High-precision numerical simulation method for thermal-mechanical coupling in rubbers

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Li, Zhi [1 ]
Fu, Qiang [1 ]
Tang, Nian [1 ]
Pan, Siwei [1 ]
Lin, Musong [1 ]
Wang, Baocheng [2 ]
Bai, Pengxiang [2 ]
Qiao, Dan [2 ]
Zhang, Bo [2 ]
Huang, Fei [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Power Grid Co Ltd, Elect Power Res Inst, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Elect Power Equipment Relia, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Mech Engn Res Inst Co Ltd, Adv Sealing Technol Innovat Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE | 2025年 / 65卷 / 01期
关键词
hyperelastic model; hyper-viscoelastic model; numerical simulation; principle of time-temperature equivalence; rubber rebound; HEAT-GENERATION; STRAIN-RATE; TEMPERATURE; DEFORMATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/pen.26996
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Improving the precision of numerical simulations in thermal-mechanical coupling for amorphous polymer materials is crucial for their effective utilization. To enhance the precision of rubber numerical simulations, this study proposed a method considering the temperature and strain rate to establish tensile testing conditions based on the principle of time-temperature equivalence. Additionally, to obtain more precise parameters for hyperelastic constitutive equations, stress relaxation experiments were conducted to determine a set of stress values under complete rubber stress relaxation, which were used to fit the hyperelastic components of the hyper-viscoelastic algorithm. A finite element model of rubber rebound was established, and a hyperelastic model based on loss factor and a hyperelastic model based on Prony series (hyper-viscoelastic) were used to calculate the temperature changes caused by rubber rebound coefficient and energy dissipation during the rebound process at 110, 120, and 130 degrees C. We compared the calculation results of these two algorithms with experimental data to verify their accuracy. The research results show that the average error of the rebound coefficient of the hyperelastic algorithm at three temperatures is 3.63%, and the average error of the rebound coefficient of the hyper-viscoelastic algorithm at these three temperatures is 0.93%. The comparison with the rebound test results shows that the hyper-viscoelastic method is more accurate and better captures the viscoelastic hysteresis of rubber, but the model calculation time is longer. In addition, at the moment of rebound sample impact, the maximum temperature rise amplitude of the hyperelastic algorithm sample impact position is 2.60, 1.75, and 0.91 degrees C, which are 110, 120, and 130 degrees C, respectively; The maximum heating amplitudes of the hyper-viscoelastic algorithm are 2.05, 1.35, and 0.61 degrees C. The hyper-viscoelastic algorithm is closer to the actual test results.Highlights Applied the principle of time-temperature equivalence. Determination of material parameters using the hyper-viscoelastic algorithm. Calculated the temperature change during the rubber rebound process.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 134
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Numerical Simulation Research of Thermal-Mechanical Simulation Compression Behavior with Uneven Temperature on End
    Yao, Lei
    Fang, Zheng
    Ge, Zhang
    PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MATERIALS PROCESSING VII, 2013, 762 : 368 - +
  • [22] Thermal-Mechanical Coupling Simulation of High - Entropy Alloy Laser Cladding for Inner Barrel of an Oil Pump
    Ding Qianfeng
    Pang Ming
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2021, 58 (05)
  • [23] The Effects of Thermal-mechanical Coupling on the Thermal Stability of Coal
    Chao, Jiangkun
    Pan, Rongkun
    Han, Xuefeng
    Ma, Hongyan
    Qiu, Tian
    Hu, Daimin
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 194 (03) : 491 - 505
  • [24] Computer Simulation of Thermal-Mechanical Processing
    Ruiheng Wu
    JournalofShanghaiJiaotongUniversity, 2000, (01) : 274 - 281
  • [25] Simulation of thermal-mechanical coupling in Al alloy/steel inertia friction welding
    Wang, Hao
    Qin, Guoliang
    Fu, Banglong
    Li, Changan
    Zhu, Guohui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 285
  • [26] Simulation analysis of ground surface residual stress with thermal-mechanical coupling principle
    Zhang, Xiu-Ming
    Liu, Li-Juan
    Xiu, Shi-Chao
    Bai, Bin
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2014, 35 (12): : 1758 - 1762
  • [27] The coupling thermal-mechanical and microstructural model for the FEM simulation of cross wedge rolling
    Li, XT
    Wang, MT
    Du, FS
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 172 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [28] Study of the Solder Characteristics of IGBT Modules Based on Thermal-Mechanical Coupling Simulation
    Chen, Jibing
    Liu, Bowen
    Hu, Maohui
    Huang, Shisen
    Yu, Shanji
    Wu, Yiping
    Yang, Junsheng
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (09)
  • [29] The Grain-Based Model Numerical Simulation of Unconfined Compressive Strength Experiment Under Thermal-Mechanical Coupling Effect
    Xu, Zhongyuan
    Li, Tianbin
    Chen, Guoqing
    Ma, Chunchi
    Qiu, Shili
    Li, Zhi
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (08) : 2764 - 2775
  • [30] NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THERMAL-MECHANICAL STRESS FIELD OF COKE DRUM CONSIDERING DEFORMATION
    Yin, Jianzhong
    Wang, Zengchao
    Xu, Junchen
    Han, Zhiyuan
    Xie, Guoshan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 PRESSURE VESSELS & PIPING CONFERENCE (PVP2020), VOL 3, 2020,