dehiscence
    Petca, Aida
    Negoita, Silvius
    Petca, Razvan-Cosmin
    Calo, Oana
    Sinescu, Ruxandra Diana
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2020, 57 (02) : 32 - 38
  • [30] Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Rajabaleyan, Pooya
    Michelsen, Jens
    Tange Holst, Uffe
    Moller, Soren
    Toft, Palle
    Luxhoi, Jan
    Buyukuslu, Musa
    Bohm, Aske Mathias
    Borly, Lars
    Sandblom, Gabriel
    Kobborg, Martin
    Aagaard Poulsen, Kristian
    Schou Love, Uffe
    Ovesen, Sophie
    Grant Solling, Christoffer
    Morch Sondergaard, Birgitte
    Lund Lomholt, Marianne
    Ritz Moller, Dorthe
    Qvist, Niels
    Bremholm Ellebaek, Mark
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 17 (01)